Author Topic: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd  (Read 21950 times)

0 Members and 152 Guests are viewing this topic.

Oops. Just realised. That's not what you wanted, is it? But that's all I got from the defendant. If you want the actual N279, I'll have to request it from her. 

Thank you. However, it is the N279 Notice of Discontinuance that we need to see, not the accompanying email.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Yep, realised that just after I posted. Just gotta do some redacting before I post it shortly.
Like Like x 1 View List

« Last Edit: September 27, 2025, 12:20:10 pm by jfollows »

Apologies for the delay. It was a PDF, so had a fair bit of processing to do to convert to JPEG:

https://imgur.com/a/xO1onix

Thank you for that. You should now send the following email to info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC yourself:

Quote
Subject: Claim [claim number] – N279 signed by paralegal: authority to conduct litigation, signature validity, and regulatory notice

Dear Sir/Madam,

I refer to the Notice of Discontinuance (Form N279) filed/served in this claim. It is signed “L. Travis”, position “Paralegal”, and purports to be signed on behalf of the claimant’s solicitor.

Please confirm by return:

1. The signatory’s full name (forename and surname), capacity, and whether they are an authorised person within the meaning of the Legal Services Act 2007 with current rights to conduct litigation (provide SRA/CILEX number and practising status). If not authorised,
2. The precise exemption relied upon under Schedule 3 of the Legal Services Act 2007 that permits that individual to conduct litigation and sign the N279 in these proceedings (enclose the sealed court order or the specific statutory provision, as applicable).

For the avoidance of doubt:

• Preparing, signing, filing or serving an N279 is conduct of litigation.
• Practice Direction 22 requires the individual’s name and capacity when signing on behalf of a party; an initial plus surname is not adequate for verification of authorisation.
• Following Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, unqualified employees may assist but cannot themselves conduct litigation unless authorised or exempt.

Action required:

• Confirm the above within 7 days.
• If the document was not signed by an authorised (or exempt) person, file and serve a compliant N279 personally signed by an authorised person, with their full name clearly stated.

Costs and regulatory notice:

If the N279 was signed by a person not authorised or exempt, or must be re-filed/served to correct the signer’s identity/status, I, as a litigant in person, will treat this as unreasonable conduct. In line with Mazur and CPR 27.14(2)(g), I will invite the Court, in its discretion, to order the claimant to pay the defendant’s costs caused by your firm’s irregular conduct and, if appropriate, to consider wasted costs against representatives.

Further, conducting a reserved legal activity without entitlement is a criminal offence under the Legal Services Act 2007. If any unauthorised conduct of litigation has occurred, I will report the matter to the SRA without further notice and reserve all rights to place this correspondence before the Court.

Yours faithfully,

[Full name]
[Postal address]
[Email]

Give them 7 days to cure the defective N279 and respond to the questions about the paralegal's authorisation to conduct litigation. If they ignore or refuse, send a short note to the court (copying DCB Legal) enclosing the N279 and this email, asking the court to note the irregularity and to consider costs (and/or list a short costs hearing).

This is where you start to get your own back for their unreasonable behaviour.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Not sure what costs can be claimed here. AFA I'm aware, there were none, unless you're suggesting I can claim for my and the Defendant's time?

The defendant can claim for their time at £19/hour and disbursements if the court agrees. However, the more important thing for now is that they respond to the questions in the email.

Depending on their response will determine if costs can be requested. (Highly likely)
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

And what about my time? I've 'spent' a lot more of it than she has.

Can I sign that letter on behalf of the defendant?

Only the defendant can claim costs. Any request for costs must be made by the defendant and can only relate to their own time.

If I could claim costs for the time I spend on here giving advice, I could retire from my retirement! I can't though.

AS I mentioned, what is much more important for now is sending that email to DCB Legal. Those shysters need to be squirming.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Again, can I sign on her behalf?

You can sign anything in her name. You cannot sign "on behalf of". If you are signing something that is being sent electronically, then all you ned to is to type using the full name.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

You mean her full name, not mine, right? Even though it's going from my email account.

It matters not one iota from which email address it is sent. That's like saying it matters which post box you use to send a letter.

If you are doing the form filling and work for her, in her name, then it has to be done as though it is her that is doing it. She would be the person signing it, so if you are doing this for her, you sign it using her name.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain