Free Traffic Legal Advice

In the bylaws:-

-------
6.2 Parking in time restricted areas
leave or park a vehicle or cause it to wait for a period in excess of the permitted
time in an area where the period of waiting is restricted by notice.
6.3 Parking in prohibited areas
wait leave or park a vehicle where waiting or parking is prohibited by notic
------

Also under penalties:-

-----
3.4 any other byelaws shall not exceed level 3 on the standard scale

in each case as the standard scale has effect from time to time by virtue either

of Section 37 (2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1982 or of an order under section
143 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980.
----

 I think this covers the offence (*bylaws)

It looks like op turned left leaving the drop off car park (that area down there used to be a staff car park). It looks covered by the VCS contract IF op was not beyond the roundabout (their pin is).

But it seems very unlikely it is not covered by the airport bylaws (easy find on line).

Unfortunately I have never been able to find a map of the area covered. It's not in the bylaws or described therein.

Does a driver magically contravene the conditions because of the actions of an external actor.

They have temporary lights that keep getting shifted around due to construction works. I often see folk jumping in or out when they are red.

You can normally make representations online.

However it seems as though the amount has already increased to £105 and the charge certificate is on the way.

It's hard to see any representation succeeding in any event. There were a pair of no vehicles signs completely unobscured you drove straight past.

An excess would only apply to an own damage type claim on most regular policies (though there are policies which apply excess to any claims - all sections).

It seems odd that your NCD was unaffected - unless it was protected.

Did the insurers tell you what the claim was settled for, your new insurers may want to know.

It is possible the final claim value was zero. This wouldn't generally impact NCD but would impact premium.

Somewhere on the DVLA website it says the vehicle can be signed away in lieu of the impound fees. But that's something the registered keeper has to do. Presumably now they have died somebody needs some form of executors powers. Who might that be ?

Regarding the penalty. It is an offer to settle the matter out of court. (Has a penalty actually been received or was it just clamped).

Not accepting the offer should eventually result in a DVLA prosecution. But of whom? I would imagine that they would choose not to proceed when notified.

The chance of any enforcement is effectively zero.

If you post up redacted copies of the notices and receipt etc which should all have been in English that may help.

You will need a file sharing site. Something like Google drive and make them public.

It is arguably not combined because it is itemised separately.

Part of the charging order for Bristol (easily downloadable) states (I think it's 19 but can recall off the top of my head) that a licence may only be purchased on day of travel +/- 6 days.

That gives them no ability to demand it now.

(It does not sit well with the the other regulation to allow penalty charge and Caz on top).

Incandescent and/or HCAnderson have posted the relevant part of the overarching regulations which determine the argued contents of a PCN. You should be specific and include the specific regulations wording.

One other thing that might help bolster your case is to go through the motions of paying and see if there is any way that it will allow you (keep screenshots) to pay just the £60 discounted penalty. (I can see an argument attempted that they are merely demanding £60 and asking you nicely to pay the £9, screenshots could put paid to that).

Do remember that the discounted penalty will need to be available should you lose.

There may be other CAZ appeals on here you can search for to explore the exact parts of regulations.

So far, Bristol have quietly let these fall away rather than continue, but there is no guarantee.

I couldn't read the NoR properly (my problem) but it doesn't seem to cover the additional Caz charge being added.

In my view that is a "failure to consider" in addition to "penalty exceeds".