Skip to content

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Incandescent

Pages: 1 ... 507 508 [509] 510 511 ... 521
7621
Hi,

Yes, sorry still here.

I've lodged an appeal over the weekend and will let this forum know how the outcome goes.

It's unfortunate that it looks as if I was driving too fast and remained in the bust lane but in the time I had to react I felt it safer to stay in the bus lane oppose to swerving back into the lane. The bus lane literally finishes just out of shot and I had to enter that lane too.
Papers-based, or telephone hearing ?

7623
Arer you sure there is no other sign ? Although the carriageway has "Electric Vehicles Only", there must be a sign or the offence did occur..

7624
The council seem to have repainted the road markings but failed to repaint the double-yellows inside the loading bay. Clearly, as a loading bay, you can't park there on a BB. The repainted double yellows also have kerb blips for No Loading. I have to say that I don't think a win is guaranteed, but I have yet to study the PCN.

I suspect the council forgot to remove the double-yellow lines in the loading bay, or they covered them over and the covering has worn off.

7625
Their only evidence of the alleged contravention is a video taken from a CCTV camera. You need to obtain this and post it here.  If you don't feel confident enough, then post your car reg number and PCN number and somebody here will obtain it. Something seems quite odd here. A PCN for the ULEZ I could understand as the signs are clear,  but not a restriction on motor vehicles as there are no signs.

If you're running out of time, submit representations stating that at the location concerned there are no signs that bar motorvehicles, so you cannot understand how the PCN has been issued to you.

7626
That’s the one I have to hand. The back was just about how to make reps but I’m not at home atm
We have often found fatal errors in the routine stuff on the back of a PCN that makes it void.  Most London ones are now OK, but we don't often see PCNs from outside London, so it's always best to check them for errors.

Having looked at the Oxford ZEZ, all non-electric vehicles must pay. They intend to make the zone larger in 2025, to cover all of central Oxford. Barmy !  But they get away with it.

7627
Please post the PCN, (all sides)  as we have yet to see an Oxford one for this low emissions zone. Only blank out name and address.

BTW
Quote
"I know nothing of all this ridiculous emissions stuff!"
You do need to rapidly get up to speed on these zones because they're going in all over the place, and the councils are dining out very generously on the proceeds. Just so you are aware, a petrol car built before about 2003 and diesel before 2015 are not compliant with the emissions limits for these zones. The recent ULEX expansion in London covers the whole of the London area and the PCN penalties are eye-watering.

The Oxford scheme is for zero emissions vehicles, so even a low-emission vehicle must pay. This is the only zero zone I'm aware of.

https://www.oxford.gov.uk/zez

Oxford has gone completely barmy, but barminess seems to be catching on !

7628
From your narrative, it is very likely that the PCNs are for passing a sign forbidding motorvehicles, and nothing whatever to do with the ULEZ. The signs are commonly called "the flying motorbike" sign" with a motorbike symbol above a car symbol. If you passed a sign like this you'll get PCNs every time you pass one.

GSV is not sufficiently up-to-date, so we'd need more photos from you, I'm afraid. The photo of the 40 speed limit sign seems to be a variable display sign, so we need to see what else it displays.

Sorry for lack of advice, but we need to see what is there now at the location on the PCN.

7629
Our administrator, CP8759 is closely involved with the judicial review on all similar cases, so will no doubt commment soon.  It seems that TfL are now playing hard-ball with PCN recipients with identical circumstances.  What you will need to do is register an appeal at London Tribunals. The JR date is not far off, as I understand it. I would certainly not pay the PCN.

7630
Assuming your narrative is correct;  with no discount re-offered with the rejection, it is now a no-brainer to now take them to adjudication, the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, as the penalty remains the same and there are no extra costs.

You say the auto-pay account was fully funded, they say it wasn't, so you will need to provide evidence to the tribunal that the account was in credit and failure to collect the toll payment is the fault of DART.

Are you sure the debit card end date had not been reached ? There may have been funds in the debit card account, but the debut card number has to be updated with the new card.

7631
Is your vehicle definitely non-compliant with the ULEZ compliancy rules ? There have been one or two cases where there was a dispute about compliancy.

7632
Very difficult to fight these as you were either there or you weren't. I assume this is just one of the two PCNs. It might be prudent to post the other 3 pages so we can check it for errors, but it's thin gruel at the moment, I'm afraid unless our intrepid adminstrator delves into the ULEZ regs and finds a killer appeal, there is little to go on. Did the PCN arrive like that with an unreadable title ?

7633
Post the PCN (all sides), please, we need to see it as we don't often see PCNs from Bridgend. It may contain fatal errors.

Please also post-up a GSV link to the location.

7634
I see they've batted-away your reps based on missing out one of the statutory grounds. So they did actually read your reps !

7635
This used to be a Mon-Fri restriction and less hours too, but was changed fairly recently to the present restriction. 
OP, did you ever look at the sign when parking all those years ?

You posted in Pepipoo and MMV Redux found the update, which is part of a raft of changes
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4400304
I then trawled through it and found the changed restriction: -
Quote
(v) in Old Town, the north-east side, (i) extend the operational times of the existing loading bay opposite The Polygon so that it operates on Monday to Sunday between 7am and 7pm; and (ii) relocate the existing loading bay opposite Nos. 32 to 36a Old Town to opposite Nos. 28 to 32 Old Town; and (iii) introduce double yellow line “at any time” waiting restrictions opposite Nos. 32 to 36a Old Town;

So if you're up for it, Mr Mustard will diligently represent you at London Tribunals.

Pages: 1 ... 507 508 [509] 510 511 ... 521