Reckon I should write this in the appeal? Tbh this is what I was thinking, ‘car club’ isn’t a vehicle type in the same way motorcycle, van, car etc would be

does this seem like a reasonable set of notes to make for an appeal?

"I parked in a resident bay as I was at home to visit my elderly father, and I believed I had attached a virtual visitor permit to the vehicle concerned. With regards to the wording of the PCN, I was never issues a physical permit to display on the car - therefore how was I supposed to avoid the alleged contravention of parking 'without a valid virtual permit and without clearly displaying a valid physical permit' if I was never issued a physical permit to display?"

Doesn't the system have a number of pre-purchased vouchers or can you just buy one ad hoc.

You can try replicating what you did but I presume you have since used/bought vouchers successfully.

I don't think the code 12/16 will fly.

But as I noted the contravention is:

Parked in a resident parking place without a valid virtual permit and without clearly displaying a valid physical permit


If they don't supply physical permits you can't meet the requirement. Is my view.

good to know, will try and use this to inform my appeal.

It’s a bit of a pain as there’s no way to view the history on Tower Hamlets website - I can’t see why it wouldn’t have gone through as it’s a free permit so there’s no payment required

That's correct - I use the virtual vouchers to park the car there.
RE wording being wrong - would I gave any grounds to stand on with this?