Free Traffic Legal Advice

I was watching the above this morning when a discussion between the host and a representative of the BPA came to the forefront.
BPA were really concerned that if they were to have Debt Collectors fees removed from the process this would increase the pressure on the courts and the use of Debt Collectors was beneficial to those who had received Parking charge notices.
Those motorists could have a payment plan to assist them What kind people they are.

They also felt that £100 should not be capped as inflation affects their business model. Also they felt that motorists would be prepared to pay this amount in lieu of paying parking charges.

They felt that by raising the £100 fee that this would add to road safety as cars parking irresponsibly on roads would use car parks.This would prevent cars blocking the Ambulances, Fire engines etc attending emergencies.

Also they were open to the consideration of mitigating circumstances. If they are going to be judge and jury they could possible move the goalposts no doubt.

What a joker but there was little push back from the interviewer.

Am I missing something but there is mention of POFA requirements so they can not transfer liability to registered keeper. Also as far as I am aware I cannot recall a PCN requesting £70 and not the usual £60 I thought the discount was 60%.

IAS will be a waste of time and effort you will have very little chance of a positive outcome. However if you feel that anything is to be gained for the future the by all means go ahead you place your appeal as outlined and PPC replies this is like tennis match to and fro the onto debt collectors letters and maybe court.

My wife is a member of the LGPS and decided to retire in September this year. Her pension is administered by the Local Government and at the beginning of 2025 made enquiries as to her commuted lump sum and monthly pension.
She was advised as is quite normal to use the LGPS modeller and during the year accessed it at intervals to see what she was entitled to. She also had taken out AVC which could not be taken into consideration as this was with the Prudential.
She was satisfied with the figures stated on the modeller and decided to retire.
She received a telephone call in September after giving her retirement notice stating that there was an error in the figures and that a member of staff had entered the wrong salary for the year 2023/4 cutting a long story short she was informed that the error was £11000 over estimated and that this would be deducted from final commutation. We have complained and been offered without prejudice £500 for distress which was paid into accounts just wondering if we can still escalate to pensions tribunal

Thanks for the advice and appeal sent to NCP.In relation  to the DVLA do I just need to to send the outline of my complaint as suggested above.
Is there a specific address i.e. for KADOE as the options on their complaints page does not seem to fit for the purpose to register complaint.

The location given on the PNC is Cardiff Adam Street.The PCN gives a period of parking as entry 22/11/2025 11.44.09 exit 11.57.25.

As the registered keeper I have received a PCN from NCP. The incident occurred on 22nd November 2025 and the PCN is dated 12th December 2025. Well after 14 days I believe to hold the keeper liable. Apparently the driver entered the car car park at 1144hrs and drove around looking for a car parking space and each time one became available they were unable to do so due to the queue for spaces.
The driver then decided to exit the car park but there was a queue to leave.They left at 1157 hours as per ANPR capture. From my point of view there is no requirement for the registered keeper to nominate the driver due to non compliance with POFA. Please can you provide your views.
I will add the PCN  for viewing but cannot see how to add a photograph at this stage.