1
Private parking tickets / Re: UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: December 28, 2024, 10:40:34 am »
Thank you for that. That has now been sent to UKPC
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Private parking tickets / Re: UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: December 24, 2024, 12:47:54 pm »
In fact, I've just noticed it's exactly the same as their previous response
3
Private parking tickets / Re: UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: December 24, 2024, 12:40:09 pm »
They have taken some time but finally responded with:
Thank you for your recent correspondence in relation to parking charge reference *************.
To assist us in making a decision regarding your appeal, please confirm the full name and address of the driver to our Appeals Department within seven days of the date of this letter.
Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 discusses the recovery of unpaid parking charges. It allows parking operators to hold the registered keeper liable to pay unpaid parking charges if the operator has not been provided the name and a serviceable address of the driver.
This information may be confirmed by submitting another appeal on our website at www.ukpcappeals.co.uk, or by post to the address overleaf. Please ensure that if writing to us by post that you include the parking charge reference number and vehicle registration.
Failure to provide this information will give us no alternative other than to make our final decision based on the previous information received. At this stage a POPLA verification code will be provided.
The parking charge has been placed on hold whilst under appeal and may be settled in full at the current PCN rate of £60.00.
Thank you for your recent correspondence in relation to parking charge reference *************.
To assist us in making a decision regarding your appeal, please confirm the full name and address of the driver to our Appeals Department within seven days of the date of this letter.
Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 discusses the recovery of unpaid parking charges. It allows parking operators to hold the registered keeper liable to pay unpaid parking charges if the operator has not been provided the name and a serviceable address of the driver.
This information may be confirmed by submitting another appeal on our website at www.ukpcappeals.co.uk, or by post to the address overleaf. Please ensure that if writing to us by post that you include the parking charge reference number and vehicle registration.
Failure to provide this information will give us no alternative other than to make our final decision based on the previous information received. At this stage a POPLA verification code will be provided.
The parking charge has been placed on hold whilst under appeal and may be settled in full at the current PCN rate of £60.00.
4
Private parking tickets / Re: UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: November 19, 2024, 05:37:31 pm »
Haha, I’ll have that sent them as the reply then 🤣
5
Private parking tickets / Re: UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: November 19, 2024, 10:27:33 am »
A reply from UKPC has now been received. What would be the next step please?
6
Private parking tickets / Re: UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: October 23, 2024, 07:07:53 pm »
If the appeal is won is the £35 fee from Enterprise refunded or is that lost regardless?
7
Private parking tickets / Re: UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: October 23, 2024, 04:03:41 pm »
The options for 'appeal reason' are:
Blue Badge Holder
Working on site
Genuine customer
Other
So 'other' has been selected and then 'Relationship to vehicle' has to be answered with the only options being:
Driver
Registered keeper
Driver and registered keeper
So what should be selected here?
Blue Badge Holder
Working on site
Genuine customer
Other
So 'other' has been selected and then 'Relationship to vehicle' has to be answered with the only options being:
Driver
Registered keeper
Driver and registered keeper
So what should be selected here?
8
Private parking tickets / Re: UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: October 23, 2024, 03:29:50 pm »
Yes, it was the hirer that received the notice and that one page (front and back) is all that was received.
9
Private parking tickets / UKPC, not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space, Metrocentre Gateshead
« on: October 23, 2024, 03:01:50 pm »
The driver received this yesterday through the post (22nd October) from UKPC for 'not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space' at the Metrocentre in Gateshead. The 'Parking Charge Date' is 10th October and the letter is dated 18th October. This is a hire van.
The driver entered the car park about 6pm ish and left about 8:30pm ish and they parked like this because the van would not fit in any of the bays and because it's a hire van did not want to get it damaged with other people banging it with their doors etc so tried to find a space well away from the entrance and away from anyone, however, clearly in some of the photo's other cars ended up parking at that end as well.
The driver went into the Metrocentre to do some shopping and get some food.
Any help from you guys is appreciated, even if it isn't what the driver wants to hear. Thanks
GSV: https://www.instantstreetview.com/@54.95628,-1.671591,100.68h,-6.78p,1z,js5D64LMuUhohqVAFO3Pkw
The driver entered the car park about 6pm ish and left about 8:30pm ish and they parked like this because the van would not fit in any of the bays and because it's a hire van did not want to get it damaged with other people banging it with their doors etc so tried to find a space well away from the entrance and away from anyone, however, clearly in some of the photo's other cars ended up parking at that end as well.
The driver went into the Metrocentre to do some shopping and get some food.
Any help from you guys is appreciated, even if it isn't what the driver wants to hear. Thanks
GSV: https://www.instantstreetview.com/@54.95628,-1.671591,100.68h,-6.78p,1z,js5D64LMuUhohqVAFO3Pkw
10
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: PCN at double yellow line on Iris Avenue in Bexleyheath
« on: June 19, 2024, 10:58:42 am »
Cesur, try using a different browser
11
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: TFL 46:Stopped where prohibited (on red route or clearway) Eastern Ave IG2
« on: April 29, 2024, 10:01:47 am »
I think I can see the bay markings on your first photo CP
12
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Leeds City Council PCN Sunday Disabled bay Time clock "wrong"
« on: March 17, 2024, 02:44:09 pm »
QUOTE: Exactly, CEO's CANT know individual circumstances, and therefore, mitigating personal circumstances are a valid retort
Nah, that would make the clock absolutely pointless in every case due to CEO's having to assume every driver struggled with the time. I can see that argument being given very short shrift indeed. Presumably if you were going for that argument then you would need proof, like medical records for example.
Nah, that would make the clock absolutely pointless in every case due to CEO's having to assume every driver struggled with the time. I can see that argument being given very short shrift indeed. Presumably if you were going for that argument then you would need proof, like medical records for example.
13
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Leeds City Council PCN Sunday Disabled bay Time clock "wrong"
« on: March 17, 2024, 01:16:59 pm »
Is that a joke rep?? How do they expect CEO's to know every drivers personal circumstances??
And as far as I know CEO's aren't 'incentivized' at all. Makes no difference to them whether they issue one or fifty.
Surely that rep can't end up being a winner.
And as far as I know CEO's aren't 'incentivized' at all. Makes no difference to them whether they issue one or fifty.
Surely that rep can't end up being a winner.
14
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis - Camrose Avenue (Again!)
« on: March 02, 2024, 04:05:37 pm »
Can I just ask what is the point of this bus lane/gate? I've seen this one on here a few times now. It looks incredibly short, only fit one bus, and even then it looks like they have to give way to the cars passing on the right. Looks like it doesn't actually serve any purpose.
15
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: North Yorkshire Council, code 35 not displaying a valid disc, St Sepulchre Street, Scarborough
« on: February 08, 2024, 08:08:08 pm »
Anybody got any input on this before I send it off when I get home from work later?