Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - kragnar

Pages: [1] 2
1
Yes, if there is a legitimate basis to challenge the PCN and a reasonable prospect of success, I would be prepared to take it to London Tribunals.

Naturally, nobody wants to pay a penalty they feel has been unfairly issued or disproportionate to the circumstances.

2
@Incandescent: They do not appear to accept that I was legitimately picking up a passenger as a private hire driver as sufficient grounds to cancel the PCN.

I have come across previous cases on this forum where private hire drivers received tickets for picking up passengers on the same road, and those appeals were consistently rejected. Based on this, it seems unlikely that the PCN will be cancelled on that basis alone.

Thank you for the advice. I will include it if I am unable to identify a stronger ground for challenging the PCN when I submit the appeal.

3
@Incandescent: Sorry, I thought I had uploaded everything. My mistake. after your comment, I noticed that I hadn't added the "Except for access" signs JPEG. I have since corrected this and have now added it to the rest of the images.


@Hippocrates: Can you expand on what you mean? 

"They cannot serve a charge certificate 28 days from the date of the notice." are you advising me to use that as a defence for the appeal and beyond or is that just a statement?

Please have patience with me as I don't want to misunderstand anything and as such will ask questions on anything that I don't understand.

Much appreciated.

4
Hi all,

I’m looking for some advice regarding a PCN I’ve received for driving through the Rye Lane / Hanover Park junction.

I was working at the time and relying on Uber navigation, which in hindsight was not suitable for this area. As I approached the junction at around 20mph, I did see a sign but misinterpreted it in the moment. I believed it indicated a time-based restriction (such as no entry during certain hours), and since it was exactly 10pm, I assumed I was outside the restricted period and proceeded.

I accept that this was my mistake; however, the conditions made it more difficult to properly interpret the signage. It was dark at the time, and although the sign is illuminated, it was not immediately clear enough to process correctly while driving. I have attached a JPEG of the first sign I saw.

Upon reviewing the location afterwards on Google Maps, I noticed there is an additional sign near the bus stop stating “No left turn for motor vehicles except for access,” which I did not see on the night. I am unsure whether the “except for access” element is relevant in my case, as I was entering the road specifically to pick up a passenger.

Regarding the final sign positioned near the traffic lights, I did notice it, but due to its placement and angle, I was unable to properly register its meaning in time to safely stop or change direction. By the time it became apparent, I had effectively committed to the route, and there was no clear opportunity to exit or turn around once at the traffic lights.


After entering and reaching the pickup point, I immediately felt something was off — there were no regular vehicles around, only buses, and the layout felt unusual given how I had just come out of normal traffic. I hesitated but assumed I had misunderstood the situation and waited for the passenger.

Shortly after, a passer-by kindly approached me and warned that it was a bus-only route and that I would likely receive a ticket.

Since then, I’ve done some research and found that a significant number of drivers seem to have been caught out at this exact location, many of whom have shared similar experiences here and elsewhere. It appears to be a recurring issue rather than an isolated mistake. I have browsed this forum and found instances of others asking for help for the same location. So far from what i have found on the forum, the cancel only cancelled it once.

From what I’ve seen so far:

* Most people end up paying the PCN
* Some have taken it to the London Tribunal
* I’ve only come across a couple of cases where the council cancelled the ticket


What I’m struggling to understand is whether there is any consistent or successful argument for appeal in cases like this — particularly where:

* The signage may be misread in real-time driving conditions
* Navigation apps route drivers directly into the restriction
* There is a clear pattern of repeated confusion among drivers

I fully accept I drove through the restriction, but I’m trying to determine whether it’s worth appealing based on signage clarity and the volume of similar cases.

Has anyone here successfully challenged a PCN at this specific junction, or does anyone have insight into whether it’s realistically worth taking this further?

Appreciate any guidance.

Photos and Video: https://imgpile.com/p/H4WF9mi

Google Maps: https://maps.app.goo.gl/hzxszKcbLjFGu58A8

Note: On the google maps, please make sure to set the date as the latest 2022 as before then sign is not there. It is the road turning left toward Baba LTD and toward KFC.

5
You bring up a good point. I haven’t been able to find any signage or road markings that clearly indicate where the 440-yard limit ends.

As mentioned above, that makes it difficult for a driver to know with any certainty where a U-turn would be permitted. In practice, the only options are to estimate the distance or to avoid turning altogether until well beyond what you reasonably believe to be the restricted area.

The appeal deadline is approaching, so I plan to submit a challenge on that basis—namely, that the restriction isn’t clearly defined or adequately communicated to motorists.

I’ll update the thread once I receive a response. That said, I’m not especially optimistic given how these cases are often handled by councils. I may consider taking it to adjudication, although I’m still weighing up whether this point alone is strong enough to justify going that far.

7
Hi,

I’ve received a PCN from Waltham Forest for an alleged prohibited U-turn, and I’m trying to figure out the best way to approach it.

The notice includes video evidence on their appeal site. What’s confusing is that this is a road with multiple recorded usage on previous occasions without any issues, so this has come as a bit of a surprise. I’m not sure if the restriction is something that’s been introduced recently or if it’s been there for a while but just isn’t very noticeable.

I’ve since gone back to the location and can see that there is a sign in place, although it wasn’t something I noticed at the time.

I haven’t submitted an appeal yet, as I wanted to get some advice first before taking any steps.

Would appreciate any guidance on whether this is worth challenging, if there are any valid grounds to appeal, or if there’s anything else I should consider before responding.

I have access to all the evidence on the council’s site, including the video, and can share it if that helps.

Thanks in advance.

GSV: https://maps.app.goo.gl/YyQR1pMxHNrW5iCy9

https://imgpile.com/p/oLnWOGk

8
Hi all,

Just a quick update and huge thanks to everyone here for the guidance — especially around Horizon’s failure to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4.

I used the appeal format discussed in my earlier post, clearly stating I was the hirer (not the driver), and pointed out their non-compliance. I also attached receipts from the day of the incident, while making it clear that these did not identify the driver — and that I had no intention of doing so.

Horizon has now responded and cancelled the charge as a “gesture of goodwill”. Here’s what they said:

"Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding the above Parking Charge, which we have reviewed.

I can confirm as a gesture of goodwill the Parking Charge has now been cancelled and no further action will be taken in this matter.

Please note that further Parking Charges may not be cancelled."

Whether it was goodwill or just them avoiding a losing battle, I’ll take it — and I wouldn't have got there without this forum.

Thanks again!

Consider this case closed.

9
Hi all,

Thanks again for the guidance so far — especially around Horizon's non-compliance with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4.

Based on what you've told me, I've drafted the following appeal to send to Horizon Parking as the hirer (not the driver). I haven’t submitted it yet and would appreciate any final feedback before I do.

Draft Appeal to Horizon Parking:

Subject: Appeal against PCN – Notice to Hirer – [PCN Number]

Dear Horizon Parking,

I am the hirer of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and will be making a formal complaint about this predatory and unfair charge to your client (the landowner).

Your Notice to Hirer fails to comply with the strict requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA). Specifically, it was not accompanied by:

A copy of the Notice to Keeper

A copy of the hire agreement

A statement of liability signed by the hirer

Partial or substantial compliance is not sufficient. Because these documents were not included, you have no right under PoFA 2012 to transfer liability to the hirer.

There will be no admission as to the identity of the driver, and no assumptions or inferences can be made. You may not pursue the hirer under contract law without the proper legal basis to do so.

Your Notice to Hirer can only hold the driver liable, and I will not be naming them. If you believe otherwise, I suggest you test your position at POPLA, where I will be making a strong submission based on your non-compliance.

You are urged to cancel this Parking Charge Notice now and avoid wasting further time.



Questions for the forum:

Does the above appeal look good to send to Horizon? Anything you'd change or add?

I’m also considering contacting Rontec, who operate the petrol station where this happened. I’ve had success in the past with a restaurant PCN — I contacted them directly and they cancelled it without needing proof.

In this case, I plan to attach the PCN and a redacted bank statement showing purchases made on the same day, and submit it through Rontec’s website as a complaint.

Would you recommend going ahead with that? I’ve already drafted a professional and polite message for Rontec and can post it here if helpful.

Thanks again for your help — I really appreciate the time and advice.

10
Thanks again for the guidance — I’ve now read through the forum guide you linked and understand the importance of not revealing who was driving.

To clarify my earlier post: while I may have used “I” a lot when describing the events, I haven’t made any formal contact with Horizon or anyone else in writing. I haven’t identified the driver at any stage.

All that has happened so far is:

I received the Notice to Hirer today (04/09/2025).

On my way to a job earlier today, I briefly stopped by the petrol station to try and find a contact email or number for the site operator to potentially raise a complaint.

I only asked the person there about who to contact regarding a PCN and didn’t give any details or discuss the incident.

I haven’t submitted any appeals or correspondence to Horizon at all.

In response to your other question — nothing else came with the Notice to Hirer. It was just the single-page letter titled Parking Charge Notice to Hirer (which I've already attached in the thread). There were:

No copy of the Notice to Keeper

No copy of the hire agreement

No copy of a statement of liability signed by me (the hirer)

11
Hi all,

I've received a Notice to Hirer PCN from Horizon Parking, and I would really appreciate some help and advice before I take further action.

Background:

The alleged contravention took place at a petrol station that I use regularly. I'm an Uber driver, and due to my airport runs, I often stop at this location multiple times a day as it's ideally situated for:

Filling up on fuel

Topping up tire pressure

Using the personal vacuums provided

Occasionally buying items from the shop inside

I do not use the location for general parking, as I'm aware of the 20-minute time limit, and have always been careful to stick to that.

On the day in question:

I used multiple services offered at the petrol station.

I have bank statement evidence showing purchases made on the day, which support that I was a paying customer. Note: The bank statement date appears as 5th August, but this refers to purchases made on the 4th. I will attach a full view of the transaction which, when clicked on, shows the correct transaction date (4th August).

I suspect I may have returned to the site more than once in a short timeframe, which could be why this PCN was issued.

The signage with the T&Cs is not easily visible, though I will admit I am familiar with the time restriction from past visits and do try to follow it carefully.

This is the first time I've had any issue at this location, despite frequent visits. I’m currently planning to raise a formal complaint with the petrol station operators, as I believe this charge is unfair – especially given that I was actively using their paid services and not misusing their parking area as i have done in a similar case before and it worked .

However, before I proceed, I thought it best to seek advice from this forum first, in case there are steps I should be taking now regarding Horizon Parking or any templates that might apply (e.g. BVRLA guidance, hire car rules, POFA compliance, etc.).

I have attached:

Photos/scans of the PCN

Photos of the terms and conditions/signage from the location

Relevant info from my bank statement (with sensitive details redacted)

Any advice on how to proceed with appealing this or getting it cancelled would be massively appreciated. I’d also be grateful if anyone could confirm whether the PCN is compliant and enforceable, especially given it’s a Notice to Hirer.

Thanks in advance for your time and help!

location: https://maps.app.goo.gl/gnPVDj9C2kBkZ1Ey7
Images: https://imgur.com/a/VGJKsNb

12
Just wanted to give a quick update and say thank you to everyone who offered help and guidance regarding the PCN for O/S 2 YORK WAY N1 – Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway) from TfL.

After weighing everything up, I’ve decided to just pay the charge today as it’s the final day before the 50% discount expires. I genuinely appreciate all the support and the time people took to share their knowledge and advice — it really does mean a lot, especially as it's done out of pure goodwill. Blessings to you all for that.

This PCN is now closed and dealt with.

THANK YOU.

13
Please advice. This is the Final appeal letter i crafted based on what has been discussed so far.

Dear NCP,

I am writing to formally challenge the above-referenced Parking Charge Notice.

I am the hirer of the vehicle at the time of the alleged contravention. Please note that I am not identifying the driver, and there is no evidence in your correspondence that establishes who the driver was.

Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4), a private parking operator may only hold a vehicle’s registered keeper or hirer liable for a parking charge if specific statutory conditions are met. One such condition is that the land in question must be “relevant land”. Gatwick Airport is subject to statutory control under airport byelaws, which makes it not “relevant land” as defined under PoFA.

This means NCP cannot rely on PoFA to transfer liability for the parking charge to either the keeper or the hirer. Only the driver could be held liable, and since the identity of the driver has not been provided, there is no lawful basis for pursuing this charge.

If Gatwick Airport wished to pursue liability under its byelaws, that would be a matter for the landowner, not NCP. Your charge is a civil contractual claim issued for your company’s own commercial interest, and it does not meet the requirements of a statutory penalty issued under byelaws.

Furthermore, you cannot infer or presume that the hirer was the driver, nor rely on any “agency” theory to bypass PoFA, which is the only legal route available for transferring liability under such circumstances.

Given these points, I respectfully request that you cancel this PCN. Should you choose not to cancel it, please issue a formal rejection notice along with a POPLA code so I may refer the matter for independent adjudication.

14
OP, let's sort out who's who first pl.

You are not the registered keeper; you do not have a PCN in your own name; whether to appeal to the tribunal is not your decision although you may act for the keeper with their consent.

If the keeper lost at appeal would they charge you a fee for processing payment of the penalty?

TfL say you were stopped for 4 minutes, you say you had your brake lights on all the time which proves it was more momentary. The CCTV will show, I suspect TfL are correct. You then drove off without anyone boarding and you don't have any job sheet or similar record for the day.

Barring there being procedural grounds to make an appeal worthwhile then why risk the discount?

We really need to know who's who.

Thanks for the reply — let me clarify the situation:

I'm not the registered keeper of the vehicle, but I hire it directly from the company that owns it — no third party involved. I was also the driver on the night in question.

If I do decide to challenge it at tribunal, there won’t be any extra charges from the company that owns the vehicle — they’re not involved beyond the hire. So the only risk on my end would be losing the discount and having to pay the full PCN amount. I’ve never taken a case this far before, so I’m not fully sure what costs or steps might come with the tribunal process.

Normally, if I make a mistake or stop somewhere I shouldn't, I take the hit, pay the PCN, and treat it as a lesson. I don’t usually challenge things unless I genuinely believe there’s some justification — and in this case, I was genuinely there to pick up a passenger.

Unfortunately, if the PCN had arrived even a few days earlier, I might’ve been able to retrieve the relevant job record or cancellation proof. But by the time it came through, that data was gone. So at this point, there’s no point dwelling on what I could’ve done.

I’m seriously considering just paying the discounted rate now — unless there’s a clear procedural ground to challenge it. I'm aware that appealing and then losing means paying full price, and with limited evidence and no guarantee, it may not be worth the time and stress.

You can treat this as more of a last attempt to check if there’s any solid ground to go on. If I’d known about this forum earlier, I would’ve started here — but it is what it is.

Thanks again to everyone who's taken the time to help.

Please Advice.

15
So, looking at the GSV view and also reading your narrative, it is clear you stopped and were stationary for 5 minutes on the double-red lines in the street alongside Kings Cross Station.

This is what Transport for London say about Taxis and Private Hire vehicles on their website: -

Quote
Taxi & private hire
Always display your licence and exemption sticker. Private hire vehicle owners will now be offered red route exemption stickers at the point of inspection. We will not, under any circumstances, issue a red route sign to an individual whose vehicle is not on site for a licensing inspection.

You can pick up and drop off passengers on most red routes as long as you display your private hire vehicle (PHV) license. It will tell police, CCTV operators and other road users that you're allowed to do this. It also means that you'll avoid receiving a penalty charge.

You can't stop on the parts of the red route with a wide red line, pedestrian crossings or zigzags.

So provided you display your PHV licence you should be exempt, and any PCN served incorrectly should be cancelled by TfL. However, you have not posted up the other information we need to see, like your PCN, and the correspondence between you and TfL, so please do so.

The problem is that I see no PHV licence visible on your vehicle, so that seems to be the problem. I assume it's a yellow plate with your licence details on it. However, maybe London is different. Here in Crewe ply-for-hire cabs have white plates, and privated hire cars yellow ones. They are always mounted as near the rear number plate as possible.

Thanks for your reply and for taking the time to look into this — I really appreciate the help from everyone so far.

Regarding the PHV licence display: in London, TfL issues private hire vehicle licence badges in the form of two small circular stickers. These are attached from the inside of the vehicle — one on the top left corner of the front windscreen and the other in the same position on the rear window. Unlike some other councils where large external plates are used, TfL’s method makes the badges harder to spot unless you're viewing the vehicle from quite close up, especially at night or from certain angles. In most cases, the front badge is the most likely one to be picked up by a camera, but even then, visibility can vary.

That could very well be why the licence wasn't clearly visible in this case — even though it was there. I’ve always kept it in place as required.

As for the correspondence with TfL and the actual PCN, I’ll upload those shortly for context. I’m just going through and gathering everything properly before posting.

Again, thank you to everyone who's responded — your help has been genuinely appreciated.

One other thing, If i do try to take the appeal further as TFL has Suggested, on what statutory grounds could i even appeal under and what are the chances of me winning the appeal.

Pages: [1] 2