Free Traffic Legal Advice

Live cases legal advice => Private parking tickets => Topic started by: mrpopa on February 02, 2026, 12:46:04 pm

Title: Re: groupnexus email response
Post by: jfollows on February 02, 2026, 12:50:00 pm

Your post is unreadable, but it looks like the normal fishing exercise trying to get you to identify the driver.
If so, ignore, and you will get a rejection of your appeal in due course.
Feel free to reply instead, @b789 advises this, but I don’t think it will make a difference. Just do whichever makes you feel happier.

Title: groupnexus email response
Post by: mrpopa on February 02, 2026, 12:46:04 pm

(https://i.ibb.co/Xx3mDffL/Screenshot-2026-02-02-123825.png) (https://ibb.co/xqfVYKKL)

what should i respond

i want to respond with the following:

'''''Dear Sir/Madam,

I refer to your email dated 28/01/2026.

As already stated, I am the registered keeper of the vehicle. I will not be naming the driver.

Your Notice to Keeper does not comply with the mandatory requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and, as such, you have no right to pursue the keeper for this charge. As you are no doubt aware, there is no legal obligation for a keeper to identify the driver.

You are therefore invited to either:

1. Cancel the Parking Charge Notice, or
2. Issue a POPLA verification code so the matter may be referred to independent adjudication.

Any further attempts to pursue the keeper without lawful basis will be considered unreasonable conduct and may be raised in any subsequent complaint or proceedings.

I do not consent to any further processing of my personal data beyond that strictly necessary for the resolution of this matter.

Yours faithfully,
''''

please do let me know if i should change anything