Free Traffic Legal Advice

Hello

You previously posted a N1SDT form dated from March.

If you ignored this, the claimant will have secured a judgement against you in default, and the court ordered you to make payment.



If so, your first step is to contact the court and find out what happened after you ignored them.

can bailiffs force entry or not..

No - StepChange

Sounds like they are trying to intimidate you into paying... Their only aim is to collect the debt and will not want to discuss the circumstances of the judgment at all.

However, ignoring a genuine court claim puts you in a sticky situation to say the least.

...I wasn’t the driver and I transferred the liability to the guy who was driven the car and the appeal been approved.

Can you explain what this means, exactly?

The things I didn’t ignore them I transferred the liability and it’s been accepted by the parking land but after a year now I received judgment on my name and the bailiffs telling me to come and force entry with lock smith. So I don’t need to be worried on this or what I need to do??

I contacted the civil national business centre ,they said you need to contact DCB legal and when I called them they said you have to call the court..I will just ignore them and that’s it

To be honest I don’t mind ccj on my credit score the only things I’m worried about is to for entry my house. Are they allowed to do that??

If you have a CCJ for over £600 and the debt is not regulated by consumer credit law (it isn't) then they will have obtained a High Court Writ and will be attempting to enforce it. High Court Enforcement Officers (HCEOs) have a lot of powers and will likely use them to try and recover the debt.

This will not simply go away. It could involve attachment of earnings orders or charging orders. It will not simply time out after 6 years.

However, if the CCJ was issued in default, there is a possibility of getting it set aside. However, we would need to know the circumstances of why the claim was not responded to and what actual evidence you have that the liability for the PCNs was transferred to the driver and accepted by the operator.

What happened before the court claim was lodged and ignored is only relevant to the chances of having the matter set aside and defending a subsequent restatement of that claim.

There is no concept in law (other then indemnity) of transferring liability for a private parking penalty to the driver - all you can do is remove their ability to hold you vicariously liable under schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by giving them the details of the driver. If they know the details of the driver, before a court claim is made, they cannot hold you vicariously liable as keeper.

The time and place to argue this would have been in a defence to the court claim you chose to ignore. Regardless of how weak or strong their claim or your defence would have been, if you don't defend a court claim, you lose by default.

So far, you seem to be very good at drip-feeding insufficient information and repeating questions that have already been answered. If you don't want to, or can't be bothered to provide a meaningful account. that's fine, although don't expect much help. If you would rather repeat the same questions, rather than reading the advice you have been given, I'll just lock the thread.