Skip to content
Free Traffic Legal Advice
Login Register

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - NTIAEP

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]
91
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge/50u-Performing a prohibited turn (no U-turn)/Jct of High Rd (Ilford) & Cricklefield Place
« on: May 27, 2024, 09:12:40 pm »
Submitted my inital reps as follows:

"The alleged contravention did not occur and the video and/or photo evidence provided by LBR does not prove otherwise.

Rather, the vehicle took a right turn onto private land, fully entering it and completely leaving the carriageway.  The vehicle then exited the private land and took a left turn on to the carriageway."

@cp8759  how did you get the video onto YouTube?

92
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge/50u-Performing a prohibited turn (no U-turn)/Jct of High Rd (Ilford) & Cricklefield Place
« on: May 22, 2024, 01:04:04 pm »
Yes - the vehicle completely entered the RGB carpark.  I always ensure that it does (specifically for this reason) and have been doing so for the past few/several years, ever since they installed the CCTV.  The reasons for entering the carpark of no concern or business of Redbridge council.

As far as I am concerned, I took a right-turn to enter the carpark and then exited the carpark by taking a left-turn.

Will wait for some more responses from fellow forum members before submitting any reps etc.

93
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge/50u-Performing a prohibited turn (no U-turn)/Jct of High Rd (Ilford) & Cricklefield Place
« on: May 22, 2024, 12:22:19 pm »
......and have just received a 2nd PCN (again via post) for a repeat instance of the same alleged contravention, 3 days after the first alleged contravention.

94
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge/50u-Performing a prohibited turn (no U-turn)/Jct of High Rd (Ilford) & Cricklefield Place
« on: May 22, 2024, 12:15:52 pm »
Front page of PCN

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

95
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Redbridge/50u-Performing a prohibited turn (no U-turn)/Jct of High Rd (Ilford) & Cricklefield Place
« on: May 21, 2024, 02:40:06 pm »
Good Afternoon all

I won't waste my time and energy in having a rant at Redbridge council.

Currently don't have a redacted copy of the PCN, so will post when I can.  In the meantime, details are as follows:

PCN ref: AF9860190A
VRN: SAF17A

Location/Direction Junction of High Rd(Ilford) & Cricklefield Place (Westbound)

I'm very wary of the 'No U-turn' 'For 110 Yards' signs that you can see in the GSV, so in order to head back in the opposite direction (i.e. Eastbound) to then take the left turn up Aldborough Rd South (you can't take a right turn into this road when heading West), I either:

1) take a left turn into Cricklefield Place, perform a 3-point turn further down this road and then exit it by taking a right turn; or
2) take a right-turn into the private carpark of RGB Electrical, making sure that the vehicle completely leaves the road/pavement and fully enters the carpark. Entirely within the bounds of the carpark, I then either:
  a) perform a 3-point turn;
  b) turn the vehicle round in one continuous movement;
 
and then exit left out of the carpark whilst either:
  i)  having to give-way to pedestrians/other vehicles; or
  ii) in their absence, again in one continuous movement without stopping.

In this instance, the video evidence (which I can't save) provided by LBR shows b) ii) as referenced above.

Your thoughts/advice very welcome.

Regards - NTIAEP

96
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: PCN - PERTH ROAD (A) IG2 **Wrong App used for payment**
« on: January 22, 2024, 12:29:22 pm »
Quote from: mrmustard on December 17, 2023, 05:06:30 pm
The 28 day wording on the PCN is wrong (I have 5 tribunal wins on this).

I like to do all the correspondence when technical arguments are involved so for my free help email mrmustard@zoho.com
@mrmustard - I've sent you an email re: a very similar PCN.

97
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: incorrect TFL ULEZ PCN due to transfer of personalised VRN and Autopay glitch
« on: November 07, 2023, 11:13:00 pm »
I simply submitted a very succinct representation to the effect that the make/model given in the PCN did not match the vehicle in the picture.

Will keep you posted.

Thank you for the response.

98
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / incorrect TFL ULEZ PCN due to transfer of personalised VRN and Autopay glitch
« on: November 07, 2023, 08:37:15 pm »
Evening All

The TFL ULEZ car scrappage scheme in itself was like pulling teeth out without anaesthetic, and here is another prime example of the debacle that is ULEZ…..read on:

Apologies as I’m currently unable to scan/post a picture of the ULEZ PCN, but in summary the details are as below. The complication arises in trying to transfer a personalised VRN from a ULEZ non-compliant to a compliant vehicle and a technical glitch with being unable to re-add a vehicle to TFL Autopay account.

Date applicable to non-payment of ULEZ charge: 12/10/23
Issue Date of PCN: 20/10/23

Note: PCN received in wife’s name/address with personalised VRN, make/model of ULEZ compliant Vehicle2, BUT picture of ULEZ non-compliant Vehicle1 (of which I was the registered keeper)


Vehicle 1 (ULEZ non-compliant)
- I’ve always been the registered keeper.
- setup in AutoPay since Aug2020 and automatically paid any applicable daily ULEZ charge of £12.50
- I contacted DVLA on 11/10/23 who confirmed that replacement V5Cs for both vehicles were in the post;
- had personalised VRN physically on Vehicle1 until end of 12/10/23
- in trying to amend the details in the Autopay account, (late on 12/10/23 if I remember correctly), I removed Vehicle1 and on realising I couldn’t update with details of Vehicle2 (as TFL systems had stale data), I then couldn’t also re-add Vehicle1 back to the AutoPay account. I contacted TFL ULEZ customer services team next day 13/10/23 who re-added Vehicle1 back to Autopay account so that I would get charged/reclaim the daily £12.50, rather than receiving multiple incorrect PCNs;
- it would seem that as Vehicle1 was not in Autopay when I assume at the point TFL run the overnight batch process and ULEZ CS did not advise me, the PCN was issued for non-payment.

Vehicle 2 (ULEZ compliant)
- wife has always been the registered keeper;
- has had personalised VRN physically on vehicle from beginning of 13/10/23;
- I emailed new V5C to TFL on 15/10/23 (receipt confirmation received) requesting TFL to:
a) amend its records accordingly;
b) amend (as necessary) the details in our AutoPay account with Customer ID: XXXXXXXXXX; and
c) cancel/refund any and all subsequent ULEZ charges with have been incorrectly applied to this VRN
- it’s been more than the 10business days and the above requests have still not actioned in AutoPay (i.e. still getting charged daily based on make/model of Vehicle1)……….but PCN received reflects new make/model of Vehicle2….go figure.

In principle, I have no issues with paying the daily ULEZ charge which I assumed would have been automatically processed, but no way am I paying the fine due to TFL's incompetence.

Suggestions/advice as to how we should proceed with the initial representation(s)?

FWIW - I've just checked TFL's own ULEZ checker and the VRM is still showing the old non-compliant vehicle. To add insult to injury, it then says:

"Incorrect vehicle details?
Check you entered the correct number plate as results are for the vehicle shown.
We get UK vehicle information from the DVLA - let the DVLA know if your vehicle details are wrong or need updating."

It's not DVLA that's the issue.........it's the bunch of f***wits that TFL have employed to implement/administer this sham of a system.


Regards - NTIAEP

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]