@cp8759
It looks as though some wires have been crossed here. This is probably due to the administrative error by TfL which resulted in the mistaken linking of two separate PCN's (XJxxxx6224 and XJxxxx7557).
As advised, one of those two (7557) has now been cancelled as a result of that administrative error.
By the way, what on Earth happened to the original notice of rejection? You must have received it if you've appealed to the tribunal?
I posted the notice of rejection on this thread some time ago (see below) but I realise that by completely redacting the PCN numbers on that notice I may have added to the confusion. This notice of rejection quoted the numbers of both PCN's in the heading. I subsequently received a letter advising me that one of them (the un-appealed one) had been cancelled and this is also stated in the Case Summary that Tfl have provided. I think I may have got my wires crossed regarding the letter that they sent informing me of the fact that they had cancelled that PCN; that was what I thought you wanted to see and that is what I requested a copy of, and that is what I posted up here a few days ago when I received it.
They are still contesting the appealed PCN at the hearing on Wednesday - here is the post containing the link to the notice of rejection:
Letter of rejection here:
https://imgur.com/a/Fuo6QH0
My initial thoughts are (as per P2 para 2) how would it be possible for me to "make (myself) aware of any charges, tolls or other restrictions that may be in existence along along (my) route" if, as I have already informed them, I had got lost and didn't know where I was?
I apologise for any confusion that my redactions may have caused
Do you want me to request that the hearing be rescheduled?