31
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Havering - 53J - PCN
« on: July 09, 2026, 12:42:13 am »
Just the verification code, case number and name will do. PM.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: PCN issued by Havering council - entering in the road on restricted timings
« on: July 08, 2026, 10:59:15 pm »
I will deal with it tomorrow. Pm to be sent now.
33
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: RB Kingston, Code 27 Parked in a special enforcement area ajaceny to footway, cycle track or verge...
« on: July 08, 2026, 10:57:51 pm »Kingston is Hippo's manor so check with him what he's thinking.
They currently have a serious problem re one of the most important documents in the game/process.
34
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: PCN issued by Havering council - entering in the road on restricted timings
« on: July 07, 2026, 01:20:19 pm »Thank you.
A little confused, on what grounds should one appeal to London Tribunals? or one should make the representation as described in PCN? if so, what grounds.
@tincombe - you mentioned something about the dates and said thankgodness it is in our favour, how can one take this forward please?
I will PM you and do this case for you. DO NOT PAY!
35
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: RB Kingston, Code 27 Parked in a special enforcement area ajaceny to footway, cycle track or verge...
« on: July 07, 2026, 01:18:36 pm »
Do not pay. Need all PCN and VRM details and the original PCN.
36
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Camden - Code 52M - Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle (no motor vehicles)
« on: July 07, 2026, 01:15:30 pm »
So we go to the Tribunal and I offer to assist pro bono. Their website is ****.
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/camden-route-restricted-to-certain-vehicles-tottenham-court-w-howland-street/msg123697/#msg123697
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/camden-route-restricted-to-certain-vehicles-tottenham-court-w-howland-street/msg123697/#msg123697
37
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge, code 47j stopped on a restricted bus stop, Clayhall Avenue
« on: July 07, 2026, 01:03:11 pm »
I put you to strict proof that this bus stop is legally signed. If you are unable to do so, please cancel the PCN.
38
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Camden - Route restricted to certain vehicles - Tottenham Court w Howland Street
« on: July 06, 2026, 12:14:13 pm »
PM sent: all PCN please.
39
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1
« on: July 06, 2026, 11:20:36 am »So do I because the adjudicator, correctly IMO, dealt with the issue of liability first. Maybe one day authorities will realise that they may not just pay lip service to the 'Owner Liability' regs. But I won't be holding my breath.
She did so because I brought it up first to get the hearing concluded asap. I did not want to go on about "collateral crap" for ages.
40
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge - 53J - term time only sign
« on: July 05, 2026, 10:19:51 pm »
I am tempted to apply for costs in light of the below and I invited them to do a DNC.
Dear James Bond
Freedom of Information Act 2000
Thank you for your request for information received on 16 April 2026
Request
Though not explicitly stated in your Freedom of Information Request, I assume that you are referring to
the removal of the wording “Term-time only” from the blue signage located at the entrance to a School
Streets zone.
1. How long had the old sign (attachment 1) been in place throughout the borough?
The blue signage (in some locations red signage) was installed at existing and subsequent School Streets
schemes from 17 October 2022.
2.At how many locations in the borough?
There were 7 existing School Streets schemes on 17 October 2022.
There are now 29 School Streets schemes across the Borough.
3.The income derived from the same? That is from their inception to the present day.
We can only provide income from School Streets from 01 May 2023.
For this period (01/05/23 to date) £7,967,566.91 has been received.
4.When was the new sign (attachment 2) introduced?
The wording “Term-time only” was taped over during the school summer holiday in 2025. It would have come
into effect on Monday 1 September 2025 when the Autumn term commenced.
5.At how many locations in the borough? (I assume this will equate to 2 above.)
At all School Streets locations.
6.Why was it altered?
The text “term-time only” has been covered up, as whilst the Council thought that it was being helpful to drivers
by including the phrase “term-time only” on signage, to reduce the number of PCNs issued, drivers are telling
us that it is causing confusion. Hence, it was covered over.
There has been no change to the enforcement regime. School Streets are just enforced during term-time only.
Redbridge term dates can be found at https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/schools/term-dates/.
7.The income from the same? That is from their inception to the present day.
In this period £2,588,725.53 has been received.
007's response:
Dear Parking Services
I refer to the attached.
In light of its contents, I invite you to reimburse all recipients of PCNs with the illegal wording, including two of my clients due to perverse decisions by two adjudicators.
Should you not agree to do so, I shall be taking the matter further via an official complaint.
You know who I am and I take this matter very seriously.
If you are unable to deal with this, please forward it to the relevant department.
Yours faithfully
007
My real name is Trouble. Big Trouble.
I don't have a ticket re Redbridge so cannot take them to the High Court; but Ombudsman will do.
Dear James Bond
Freedom of Information Act 2000
Thank you for your request for information received on 16 April 2026
Request
Though not explicitly stated in your Freedom of Information Request, I assume that you are referring to
the removal of the wording “Term-time only” from the blue signage located at the entrance to a School
Streets zone.
1. How long had the old sign (attachment 1) been in place throughout the borough?
The blue signage (in some locations red signage) was installed at existing and subsequent School Streets
schemes from 17 October 2022.
2.At how many locations in the borough?
There were 7 existing School Streets schemes on 17 October 2022.
There are now 29 School Streets schemes across the Borough.
3.The income derived from the same? That is from their inception to the present day.
We can only provide income from School Streets from 01 May 2023.
For this period (01/05/23 to date) £7,967,566.91 has been received.
4.When was the new sign (attachment 2) introduced?
The wording “Term-time only” was taped over during the school summer holiday in 2025. It would have come
into effect on Monday 1 September 2025 when the Autumn term commenced.
5.At how many locations in the borough? (I assume this will equate to 2 above.)
At all School Streets locations.
6.Why was it altered?
The text “term-time only” has been covered up, as whilst the Council thought that it was being helpful to drivers
by including the phrase “term-time only” on signage, to reduce the number of PCNs issued, drivers are telling
us that it is causing confusion. Hence, it was covered over.
There has been no change to the enforcement regime. School Streets are just enforced during term-time only.
Redbridge term dates can be found at https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/schools/term-dates/.
7.The income from the same? That is from their inception to the present day.
In this period £2,588,725.53 has been received.
007's response:
Dear Parking Services
I refer to the attached.
In light of its contents, I invite you to reimburse all recipients of PCNs with the illegal wording, including two of my clients due to perverse decisions by two adjudicators.
Should you not agree to do so, I shall be taking the matter further via an official complaint.
You know who I am and I take this matter very seriously.
If you are unable to deal with this, please forward it to the relevant department.
Yours faithfully
007
My real name is Trouble. Big Trouble.
I don't have a ticket re Redbridge so cannot take them to the High Court; but Ombudsman will do.
41
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1
« on: July 05, 2026, 10:18:21 pm »
If Garry's toe met Sally's mouth......
Efkaristo e parakalo file mou.
Thanks you and please my friend.
Efkaristo e parakalo file mou.
Thanks you and please my friend.
42
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge, code 47j stopped on a restricted bus stop, Clayhall Avenue
« on: July 05, 2026, 08:54:30 pm »
You cannot require them to consider each point: HALTON CASE.
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2023/303.pdf
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2023/303.pdf
43
The Flame Pit / Re: Daft adjudication decision
« on: July 05, 2026, 01:00:46 pm »Iwas under the impression that the contravention in yellow box cases only occurred if the vehicle was stopped due to the presence of another vehicle blocking the exit.
If this is not the case, then if someone runs out in the road in front of you on a yellow box and you stop, you'd be guilty of a contravention.
Total madness.
@Korting: "Complaints@londoncouncils.gov.uk" <complaints@londoncouncils.gov.uk>
44
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Bromley, yellow box junction, High Street Bromley (Sth)/Police Station
« on: July 05, 2026, 12:58:54 pm »So basically, the review process might as well not exist.@Incandescent: "Complaints@londoncouncils.gov.uk" <complaints@londoncouncils.gov.uk>
Is there any process to sack adjudicators that continue to make basic errors of law ? Recently we've already seen an adjudicator refuse an appeal re a Yellow Box Junction where the vehicle had perforce to stop on the box to get the gate opened, and not because there was a stationary vehicle in front of it, (the YBJ NOT being at the junction of two or more roads, yet another error). With adjudicators like this, London Tribunals will soon be a laughing stock for the public, although the councils will no doubt be enjoying the perverse decisions.
45
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lon. Bor.Havering PCN for Non display blue badge. Appealed now received Charge certificate .
« on: July 05, 2026, 12:56:13 pm »
A phantom charge certificate is even worse.