Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - ParkingLobster72

Pages: [1] 2
2
I’ve had an email to say due to the weather the hearing has been moved to a court over an hour away instead of the one 20 mins away.

Will it hurt my case to ask them to postpone it until it can be heard closer?

I won’t be able to get there in time after dropping my daughter to school.

3
Are you able to ring the Court again today to see if the fee has been paid?

yes I can do that on the way home..

They have sent me this today:

INTRODUCTION
1. I am a Solicitor in the employment of Gladstones Solicitors Limited, who act for the Claimant in this
matter. I have conduct of this action, subject to the supervision of my principal. The matters to which I
refer within this witness statement are within my own knowledge or based on information provided to
me by my client within the course of my instruction, save where expressly stated to the contrary. I am
duly authorised by the Claimant to make this statement on their behalf.

2. I make this supplemental witness statement in response to matters raised for the first time within the
Defendant’s Witness Statement dated 19 June 2026.

3. Save where expressly admitted, the Claimant joins issue with the matters raised by the Defendant and
relies upon my witness statement dated 17 June 2026.
Driver Identity
4. The Defendant now asserts that she was not the driver of the vehicle on the material date and that the
vehicle was instead being used by her former partner.
5. This allegation was not pleaded within the Defendant’s Defence.
6. The Defence did not state that the Defendant was not the driver, did not identify any alternative driver
and did not rely upon any circumstances involving a former partner.

1

7. The Notice to Keeper expressly invited the Defendant, if she was not the driver, to provide the full
name and current serviceable address of the driver within 28 days so that liability could be transferred.
8. No such information was provided. Instead, the first allegation that another individual was driving
appears within the Defendant’s witness statement served shortly before the hearing, more than two
years after the material event and only after proceedings had been issued.
9. Had the Defendant identified the alleged driver within the period specified in the Notice to Keeper, the
Claimant would have had the opportunity to investigate that individual and consider recovery directly
from them. The Defendant’s late assertion has deprived the Claimant of that opportunity.
10. The Claimant respectfully submits that the Defendant cannot now seek to avoid liability by making a
late and unsupported assertion regarding an alleged driver whose identity was not notified to the
Claimant when requested. The allegation is unsupported by any documentary evidence, witness
evidence or other corroborative material and the Court is invited to attach limited weight to an
assertion raised for the first time more than two years after the material event and only shortly before
trial.
Keeper Liability
11. The Defendant asserts that the Claimant cannot establish liability against her as registered keeper.
12. The Defendant admits that she was the registered keeper of the vehicle at the material time.
13. The Claimant therefore maintains that keeper liability is available in this matter pursuant to
Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.
14. The Defendant identifies no specific defect in the Notice to Keeper, nor any particular provision of
Schedule 4 with which the Claimant is alleged to have failed to comply.
15. In those circumstances, the Defendant’s challenge to keeper liability amounts to a general
assertion by any identified statutory non-compliance or pleaded factual basis.
ANPR Evidence
16. The Defendant suggests that ANPR evidence alone is insufficient to establish a breach.
17. The Claimant does not rely solely upon ANPR timestamps. The Claimant also relies upon its
parking management records, which identified no payment associated with the vehicle registration
during the material parking event.
18. The vehicle was recorded entering the Site at 13:50 and exiting at 17:00, remaining on site for 3
hours and 10 minutes. No payment was identified in respect of that parking event.

2

19. The Defendant does not dispute the vehicle’s presence at the Site, the duration recorded, or that no
payment was made.
Claimant’s Non-Attendance
20. The Defendant criticises the Claimant’s decision not to attend the hearing and suggests that adverse
inferences should be drawn from that decision.
21. The Claimant has complied with the Small Claims Track procedure and has filed and served a Notice
of Non-Attendance pursuant to CPR 27.9.
22. The Civil Procedure Rules expressly permit a party to request that a claim be determined in its absence
where the relevant procedural requirements have been satisfied.
23. The Claimant respectfully submits that no adverse inference should be drawn from the proper exercise
of that procedural right.
Additional Costs
24. The Defendant challenges the additional costs claimed.
25. The Claimant maintains that the sums claimed are properly pleaded and recoverable. In the alternative,
should the Court decline to award any element of the additional costs claimed, the Claimant maintains
its entitlement to the principal parking charge, court fee, fixed legal costs and applicable interest.
26. In any event, the existence of a dispute regarding additional sums does not affect the Claimant’s
entitlement to recover the principal parking charge, applicable court fees and interest should the Court
find liability established.
27. Save as set out above, the Claimant relies upon the evidence and submissions already filed and served
and respectfully invites the Court to enter judgment in favour of the Claimant.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of
court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document
verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

4
The original NtK is massively non-compliant and this needs to be drawn to the attention of the Court if this hearing does go ahead.

I can provide extra commentary for you to take with you on the day - this can then be used to walk the Judge through the non-compliance.

Yes please, this would be a massive help.

I am so out of my depth right now, I need to understand exactly how it is non-compliant myself.

It is only the POFA legislation in my witness statement, I also talk about how they rely on ANPR timings if there is anything to back that up?

Any help is so appreciated right now. I cant thank this forum enough.

5
OK, I have sent this to them and the court.

So now I'm going to court?

What do I need to do?

6
ChatGPT has helped me with this, should i also include how they did not submit their witness statement or pay the fee by the deadline?

1. Introduction

I am the registered keeper of the vehicle with registration number XXX.
I make this statement from my own knowledge and belief in response to the Claimant’s claim.


2. I was not the driver

I was not the driver of the vehicle on 25 February 2024, the date of the alleged parking event.
At that time, the vehicle was being used by my former partner.


3. Domestic abuse circumstances

My former partner was subsequently removed from my home by the police following a domestic abuse situation.
As a result of this, I no longer have contact with him and I am unable to obtain a statement or any evidence from him.
I respectfully ask the court to take into account that this is the reason I cannot provide further details from the driver.


4. Awareness of the Parking Charge

I did not have proper knowledge or control over correspondence relating to this matter at the time it was being sent.
I became aware of the Parking Charge Notice and related correspondence only after my former partner had been removed from the property.
Upon becoming aware, I acted promptly and sought advice, and I have engaged with the process in good faith.


5. The Claimant has not proven I was the driver

The Claimant has provided no evidence that I was the driver of the vehicle.
Their case relies on an assumption that I, as the registered keeper, am liable.
I deny that I was the driver and there is no evidence before the court to contradict my statement.


6. Failure to establish keeper liability under POFA


As the Claimant cannot establish that I was the driver, they must rely on Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (“POFA”) to hold me liable as keeper.


POFA requires strict compliance with specific statutory conditions in order to transfer liability from the driver to the keeper.


The Claimant has not demonstrated such compliance. In particular:



(a) The Claimant has not provided a clear explanation or evidence of how each requirement under Schedule 4 has been satisfied.
(b) The Claimant relies on a generic assertion of keeper liability rather than strict proof.
(c) The Notice to Keeper relies on ANPR entry and exit times rather than properly identifying a clear “period of parking” as required by POFA.
(d) The Claimant’s witness statement does not address POFA compliance in any structured or legally sufficient way.


In the absence of strict compliance with POFA, liability cannot be transferred to me as the registered keeper.


7. ANPR evidence does not prove a breach

The Claimant relies on ANPR timestamps to allege a parking duration.
These timestamps only show entry and exit from the site and do not establish:


The actual period the vehicle was parked,
Whether the driver had time to read terms and conditions,
Whether a contract was properly formed.


I submit that this evidence is insufficient to establish a breach of contract.


8. Claimant’s absence

The Claimant has confirmed that it will not attend the hearing and has asked the Court to decide the matter in its absence. [Trial Bundle (1) | PDF]
As a result, the Claimant is not present to:


Challenge my evidence,
Clarify deficiencies in its case,
Provide further proof of compliance with POFA.


I respectfully submit that this undermines the Claimant’s ability to discharge the burden of proof.


9. Additional costs are not recoverable

The Claimant has added £70 in additional “contractual costs” to the original parking charge. [Trial Bundle (1) | PDF]
I submit that these additional costs are not recoverable, represent an inflated claim, and are inconsistent with established case law principles.


10. Conclusion

I was not the driver of the vehicle.
The Claimant has failed to prove that I was the driver.
The Claimant has failed to demonstrate strict compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and therefore cannot hold me liable as keeper.
The Claimant has chosen not to attend the hearing and cannot address the clear deficiencies in its case.


11. Request to the Court

In light of the above, I respectfully request that the Court dismisses the claim.


Statement of Truth
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.
Signed: ___________________________

7
Oh I was wrong.

The email they sent said "The Claimant is willing to accept the sum of £135.00 in full and final settlement of the claim, provided that payment is received by 4pm 17th June 2026. This offer is made on the basis that, upon cleared receipt of the settlement sum, the Claimant will take steps to vacate the hearing, with no further order as to costs save as agreed"

Where do I start?

Who do I complain to that they did not submit the witness statement?

And what do I write because theirs is all about another case.

8
Today is the last day I have to pay the money and make it all go away.

I cant afford a CCJ

10
oh, I have clicked the link and it is fuzzy.

it's a 60 page pdf, can I upload that anywhere or shall I just copy and paste the text?

12
I have not heard back from the court about the status of the case but recieved a witness statement/trial bundle from the claiment yesterday.

https://ibb.co/Qv6KR8Pp


13
I spoke to them, they said no fee has been paid and no documents have been submitted, but it may be that the court hasn’t updated it? I should check again at the end of next week?

14
4pm when I leave

Website says they are open until 5

Pages: [1] 2