Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - JimmyM

Pages: [1]

Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / London Borough of Brent - 31 - Yellow box junction - Salusbury Rd j/w Hartland Rd NW6

« on: December 11, 2025, 12:20:54 pm »

Good afternoon ,

I have received a PCN for a yellow box junction at the location mentioned. I have not worked out how to upload the video but it's worse than I recalled at the time. A vehicle enters Salusbury Road from my right and as the traffic moves off South it stops with the vehicle stopping in the space I was anticipating to be free.

I have done some research on this (very useful) forum and note that many of the appeals focus on Section 4 (eight) of the relevant legislation and the difference in timeframes of 'date of notice' and 'date of service' effectively creating two distinct deadlines that contradict each other.

I have attached the PCN and hoping the collective subject matter experts can comment as to whether I have a case based on this. Additionally, the website under Representation Grounds only provides one box entitled 'General Representation' and not the statutory ones included on the PCN.

The box junction extends beyond the junction on the nearside outside Starbucks but I don't know if that's sufficient for a representation as it doesn't conform to the regulation design (Traffic signs and something but I can't recall the exact legislation).

PCN via One Drive

https://1drv.ms/b/c/226a65a9954e031c/IQDEz04gzYJNSJRiIw6siDCoASqsUOPxFaJbkfHVFJL_2OY?e=zeZd0N
https://1drv.ms/b/c/226a65a9954e031c/IQAnRXBTIy6cT6zM9aUrNQ7uAU1QHZnrRoTWtw0I15aHBdA?e=AkZKGb
https://1drv.ms/b/c/226a65a9954e031c/IQAFzuj7ZrEXRJ1GWDLrMRMkAewR7nA9nf7fzR2udzdertA?e=hBgQjr

Google Location

https://maps.app.goo.gl/qf2DVeikddgS4cdj7
https://maps.app.goo.gl/T6WajmEK86JwV24p9

The video may work from here;

https://brent.tarantoportal.com/PCN/PCN/ViewImages

BT27358726
WD08HNL

The video is pretty damning and I'm rather embarrased TBH! But the moped managed to get round.....

I have looked at London Tribunals 2250161512 and 2250426286 and crossing my fingers that there's a loophole that I can exploit.

Many thanks,

James

Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / LB of Brent - 53 - Kempe Rd j/w Chamberlayne Rd - Failing to comply with pedestrian zone (school).

« on: May 16, 2024, 05:29:56 pm »

Good afternoon,

I received a PCN for the alleged contravention of entering Kempe Road from Chamberlayne Rd NW10 when access was restricted to specific times.

I was bemused at getting the PCN and attended the location to see where I'd gone wrong. The area was subject to extensive roadworks and has been for some time and the traffic flow on Chamberlayne Road was controlled by temporary traffic lights. As I looked North from the j/w Harvist Rd it was clear that there was no advance signage of the no right turn into Kempe Road. In fact the sign that was on the west kerb was turned round 180 degrees and was facing in the wrong direction and only traffic travelling South would see it. Due to the ATS controlling traffic flow the northbound traffic had to travel north in the south carriageway. Buses were stacked up as Chamberlayne Rd hosts routes 6, 28, 52, 302 and 452 - these are double deckers. The route 187 also uses the route albeit it's a single decker. So it would seem that I turned into the road with no advance warning and from my driving position (right hand drive) I was close to east kerb and so with the acute angled view into the junction the signage in the mouth of the junction of Kempe Road is effectively side on to my vision.. The signage would benefit from being 'toed in' slightly to assist drivers.

Having been successful at Tribunal with a TFL matter (red route in Camden) I sent in my reps satisfied that my photos and mitigation would make Brent see sense. I have today (day 52) received their NoR.

I doubt they've even read the reps and there may well have been a procedural impropriety with the original PCN that I missed (the confusing 'now payable before the end of 28 days beginning with the date of this notice and the second sentence starting 'date of service is considered to be two working days).

Anyway, I feel that I have a good case at Tribunal but happy to be corrected.

And apologies with the tight time scales!

PCN

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Tx1100OPU81xvTTRz_YxhLt4H0vunXcp/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UKhtDNLcSrRW0YeNctBAW_VD4wWxqrRT/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UCuGAxRuwdut-5Cb7L-25_qrxA_KuMeN/view?usp=drive_link

NoR

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TqR3H_cdC0mE8Rb_QwR-pxVlpaOcrfDQ/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UCaKCFt3-rzjQ3xrtUXdDuAZ6C77-wg-/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U9BurllHBoMcJeknRaBKQ5eZvAsM4B6H/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TzOF65RJJ_R9qLeE64vNqwd2QXJmYAkb/view?usp=drive_link

The pics that Brent have used date from October 2023 and the positioning is not from where I would enter the road.

Google maps image.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/VbmFrKcQGj95zg2S9

I will post my reps on a second post as this is getting too long.

Many thanks for looking!

Kind regards,

James.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / TfL pursuing an alleged red route violation (issued by means of CCT) at Tribunal

« on: July 18, 2023, 07:03:25 pm »

Good evening,

I was issued a 46 red route PCN and made an initial appeal - admittedly this was rather hurried. I then happened upon the Tribunal decision of 23rd May that stayed the use of CCTV to enforce parking violations on red routes was not appropriate. I elected to go to the Tribunal citing this 'procedural impropriety' as a way to appeal..I have a date of 31st July for the hearing but on receiving TfL's bundle I find they're challenging the panel's decision. I find myself facing the tribunal when TfL are arguing over the legality of the decision - I don't believe this is fair under the circumstances.

I have added a link to my original post on Pepipoo and invite further comment.

http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=150411&pid=1787272&st=0&#entry1787272

Many thanks,

James