3. Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - jojo1868

Pages: [1]
1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / TFL - ULEZ PCN - representation accepted
« on: November 23, 2023, 06:07:40 pm »
Following to my previous post(which I have deleted), I want to report my representation has been accepted.

For anyone looking to challenge ULEZ PCN, this might help.


[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]


Also, you can use FOI to find which appeal grounds has TFL accepted, those have higher chance to win the case.

Please don't use illegal signage as a reason, although the sign authorisation and TSRGD are quite vague about the charge information, TFL will definitely reject you and you'll need to push it to tribunal, which might not end well.

Thanks for all the members that have guided me, I won't achieve it without you.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

2
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
« on: November 12, 2023, 05:38:15 pm »
Quote from: BH1001 on November 12, 2023, 05:20:16 pm
Yes well it wouldn't surprise me if the regulations were left intentionally vague, especially the new authorisation for TfL

I've been over to take some pictures of the road and the signage and I think the latter is possibly defective.

The bottom of the sign is over 10 mtrs from ground level and therefore it is very difficult to see it clearly from the driver's perspective when turning right from Skid Hill Lane into Sheepbarn Lane, and because of the oblique angle of the sign and the height of it, it is impossible to see it at all once you've joined the road, (unless you are driving a convertible!)

There are no warning signs to be seen when approaching the junction along Skid Hill Lane so drivers are relying solely on that one sign that has been put up on the opposite side of the road, 10+ metres high and at an oblique angle when viewed from the road you are joining the ULEZ from - please see link to pictures

https://imgur.com/a/x6LoZOK

If anyone could possibly help with the best way to put the appeal together on these grounds that would be greatly appreciated.

Good luck with your appeal, hope you can beat the blood sucking TFL and the dictator mayor!

3
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
« on: November 12, 2023, 12:46:13 pm »
Quote from: BH1001 on November 11, 2023, 05:50:42 pm
Quick question

Is there a height stipulation in the signage regulations (i.e. the distance between the bottom of the sign and ground level) or has the DfT granted a free pass for all the ULEZ signage exempting them from adhering to any sort of regulation whatsoever?

Hey BH, I'm in the process to appeal as well, but I find the ULEZ sign authorisation and the TSRGD 2016 is rather confusing as well. I think in the 2022 authorisation, ULEZ sign need to follow it's equivalant signs to the standard that's designated in both the TSRGD 2016 and ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984. This would be a hard battle man, the standard are set a bit vague, at least in my understanding.

4
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Southwark Council - Baliff- Failing to comply with prohibition on type of vehicle
« on: November 08, 2023, 09:52:43 pm »
From my understanding that doesn't proof they have warrant, it only shows things has transfered to private enforcement agent. Have you ever receive a claim form from CNBC?

Pages: [1]