Show Posts - danvic

Oh sorry I realise now that the highlighter on the PCN may make it unreadable.. this is the contravention.."52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle (motor vehicles)"

Someone suggested this approach may work??   any ideas?Dear Hackney Council,I am writing in response to PCN reference [insert reference], which cites contravention code 52M: "Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle (motor vehicles)." I conditionally agree to payment if you can supply  further clarification and supporting evidence to confirm my liability.1. Prohibited Vehicles: Please specify which types of vehicles are prohibited under this restriction and which are permitted. Provide the relevant legislation that supports this prohibition.2. Nature of the Contravention: Is this considered a contravention, offence, or crime? Clarifying the legal basis is essential.3. Evidence: Can it be verified that the footage or images have not been tampered with, or that fake plates were not used? Additionally, confirm the calibration and accuracy of the cameras involved.4. Witnesses and Crime Report: Please provide the names of any witnesses and the official crime report related to this alleged contravention. Was any victim identified? Has there been any harm, loss or damage? 5. Legal Justification: The Bill of Rights 1689 clearly states that forfeitures of fines before conviction are null and void. I require confirmation that the enforcement of this fine aligns with both my human rights as protected under the Bill of Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Please clarify whether a court conviction is required in this instance.6. Liability Order: Kindly provide a copy of the liability order, signed by a judge, as well as any supporting legislation that allows Hackney Council to enforce this fine.I look forward to your prompt response with the requested information.

thanks so much.  I only blanked the personal details.

Thanks.  Here is the PCN :  https://postimg.cc/BXbBL4hp

Hi, just received this pcn from hackney for failing to comply with prohibition on certain types of vehicle.Did not notice the very confusing red circle with car/motorbike symbols.  Also there are cars parked on that road so don't understand how some cars are allowed there but not others.I looked at the photo/video on their site. As you can see on the pcn, one photo is completely black apart from a vague semblance of the number plate.  The cctv footage shows the car but is so fuzzy on the video that the number plate is not even discernible.Is this worth disputing ?  What grounds could I contest it on?Link to PCN : https://postimg.cc/BXbBL4hpMany thanks

Big thank you for all your amazing assistance !  They "investigated the appeal based on the information submitted" and cancelled it.Really appreciate it. 

Please let me know what response you'd suggest. Also the original notice was sent to lease company and not to our company so never benefitted from their initial appeal period !

Yes please if you think its worth a shot. Thankyou

attached pics of the 2 "copies of correspondence" they attached with that reply [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

I received this email back on Friday :Good day,We can confirm that all our notices comply with the Protection of Freedoms act and this was all served to the address that the letter of claim was issued to. So we kindly request for evidence that this has not been complied with.In the meantime, please see attached all notices issued to you in relation to this charge, and we also wish to bring to your attention that the time to appeal this charge has unfortunately expired. We therefore reject your denials and please refer to the letter of claim within your possession for next steps. UKPC Litigation Team

Perfect, thanks so much

 Do I need to preface the email/letter to them with "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" or not necessary?

Thankyou everyone. Really appreciate your assistance. I'll give it a shot!

Thankyou. They did NOT provide any of those documents to us.

Thankyou. I've attached scans of the initial letter that was merely forwarded to our company from the lease company, the next letter that then came directly from UKPC and the follow-on.    Hope that helps.  In this instance the car was driven for personal purposes. [ Guests cannot view attachments ]