1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Waltham Forest. Code 11 u, Parked without payment of Parking Charge (electronic payment) Frances Road Chingford E4
« on: May 14, 2025, 03:56:19 pm »
"You parked, apparently you didn't check (well enough*)...there's only one sign which applies. As you know, what's on the other side of the road might as well be on the moon because it has no relevance. At present your draft looks like you've trawled previous threads and cobbled together a mix of headings, however irrelevant! Either you looked for it before you left the car or you didn't.
*- look at the CEO's photos. One photo of the sign which doesn't show the restriction clearly but does imply that reading the sign safely is difficult because even the CEO's best effort yielded a practicably unreadable sign.
So perhaps you could mix recent change with 'legitimate expectation'/a casual look at what to all intents and purposes looks like the same sign as before(NB you were parked at an unrestricted time under the previous restriction) and how the CEO's photo shows how difficult reading the sign safely(while on the pavement) was.
There was a van in the way, I don't have x ray vision
No I didn't know there was a difference between the two signs on each side of the road!
My draft was created before I logged onto this site, so your assumptions are wrong! I didn't look for the sign as I couldn't see it. Do you need that repeated again?
I haven't seen the CEO photos, and don't know how to access them. Perhaps, one of you could guide me to where I can find it?
Given the belittling and patronising comments made, I may as well just pay the fee, and save myself from being used to flex your superior knowledge.
If I knew what was required, I wouldn't need your assistance. I came to seek assistance and got patronised.
If there is anyone here who can assist me with my appeal, I would be grateful, otherwise, I'll pay up, and avoid using this forum again.
*- look at the CEO's photos. One photo of the sign which doesn't show the restriction clearly but does imply that reading the sign safely is difficult because even the CEO's best effort yielded a practicably unreadable sign.
So perhaps you could mix recent change with 'legitimate expectation'/a casual look at what to all intents and purposes looks like the same sign as before(NB you were parked at an unrestricted time under the previous restriction) and how the CEO's photo shows how difficult reading the sign safely(while on the pavement) was.
There was a van in the way, I don't have x ray vision
No I didn't know there was a difference between the two signs on each side of the road!
My draft was created before I logged onto this site, so your assumptions are wrong! I didn't look for the sign as I couldn't see it. Do you need that repeated again?
I haven't seen the CEO photos, and don't know how to access them. Perhaps, one of you could guide me to where I can find it?
Given the belittling and patronising comments made, I may as well just pay the fee, and save myself from being used to flex your superior knowledge.
If I knew what was required, I wouldn't need your assistance. I came to seek assistance and got patronised.
If there is anyone here who can assist me with my appeal, I would be grateful, otherwise, I'll pay up, and avoid using this forum again.