Free Traffic Legal Advice

The Guru is doing a BBC Radio interview tomorrow morning.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/kingston-council-yellow-box-junction-b1285263.html

@PCN ticket. What does the payment say at present?

Quote from: fahim128 on June 06, 2026, 05:48:45 pm

Really could use any help!

OK, fine, but the regulars on here are all volunteers and give their time freely.

If nobody posts and you're getting near the deadline, just submit it. It reads well enough, but it will be rejected whatever its content. Thats how councils ruthlessly game the system - refuse reps, re-offer discount, and watch the money flow in. Most people, (like about 95%) just cough-up being scared of the adjudicators, and also the doubling of their financial risk. Cash from PCN penalties even with most paid at the discounted rate net London councils and TfL over £600 million a year; a Nice Little Earner.

99% actually and less than 1% fight.

So I already submitted the letter that I posted 2 days ago - what should I do now? Also, it’s the 6th June now so I’ve passed the 4th June deadline anyway?

That's fine which is why it is showing £160 in that case. But I advise putting mine in as a supplementary and/or retracting the other one.

Been busy with big fish and heat sorry. Like a Pre action protocol letter to RBK.

https://www.ftla.uk/news-press-articles/that-kingston-box-junction/msg120975/#msg120975

I have sent you a PM and seriously suggest you let me personally take care of this for you.

2250205130  They failed to attend which they MUST.

At this scheduled personal hearing the Appellant was represented by Mr Morgan, who appeared in person via MS Teams.

The Enforcement Authority did not attend and was not represented, either in vision, by telephone, or in person.

....................
I note that the Enforcement Authority has produced a witness statement from its authorised officer but Paragraph 7(6) of Schedule 1 to the 1996 Act provides that nothing in sub-paragraph (1) or (4) [Admissibility of certain evidence] above makes a document admissible as evidence in proceedings under paragraph 6 above unless a copy of it has not less than 7 days before the hearing, been served on the appellant; and nothing in those paragraphs makes a document admissible as evidence of anything other than the matters shown on a record produced by a prescribed device if that person, not less than three days before the hearing or within such further time as the traffic adjudicator may in special circumstances allow, serves a notice on the council requiring attendance at the hearing or trial of the person who signed the document.

The Appellant’s representative served notice within the prescribed time for the attendance of the named officer, but they have not attended.

Therefore, I cannot find as facet that on this occasion a contravention did occur.

Accordingly, this appeal must be allowed.

Hold fire.

Forget all that.

I refer to my informal challenge and require you to consider it again as formal representations against the Enforcement Notice save for one amendment which I itemise as 1. below.

1. For the avoidance of doubt, there is no evidence of the sign to diagram 958 allegedly passed in the video.

2. The alleged incursion did not occur and the sign to diagram 959 is not placed where it should be i.e. at the start of the solid white line.

In light of the above, I request cancellation of the PCN and EN.



If you want my assistance, please follow my advice to the letter. PM sent. DEADLINE WAS 4TH JUNE.

Just checked website still shows £160. Do it now.

VA17SJO
Remaining Balance
£160.00

* Mandatory Field


Payment For
Penalty Charge Notice
PCN Number
TT61001743
Amount * £160.00

@Traffic Fairies I need to see the webcodes to assist you. Please also reply to my PM. And we need the whole of the PCN are there are issues!

Failure to consider. Keep going.

Tonight at 7.30 p.m.

https://moderngov.kingston.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=702&MId=10397