Free Traffic Legal Advice

@Hippocrates Thanks for your response.... Shall I just stick to this ... also the grounds on which website, sorry i'm a bit confused here.

I contest this PCN on the following grounds:

1. The PCN is Missing Mandatory Information
Under London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003, Section 4((v), a PCN must state:

“that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the 28 day period, an increased charge may be payable”
and
“that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice.”

This PCN fails to include the second requirement in full and instead uses wording that conflates payment and appeal timeframes, rendering the notice unclear. As the PCN omits mandatory statutory wording, it is invalid and must be cancelled.

2. Lack of Evidence of the Alleged Contravention
The CCTV evidence provided by the authority does not show my vehicle passing the relevant restriction signs. It merely shows the vehicle already inside the alleged restricted area.
Since the PCN is based upon a breach of a prohibition conveyed by prescribed signs, the absence of these signs in the evidence means the contravention has not been proven.

Given the above, I request that this PCN be cancelled.