Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Everyday Consumer

Pages: [1]
1
Adjudicator's Reasons
The appellant has not provided evidence to substantiate the witness statement declaration made to the Traffic Enforcement Centre as requested and has not established a right of appeal to the independent adjudicator.
The authority remains entitled to enforce the penalty of £120 and the daily charge of £X

2
I can’t find the witness statement submitted at the time having looked through emails just now but it was basically along the lines of the car in question is Euro 6 ULEZ compliant and when entering the registration number on the Bradford CAZ site this confirms the same. Screenshots to show were uploaded too.
This is in relation to where the car was previously used as a PHV but at the time of incident in question was insured under regular motor insurance with no PHV stickers or badges on the car.

The Traffic Tribunal response was as follows:

Following the witness statement you submitted to City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, we wrote to you offering a further 14 days to pay the penalty charge.
The penalty charge has not been paid. As a result, the case was referred to the adjudicator at the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
Please find enclosed the decision made by the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
The decision of the Adjudicator is final.

3
Hi,

After previously submitting a witness statement to appeal the CAZ received in Bradford the Traffic Penalty Tribunal adjudicator has rejected the appeal. The vehicle itself is a Euro 6 car so ULEZ exempt in the city, which was previously explained in the initial appeal submission but this seems to have been wrongly brushed off. What are my options now?

Thanks

Pages: [1]