Author Topic: Adjudicator threatened after yellow box decision  (Read 71 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Adjudicator threatened after yellow box decision
« on: »
A motorist who lost an appeal over a yellow box fine vowed to track down the adjudicator who heard his case and blow up his offices, a court has heard.

James Brooke, 43, sent a menacing email laden with expletives to Carl Teper after the adjudicator ruled that he was correctly given a penalty charge notice (PCN) when his vehicle was filmed coming to a halt in a north-east London junction.

Alexander Campbell, the chairman of a panel of three magistrates, gave Brooke an 18-month conditional discharge...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/08/29/motorist-threatened-blow-up-tribunal-office-yellow-box/

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Adjudicator threatened after yellow box decision
« Reply #1 on: »
https://www.macclesfield-live.co.uk/news/local-news/here-comes-the-judge-2540350

Sadly, Mr Teper has experienced this kind of conduct before. As a Judge.

In the days of PATAS, I witnessed foul language and papers thrown at one adjudicator after the appeal was refused. Security stepped in and the next case was mine as representative.  But this is extreme.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2026, 07:01:24 pm by Hippocrates »
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"