Show Posts - Skorenberg

Thank you so much for the help mate. That seems like good news. Here's the entire PCN I received as requested: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1272N96xnngyGvXuwWHUJuwtF8oZY5ZhI/view?usp=drivesdk

Fair point on the driving definetly not one of my finest moments should've held back to see if the coast was clear and taken the narrow section a little slower. I'm mostly going off what I've seen off other threads on this specific give way camera when I mention the blind summit and the signage lacking the required detail I'm basing it off points made by other members of the forum. Such as this: https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/lambeth-salters-hill-failing-to-give-way-37-j-280424/msg22309/#msg22309

Good Afternoon All,I've recently received a PCN for "Failing to give way to oncoming vehicles" at Salters Hill and was wondering if it some of the experts here would mind weighing in as I believe I am not at fault. I have provided details of the PCN below. I was travelling in a convoy behind a silver car and a large white van. The van blocked the view through the tunnel. By the time it cleared, I was already committed to the narrow sectio and it was too late to brake. I clear the section just as the car opposite arrives causing minimal slow down and the car opposite does not even have to stop.Based of other posts I have seen on this forum for this junction I've decided to fight the PCN with these arguments and would greatly appreciate the opinons of the experts:Sightlines: The "blind summit" combined with the white van meant the oncoming car was invisible at the decision point and I only became aware of its presence once I was committed.Signage: The "Give Priority" sign lacks a distance plate, so I am arguing the restriction applies only to the arch itself (which I cleared).Camera Distortion: The CCTV uses a telephoto lens, compressing the depth of field and making the oncoming car look much closer/more "imminent" than it actually was. Procedural Impropriety: The PCN wording conflates the statutory periods. It states the 28-day period for the increased charge begins with the "date of notice" and in small print on the other side it states date of service.I have attatched a copy of the PCN, a link to the video of the incident and the PCN number below.VIDEO LINK: https://pcnevidence.lambeth.gov.uk/pcnonline/videocache/fb298ff1-371c-47f5-8e9b-96c15c502f09.mp4MIRROR IN CASE INACCESSIBLE: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13lCO50tJ6h7zuHQTHfEw2JHR1LeGxFi-/view?usp=sharingSCAN OF LETTER: https://drive.google.com/file/d/19BUqfMbZljiV7ZeBS3RW8ibfZ1Mj1uX_/view?usp=drivesdkPCN NUMBER: MY PLATE: BD19 HMVMany Thanks,Sam