Author Topic: Partner charged with Common law assault  (Read 433 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Partner charged with Common law assault
« Reply #15 on: »
I don’t see any substantive difference. You’ll have to explain what you think the difference is.
I am not qualified to give legal advice in the UK. While I will do my best to help you, you should not rely on my advice as if it was given by a lawyer qualified in the UK.

Re: Partner charged with Common law assault
« Reply #16 on: »
New Judge and Southpaw, thank you for your knowledge and explanation of the law and procedures.

I like to help the vulnerable and those who are ignorant of the law. I only offer them advice on the basis of what I learn from this forum or research. And do offer the advice, in simple terms, to an audience of one.

I am now at the stage that my advice is falling on deaf ears; specifically, advising of meeting with CAB and seeking legal aid. I am now at the stage of Pontius Pilate.

1.  Question what is the potential of breaking indirect bail conditions, not that I am suggesting there has been any impropriety.

2. When he pleads guilty and accepts the evidence presented, at this first hearing, is likely that the magistrates will impose an immediate sentence.

3. Will the duty solicitor be able to present sufficient mitigating circumstances on the day of the first hearing.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:03:48 pm by Mayhem007 »

Re: Partner charged with Common law assault
« Reply #17 on: »
1. Potentially withdrawal of bail and committal to custody. Whether that happens will depend on the seriousness of the breach.

2. Possibly. Possibly not. Unless they intend to dispose of the matter by way of a discharge or a fine (which I think is unlikely) the court will require a report from the probation service. If there is a probation presence in court on the day he may be interviewed there and then. If not, he will be required to come back to court on a day when probation services are available.

3. If the solicitor has sufficient information, then yes.

Re: Partner charged with Common law assault
« Reply #18 on: »
If people don't want to listen, you will only place yourself in the firing line by continuing to interfere. Both for interfering, and as someone "involved" when it invariably goes south.

When I say only, that is incorrect. There is also the added bonus of wearing out your welcome with those who reluctantly waste their time offering advice to the middle-man in a game of chinese whispers to provide advice that, regardless of how effective the canny middleman is, is not wanted by the person who ought to be taking it.

The same applies when a doting grandfather seeks vicarious advice, with half of the story, and none of the facts, on behalf of a grandchild who CBA to do anything themselves.

This is intended more as a salutary tale on the perils of vicarious advice than as a dig at a well-meaning poster whose skin is far too thick to be affected by such comments.
I am responsible for the accuracy of the information I post, not your ability to comprehend it.