Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - ashirusnw

Pages: 1 [2] 3
16
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: PCN no entry
« on: October 30, 2023, 04:10:05 pm »
Here are:

The Haringey (Moving Traffic Restrictions) (No.14) Experimental Order 2023
The Haringey (Moving Traffic Restrictions) (No.14) Experimental Order 2023 maps

Can't see anything wrong with those, but the PCN is flawed.

Draft reps:

Dear London Borough of Haringey,

I challenge liability for this PCN on the grounds that the penalty demanded exceeds the amount due in the circumstances of the case. In this instance the penalty charge wrongly asserts that a charge certificate may be issued after 28 days from the date of the notice, rather than 28 days from the date of service of the notice (as it should).

I draw your attention to the decision in Robert Atlas v London Borough of Barnet (2170053479, 24 April 2017), which comprehensively deals with this point, and was recently followed in Edmundson Electrical Ltd v City of London (2220061290, 07 March 2022) and Goode Durrant Administration Ltd v City of London (2230004045, 01 February 2023).

In light of the above the penalty charge must be cancelled.

Yours faithfully,


Send the representations online via the council website and get a screenshot of the confirmation page. Don't worry about the discount, you will almost certainly have to appeal to the tribunal but we will help with that. And you will almost certainly prevail in the end.

Thank you so much, I will pass on and keep you updated

17
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: PCN no entry
« on: October 29, 2023, 01:08:00 pm »
bump pls

18
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / PCN no entry
« on: October 26, 2023, 03:15:40 pm »
Hi, this ain't my ticket I'm helping a friend, so I don't have photos or more details yet but it's for driving through a (fairly new) new entry sign.

Hoping PCN wording is wrong.

I'm not certain which legislation covers this, but if it's  London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003 then it doesn't seem to say the address to which payment must be sent and says "maybe" instead of "may be" but perhaps there's a more fundemental flaw ... I'm new to this!

In any event, hows a driver to manage to turn around safely so close to a T junction?

PCN:



GSV but note this is recent restriction so this signage and the planters aren't shown:
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5908598,-0.090167,3a,75y,90.96h,85.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1syLWyr0jsVJfu0Gh36_HFLw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

19
The 2008 order does include roads in Barnet on pages 5-8 but incorrectly under the heading of "GLA Roads in London Borough of Barking & Dagenham" which is given twice ! (probably drafted with wrong/duplicated heading because Barnet following Barking next in alphabetical order)
So it does!

I think this is the relevant entry (my bold):

NORTH CIRCULAR ROAD (A406) OFF SLIP ROAD, the south side from a point 3 metres south-west of the extended north easternmost building line of Garden Court Hotel, Tilling Road to its roundabout junction with the unnamed M1 Motorway slip roads

So we don't have to worry about the end of red route sign being on the boundary or anything of that sort, because all of Tilling Road is a GLA road. This being the case, the borough cannot enforce without the prior written consent of Transport for London (which they won't have because they won't have bothered reading the legislation).

Here are a few cases won on this point:

William Samuel v London Borough of Lewisham (2220837736, 13 December 2022)
Commercial Plant Services Ltd v London Borough of Lambeth (2230127577, 15 March 2023)
Maurice Luftig v London Borough of Hackney (2230151491, 15 April 2023)
Robert Greens v London Borough of Lewisham (2230366024, 11 September 2023)

Let us know when you get the rejection and I'll sort out the appeal for you. The outcome cannot guaranteed, but what I can tell you is that this argument has never lost.

Thank you so much, I'll keep you posted

20
The 2008 order does include roads in Barnet on pages 5-8 but incorrectly under the heading of "GLA Roads in London Borough of Barking & Dagenham" which is given twice ! (probably drafted with wrong/duplicated heading because Barnet following Barking next in alphabetical order)

21
And finally (dunno if relevant):


22
Atually, I found this this tool https://tfl.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=5129c766255941d3be16a6828faa8f18 which seems to show that TfL owns the freehold for Tilling Road and in fact part of Brentfield Gardens, which is odd as Barnet enforce parking on BrentField Gardens too.

Would this info help me?

Screenshot:


23
(I couldn't find any info on the exact boundaries of the A41/A406 in terms of who owns what land)

24
One obvious issue to investigate is the exact boundary of the GLA road with the borough road, if the sign is the wrong side of the boundary then arguably the council cannot enforce without TFL's prior written consent, so I will check the designation orders.

You're an absolute genius for thinking of this possible way out, but it seems unlikely given that this prohibited turn at this particular junction has had numerous failed appeals at Tribunal and apparently is a cash-cow for Barnet!

Is this https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2000/1257/schedule/made the designation order you're referring to? It doesn't list Tilling Road unfortunately and in general appears to cover only the sections of Borough Road that actually cross a GLA road whereas here, Tilling Road is a few 10s of yards off a ramp serving the A41/A406 ...

25
So I sat down this morning to submit a representation and found the penalty had jumped up today to 100%/£130 shame I didn't submit last night  >:(

Regardless I have made a submission explaining the payment error and that I was waiting for a reply to that, and then the following quasi-appeal:

Quote
This junction on Tilling Road is just after an exit from the very busy A406 and the frequently-busy ramp and the "no left turn" is one of at least 12 signs that a motorist has to read when entering this extremely short section of road, see attached Google Street View photo.

This particular turning restricted is noted by Barnet to often tripped-up motorists see https://www.barnet.gov.uk/parking/parking-and-traffic-enforcement/cctv-traffic-enforcement/traffic-hotspot-examples at the bottom of page where Barnet Council write "Currently far too many drivers are attempting a banned left turn from Tilling Road into Brentfield Gardens, raising the risk of serious accident. We want to ensure the road here is safer for cars, for pedestrians and for the residents of Brentfield Gardens." It has previously been reported in the press that this junction and prohibited turn nets the council a large percentage of its total PCN penelty revenue.

I appreciate that the sign may neverltheless be legal, however please use your discretion to treat this as an appeal and cancel this PCN, or otherwise, if rejected, please offer me the discounted rate given that I intended and tried to pay the PCN as outlined above.

Let's see ...!

26
no I have not yet made a representation. the discount might have been extended because I tried to pay this just before the deadline but made an error with the payment which I reported, so it's not paid but perhaps in limbo pending their reply about the payment issue. I believe I can still make representations

27
And apparently has always been cash cow for the council probably due to the amount of signs and because it's so soon after coming off the busy A406.

See e.g. https://www.barnet.gov.uk/parking/parking-and-traffic-enforcement/cctv-traffic-enforcement/traffic-hotspot-examples (bottom of page)

28
Interestingy this local news article from 2017 shows that people have always been tripped up by this junction https://www.times-series.co.uk/news/15676382.barnet-council-earns-17m-at-tilling-road-junction-over-one-year/

29
text reads:

Thank you for your letter, which was received by the Council on 01/09/2023.
Following payment of £65.00 on 19/08/2023 in relation to this PCN, this Notice has been paid in full.
As payment of the outstanding charge has been made, the liability of the penalty charge has been accepted.and the case closed.
If you wish to reopen the case and challenge the PCN, a refund will be issued for the amount of £65.00 and any challenge received will be considered.
Please note, that as the Notice to Owner has been issued, any challenge will be at the statutory rate (£130.00) and if rejected, the full amount will be due, not the discounted rate the PCN has been paid at previously.
If you wish to challenge the PCN, please contact us confirming this and submitting a formal representation in relation to the PCN.
If no response is received within 14 days of the date of this letter, we will consider this case closed.
Yours sincerely

30
unbinned thanks so much

Pages: 1 [2] 3