Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - msquared

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
How do I prove the predisposition? It'd be my word vs the solicitor and the judge, right? Unless the hearing is recorded?

I appreciate the recommendation but i doubt the legal services will be free, i do not want to fall into a legal fight that will cost me more than time.

I've never been remotely involved with anything like this before, it's unfortunately made it clear that judgements are not always fair, despite the evidence.

2
The judge said he knew the car park well, early on. Which i thought was odd, as he was agreeing with the solicitor who said the same (both clearly Leicester locals). I think this predisposition put me at an unfair advantage as he basically disregarded all of my points in the WS, he kept reiterating the signage was clear etc.


3
Leicester county court. I don't recall the judges name, he was rather young for a judge, truth be told. I should be able to get his name if I do a little digging.

4
My WS was heard and considered but like i said, I could tell from the moment I walked in, the judges mind was made up. He didn't want to set a precedence.

Appreciate all your help.

5
I've got out of the hearing. The judge ruled in their favour effectively arguing that I entered into a contract when I parked there and bought a ticket. His mind was made before I got into room, i was in the room with their solicitor too.

He didn't acknowledge really any of my arguments, specifically the land registry argument, he said "it doesn't help my case" in fact. The signage argument was dismissed, he simply argued that i entered into a contract and therefore I'm liable.

I tried.

6
Perfect, thank you.

7
I have a couple of points I'd like clarified please.

Point 12 in the WS references lease holders that are not referenced in the document I got from the land registry, where was this information gleamed from?

Point 22 in the WS doesn't reference the actual version, it looks like a keyboard short cut for a smiley face emoji accidentally got inserted, can you confirm the version number please? (Sorry, I didn't notice this in my rush to get this WS submitted).

8
Thanks for this. It has been submitted.

What happens next, I expect I need to attend the hearing? What usually happens? - I've never been engaged with anything remotely related to what I'm going through right now.

10
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gghsqjmAqygxS3_g4b51cuJKVJCOh7yb/view?usp=drive_link

This is all 74 pages, i hope its all legible. Unfortunately I do not have a printer or scanner, otherwise it'd have been easier to share the document!

11
OK thanks. I will aim to get you the rest of the document later tonight.

12
Found it, it was under a different post code but it's definitely the right place; https://imgur.com/a/A1FFgIn

13
Doing just that. 3 addresses show for that post code; 1, 1A and 3 Nelson Street, so trying to work out which to review.

14
It does - i won't be able to get you that part of the WS until later tonight, as I'm currently  butI will however.

The appeal i made back in 2022 was an email, simply stating i was slightly late getting back to my car and that the fine was ridiculous.

15
Do you need the full 72 page document?

I've uploaded the first 14 pages which seemed the most pertinent in my previous post, the rest of the document seems to be either contract or the previous cases they cite.

Pages: [1] 2 3