Free Traffic Legal Advice

Ok.Thank you very much for your response. I shall wait for a letter of claim and send them what I sent originally

Thank you

am I? ih sorry

Apologies for the late response(just bereavement in the family)

Thank you very much for this. I thought I would have to use it but, you will be pleased to know that the owner of the petrol station has now cancelled the charge. I wrote to SGN Texaco, requesting a copy of their contract with Euro Car Parks. They followed up with a phone call and an email, to inform me.
The court letter from HM court & Tribunals service suggested that ECP would have to  participate in ADR or inform the court if they wish to proceed to trial. I guess that is not happening now.


Once again Thank you very much

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

I had a similiar problem with both these debt collectors and from my reading you have a valid claim. Please read the BPA terms and CONDITIONS FOR SUCH members. Also there is the Gov.UK code of practice February 2022  which states that these can be mitigating circumstances

These two companies never like to listen. ECP uses ANRP so they just go by the times not the circumstances. I have just managed to set aside their case agains t me as wrongful.
you should check out Martin Lewish website for further advic
e

OK  thanks very much

Sorry. 30/12/24 Case progression team CNBC do not recognise the claim number


CaseProgression.CNBC <CaseProgression.CNBC@justice.gov.uk>
13:00 (7 hours ago)
to me

Hi

 

Thank you for your enquiry.

 

L44KF1X8W

 

 

I am sorry, the case number you have provided is not recognised on our system.

 

Please check the case number and resend your request.

 

 

 

 

If you require any further information please email us or contact our helpdesk.

 

 

Regards

Silvia McCool

Correspondence Team

Address:
Civil National Business Centre (CNBC)
St Katharine’s House
21 – 27 St Katharine’s Street
Northampton
NN1 2LH

Hello wonder if you can help
I have been taken to court by Euro car parks for allegedly parking on a petrol forecourt over the time limit of 15 mins
The Notice refers to a maximum parking of 15 minutes
However my argument is that
1. I was not parked but merely using a service provided that lasted an hour. It is an outdoor laundry. So how do you put a limit that is shorter than the service provided. I couldn't leave my laundry for reasons of liability. I did what any reasonable user would do which is to wait and operate the laundry as it goes through its process
The sign does not mention STOPPAGE whether there was a limit on how long one can stop for a service
2. the petrol station itself does not have a car park.
I believe this is not a case of parking
They referred the case to DCBLegal who have used their court system to push through a default judgement despite me entering a defence within time. All parties have refused to acknowledge that this is not a parking situation  as described at 5.1.3 of the parking on private land document Gov.UK in force at the material time

2. I believe that DCBL used their own court system to push through this case bypassing any submissions from myself

I responded to euro car parks back in 2021 I stated my case that thia is not a parking issue
6/11.24 submitted mydefence to DCBL. They responded that they couldn't find the case.
18/12/24 emailed the business court with my defence and photo evidence of the petrol station and launderette
They responded that they do not recognise the case number 

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]