Skip to content

Adjudicator threatened after yellow box decision

831 Views 1 Replies

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Adjudicator threatened after yellow box decision
on:
#1
A motorist who lost an appeal over a yellow box fine vowed to track down the adjudicator who heard his case and blow up his offices, a court has heard.

James Brooke, 43, sent a menacing email laden with expletives to Carl Teper after the adjudicator ruled that he was correctly given a penalty charge notice (PCN) when his vehicle was filmed coming to a halt in a north-east London junction.

Alexander Campbell, the chairman of a panel of three magistrates, gave Brooke an 18-month conditional discharge...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/08/29/motorist-threatened-blow-up-tribunal-office-yellow-box/
Re: Adjudicator threatened after yellow box decision
Reply #1 on:
#2
https://www.macclesfield-live.co.uk/news/local-news/here-comes-the-judge-2540350

Sadly, Mr Teper has experienced this kind of conduct before. As a Judge.

In the days of PATAS, I witnessed foul language and papers thrown at one adjudicator after the appeal was refused. Security stepped in and the next case was mine as representative.  But this is extreme.
Last Edit: September 05, 2026, 07:01:24 pm by Hippocrates
@ALL MEMBERS

I HAVE A HIGH COURT CASE RE JUDICIAL REVIEW BUT WILL DO MY BEST TO ADVISE AND TAKE ON CASES IF AT ALL POSSIBLE.

If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"