Free Traffic Legal Advice
Live cases legal advice => Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) => Topic started by: NTIAEP on November 27, 2025, 12:17:25 pm
-
What did they say?
-
As expected, Redbridge rejected my reps.....so London Tribunals hearing in the pipeline.
-
I like it.
-
Salutations to all from me.
and "When it rains...it pours!!!" springs to mind.
Have received another PCN, this time for the above-mentioned alleged contravention. Details are:
PCN (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nx65qfyf5kwxdcqkt4u20/20251118_MF17VHY_PCN-AF21017637_Uphall-Lane_20251021.pdf?rlkey=908sl06695uuyio82xrw1f0u8&st=kkpes0ia&dl=0)
CCTV footage (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/b55i44v2mbmhoroskwzyn/AF21017637_video.mp4?rlkey=j4tjswt31luimojovti8fjbwd&st=b7aqd0c7&dl=0)
GSV (https://maps.app.goo.gl/iPuKGbk77d7BDzHDA)
Will be submitting initial reps along the following lines:
1) using @Hippocrates argument of missing mandatory language pertaining to "...Para. 4 (8 ) (v) of...."
2) tree foliage on the nearside along with height of the signs did not give a clear and unrestricted view of the said signs;
3) no advance warning signs with the enforced times, just the following (see pic) (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/173o3am82az9cinxq0eb2/AF21017637_current-advance-warning-signs.jpg?rlkey=k0ln9lmm8hphcjok2z4w6pmw5&st=06qmsusm&dl=0). Is this a valid [regulatory] argument?
Can't use the "Term-time only" get-out clause anymore as most (not all!!) have been taped over.
Thoughts/opinions please before I shoot it off to Redbridge council.
Regards - NTIAEP