Author Topic: Claim form received from northhampton  (Read 89 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Claim form received from northhampton
« on: »
Hi all

The registered keeper  has received a claim form from DCBL for a parking charge at Manchester airport from a few years back.


The issue date is 06 May 2026, so from what little they understand of these claims I guess they have until tomorrow to reply either online via the moneyclaim.gov website.

Parking contravention is 10/09/2022 for insufficient pad time. Fully want to defend as the pub make people queue up on the car park ( before actually parking ) and make you wait 20-30 mins before finding you a space.

All original paperwork and letters sent have been kept, dont have the receipt for paying though as paid cash.



Thanks in advance for any help and guidance.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Claim form received from northhampton
« Reply #1 on: »
https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/

Post documents as advised above. Especially the original parking charge notice.

If you have a N1SDT county court claim, you have 14+5 days from its date to file a defence, or you file an Acknowledgment of Service and get an extra 14 days to file a defence.

26 May or 8 June.

If you have something from DCBL, give it to your hamster.

If you have something from DCB Legal, please show it to us.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 06:32:13 pm by jfollows »

Re: Claim form received from northhampton
« Reply #2 on: »
Original letter here :



The form is a N1SDT from northhampton.









Re: Claim form received from northhampton
« Reply #3 on: »
Please read https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/, don’t obscure dates as it requests, and see if you can improve the resolution of the image because I’m not sure it’s readable. If you want good advice. Sorry, but you’ve got to help us to help you.

The original PCN from Smart may not be compliant with PoFA 2012 to transfer liability from the driver to the registered keeper, if the driver has not been identified, but it’s illegible with dates obscured so it’s not possible to know.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 09:10:20 pm by jfollows »

Re: Claim form received from northhampton
« Reply #4 on: »
Hi

Image fine pic hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co


Resolution much better now.

Re: Claim form received from northhampton
« Reply #5 on: »
Dated 10/9/2022
Issued 26/9/2022
Does not comply with PoFA 2012 to transfer liability from the driver to the registered keeper, because it was not issued to be delivered within 14 days.
If the driver has not been identified, the registered keeper is not liable, and this point should be the main point of any defence.
DCB Legal will likely discontinue in the face of a properly defended claim, but will make you jump through a few hoops before they do.
You will get advice here.
See
An Act to provide for the destruction, retention, use and other regulation of certain evidential material; to impose consent and other requirements in relation to certain processing of biometric in...
legislation.gov.uk

Quote
9(1)A notice which is to be relied on as a notice to keeper for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) is given in accordance with this paragraph if the following requirements are met.

(2)The notice must—

(a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;

(b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full;

(c)describe the parking charges due from the driver as at the end of that period, the circumstances in which the requirement to pay them arose (including the means by which the requirement was brought to the attention of drivers) and the other facts that made them payable;

(d)specify the total amount of those parking charges that are unpaid, as at a time which is—

(i)specified in the notice; and

(ii)no later than the end of the day before the day on which the notice is either sent by post or, as the case may be, handed to or left at a current address for service for the keeper (see sub-paragraph (4));

(e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—

(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges; or

(ii)if the keeper was not the driver of the vehicle, to notify the creditor of the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and to pass the notice on to the driver;

(f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given—

(i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and

(ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver,

the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid;
(g)inform the keeper of any discount offered for prompt payment and the arrangements for the resolution of disputes or complaints that are available;

(h)identify the creditor and specify how and to whom payment or notification to the creditor may be made;

(i)specify the date on which the notice is sent (where it is sent by post) or given (in any other case).

(3)The notice must relate only to a single period of parking specified under sub-paragraph (2)(a) (but this does not prevent the giving of separate notices which each specify different parts of a single period of parking).

(4)The notice must be given by—

(a)handing it to the keeper, or leaving it at a current address for service for the keeper, within the relevant period; or

(b)sending it by post to a current address for service for the keeper so that it is delivered to that address within the relevant period.

(5)The relevant period for the purposes of sub-paragraph (4) is the period of 14 days beginning with the day after that on which the specified period of parking ended.

(6)A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered (and so “given” for the purposes of sub-paragraph (4)) on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales.
« Last Edit: Today at 06:54:13 pm by jfollows »

Re: Claim form received from northhampton
« Reply #6 on: »
I was initially confused when you said Manchester Airport, but it’s the pub along the road isn’t it?

There are different rules applicable to airport land covered by byelaws, but these aren’t applicable here.
« Last Edit: Today at 06:47:25 pm by jfollows »

Re: Claim form received from northhampton
« Reply #7 on: »
So does it still comply with POFA then ?

And yes sorry meant so say pub.

Re: Claim form received from northhampton
« Reply #8 on: »
So does it still comply with POFA then ?

And yes sorry meant so say pub.
My comment makes no difference, it does not comply with PoFA, no.

I was puzzled because I didn’t think Smart had anything to do with Manchester Airport, but that explains it.

There was a time I’d wait in the empty pub car park before going to collect someone from the airport, but now they’re all mendacious predators, although in fact nobody needs to pay anything to APCOA at the airport itself.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:31:29 pm by jfollows »