Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
As above, what is the address on the V5C vs where you live? If they're different, why?
Please don't bloat-quote as it makes the thread unnecessarily long.
I think the distance from your car to the sign is the strongest point but I just need to clear up one thing: you parked, got out, didn't see any signs, why would you believe it's a 2 hour zone?
There's a potential argument to be made that the signage doesn't create a contract - running such an argument is always a gamble however as you'd need to go to court to make it (and even then it's not a guaranteed winner) - it depends somewhat on your attitude to risk.
It has one sign as you drive in on the left but no further ones on that side.From the images taken of the car as shown on the PCN, it appears that it was parked directly underneath a sign, so I think it would be a challenge to argue that the signage wasn't sufficiently visible. But the reason for issue being listed as 'No Permit' suggests that there could be an argument that the signage is forbidding - can we see a photo of the signage?appeal as RK and not being driverFrom a quick look they appear to have complied with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act (PoFA), so not being the driver would not help, as they appear to have met the conditions to hold the keeper liable.
Not really - a letter sent by first class post is presumed delivered 2 working days later unless the contrary can be proved.
Is your vehicle definitely non-compliant with the ULEZ compliancy rules ? There have been one or two cases where there was a dispute about compliancy.