Show Posts - ghostivv

No and both were called soon after. He was asked to read skeleton argument and judge dismissed the claim.Dont have anymore details at the moment but the skeleton was a patched up version from one of the thread here. Will update once have more details.I was not very helpful as defence was based on Entrance sign and PoC defects.

Appointment was for 10:00 today but looks like court is too busy as they're saying it'll be at least 15:00 for hearing. Other party is also present and both agreed to walk out for another day's hearing. Too much hassle and not worth the time effort.

update: Received letter from court revoking order of recovery and order to cancel Charge certificate.

attached WS. Need to send it before today's closing time. Pls have a look and advice on what needs to be removed or add. Also if unable to attend court, how to correctly word. Witness Statement

Hi allMy family member is the registered keeper. The NtK was received on 7th Oct 2024 and I advised him to search here for guidance. The defence was submitted on 14th July 2025. I looked into the defence and it was standard POC CPR replies found here. Received Witness Statement on 20th Feb and hearing is on 13th March. Initially the hearing was in Bromley court but received another notice of trial date dated 16th Jan 2026 from Bromley court to be held in Wandsworth. Anyway looking for advice on how best to word defence witness statement. One strange thing is claimant claiming that defendant's defence has not been received. I'll post WS and other related later as ImgBB is not working atm and also can't seem to find the option to attach files directly.Not sure if drive links will work here but anyway whole folder : Drive Folder

Received reply from Martson when requested for the "current legislation" in regard to delivery of Notice of Enforcement. Their reply: QuoteIn line with the Interpretation Act 1978 regarding notice, we are required to post the letter, and this is sufficient for us to presume that notice has been given. For us to consider that notice hasn’t been received, you would need to provide evidence in support of this.The act : Quote7 References to service by post.Where an Act authorises or requires any document to be served by post (whether the expression “serve” or the expression “give” or “send” or any other expression is used) then, unless the contrary intention appears, the service is deemed to be effected by properly addressing, pre-paying and posting a letter containing the document and, unless the contrary is proved, to have been effected at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post.Anyone care to explain in simple words? I still believe the Enforcement firm (and agents) were in breach of laws even if they're relying on above act. Also what kind of evidence to provide? Address proof, V5C showing the correct address? 

sorry for confusion. Quoted part is the response from Martson Holdings, the enforcement firm.

update: Received reply from TEC that the forms PE2/P3sent were wrong and to reapply with TE7/TE9. PE2 and PE3 were filled by baillifadvieonline. No reply from them when informed that they have provided wrong form. They were highly referred in this forum but our experience been opposite. Late to reply and took almost 7 days to send wrong forms. Correct TE7 and TE9 sent on 02/12/2025. Response received from council on the complaint made. They have asked to forward supporting documents (dealership letter explaining wrong address during purchase and registering of V5C) to parking manager (email provided) for further review. Also received response from Martson about the complaint that their enforcement agents in breach of The Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 without giving proper notice and time. Their response : QuoteI have carefully reviewed the information you provided and completed a full investigation. Your complaint concerns you did not receive any correspondence prior to an enforcement agent clamping your vehicle.We sent the Notice of Enforcement letter to you in good faith. We are only required to ensure that the letter is sent and not take further steps to make sure that it is received. This is in line with current legislation.is this correct?

edit

Fee of £560 paid to release the clamp after advice from bailiffadviceonline.FOI request to have details of PCN and related documents sent to Waltham Forest. Request to have copy of Notice of Enforcement and N125 Certificate of service also sent to Martson. Contacted car dealer and requested in writing explaining error made on V5C which they've said they'll look into. Only information currently known are PCN number, Martson recovery fee and reference number and confirmation on live chat that the Notice of Enforcement was sent on 30th Oct 2025 to address 45 XXXXX Road (correct address : 45B XXXXX Road). Apart from Martson receipt of payment, there are no other related documents. What happens to legal documents if there is no address to deliver eg door no doesn't exist? Returns back to original sender? Is there anyway to find the court address where this NoE was issued? It's an unfortunate situation but that the Baillifs pounced on the fact that NoE was not served on correct address, no time to response against such notice and took advantage of it.

HiSorry for confusion. I'm helping a friend. As I'm registered here, it'll be easier to pass on the advice given here.

OK I think what's the problem here is. The door number is 45B. There are others with door number A-D. The Notice of Enforcement was issued to 45 (without suffix) and never delivered to any address.

Problem is they don't have any paperworks which were never received. Not even Notice of Enforcement was served to current address. The bailiffs visit was a total surprise and at first thought it was a scam as only thing they were showing was a screenshot of PCN details on their phone. Reading through some other posts in here, Notice of Enforcement should have been posted to current address before visit?Edit: Thanks will advice to pay up the fine if bailiff turns up today. what kind of evidence or paperworks we can request to have? eg name & company of bailiff, individual name, receipt of payment, warrant etc.Edit2: Car has been clamped.

Need an advice on how best to proceed. Bailiff came around today demanding payment. This is the first time the owner of the car was aware of outstanding PCN and the court order. Only evidence they produced was the footage of the car (bus lane) and screenshot of the PCN from the website https://walthamocm.itsvc.co.uk/ which is recorded as "warrrant issued". When checking on Waltham Forest https://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/parking-roads-and-travel/parking-fines-and-removals/pay-parking-penalty-charge-notice-pcn page there's no record of PCN. Looks like this is what happended. The dealer filled in V5C but few weeks later they called in to say that they've made mistake on the address and reapplied the V5C. The V5C was received almost 6 weeks after the purchase of the car. The contravention probably occured before the amended V5C and the PCN related documents plus court paperworks were likely sent to address that the dealer filled in.  Will appreciate any advice before bailiff turns up tomorrow. Thanks.Timeline: V5C: Date of first Registration : 27/05/2025Issue date: 17/07/2025PCN: council : Waltham ForestContravention Date: 14/06/2025Location: Lea Bridge RoadCode: 47

Hi, sorry for late reply as was trying to find the answers on this as they were away on holidays. The fine of £40 was paid after receiving the rejection letter. regards,