Free Traffic Legal Advice

Live cases legal advice => Private parking tickets => Topic started by: Bristolfella on November 20, 2025, 05:47:36 am

Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 24, 2025, 05:34:57 pm
Thanks for your guidance!
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: b789 on November 24, 2025, 03:50:03 pm
Follow that response with the following:

Quote
Subject: Unresolved Formal Complaint – Parking Charge [707348/407430] – VRM [ABC1234]

Dear Sir or Madam,

Thank you for your recent email in which you stated:

“Your request to submit a late appeal has been denied. The evidence you provided did not meet the necessary requirements and we are unable to grant access to the appeals process.”

That response does not address, still less resolve, the formal complaint I raised as registered keeper. To recap:

• I have lived at my current address since 2015.
• I have owned this vehicle since 2019 and my V5C has shown this same correct address throughout.
• I have never received any original Parking Charge Notice, Notice to Keeper or reminder relating to this alleged event on 29 January 2024.

Your “Final Notice” of 13 November 2025 was the first correspondence I have ever seen about this matter.

In those circumstances, I expressly rebut any suggestion that a Notice to Keeper was “given” or delivered to me. Any presumption of delivery is rebuttable and, on these facts, is clearly rebutted.

Your reply:

1. fails to engage with my evidence of non-delivery;
2. fails to provide the posting and addressing records I requested; and
3. attempts to shut down the complaint by asserting that I cannot appeal “because the timeframe has passed”, when the only reason I am out of time is your own failure to serve any Notice to Keeper.

This is not compliant with the Private Parking Single Code of Practice (PPSCoP).

Under Section 11.2, a complaint that questions the validity of a parking charge must be treated as an appeal. You have refused to do so despite knowing that I never received your original notice.

Under Section 8.1.2(e) Note 2, any presumption of delivery is conditional and operators “must retain a record of the date of posting of a notice, not simply of that notice having been generated (e.g. the date that any third-party mail consolidator actually put it in the postal system).”

You have produced no evidence of proper posting or addressing and have ignored my request for:

• the exact name and address used (including any flat/building numbers);
• the date and method of posting; and
• any batch posting records / certificates of posting / mailshot logs.

Unless and until you can produce those records, you cannot establish that any Notice to Keeper was ever “given” in accordance with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, and you have no lawful basis to pursue me as keeper.

For the avoidance of doubt, I am not admitting to being the driver and I am not identifying the driver.

Please now:

1. Confirm that this is being treated and logged as a formal complaint under the PPSCoP;
2. Provide the posting/address evidence requested above; and
3. Confirm that the case is put on hold for at least 30 days while you properly investigate and respond to my complaint.

If you maintain your refusal to address the complaint or to provide the posting records that the PPSCoP requires you to retain, I will escalate this as a formal misuse-of-data complaint to the DVLA and to your Accredited Trade Association, the BPA. I will also rely on your conduct and these letters in any future court proceedings when inviting the court to find that you have behaved unreasonably.

Yours faithfully,

[Name]
[Postal address]
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Nosy Parker on November 24, 2025, 03:01:56 pm
Email it as a subject access request and complaint to the two addresses previously provided
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 24, 2025, 02:58:51 pm
OK So I've submitted the letter, saved as a PDF to both their complaints portal as well as their late appeals portal

Already had a 'denial' of late appeal with no right of reply or reason given  ::)

(https://i.postimg.cc/PJyQbg75/i-Screen-Shoter-Mail-251124145634.jpg)
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Nosy Parker on November 24, 2025, 12:20:26 pm
Agreed
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: DWMB2 on November 24, 2025, 12:08:06 pm
Quote
The V5C and NTK are proof of address not identity. 
Whether or not they should, I've found that most parking companies will respond to a SAR when provided with the V5C and a copy of a utility bill.

If providing a driving licence then as you say, always hide the photo, and licence number at a minimum.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Nosy Parker on November 24, 2025, 11:20:45 am
DO NOT, ever, give your drivers license as proof of identity. At least redact the photo and your signature. All they need for a SAR is a copy of your V5C which shows your name and current address. Even just the NtK is sufficient as it already contains your name and address on it.

This is not a SAR. It is a formal complaint. If you want to request a SAR (never recommended at this stage) then you email that to the DPO email address from their privacy statement.

I disagree.  It is a SAR as well as a formal complaint. The two are not mutually exclusive. The V5C and NTK are proof of address not identity.  There is no harm in providing proof of identity provided it is suitably redacted as I suggested in my previous post.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: b789 on November 24, 2025, 11:14:30 am
DO NOT, ever, give your drivers license as proof of identity. At least redact the photo and your signature. All they need for a SAR is a copy of your V5C which shows your name and current address. Even just the NtK is sufficient as it already contains your name and address on it.

This is not a SAR. It is a formal complaint. If you want to request a SAR (never recommended at this stage) then you email that to the DPO email address from their privacy statement.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Nosy Parker on November 24, 2025, 11:05:41 am
As you are requesting information held by Parkingeye that relates to yourself, you are making a subject access request ('SAR') under data protection legislation.  You should send your SAR to Parkingeye's data protection officer's email address privacy@parkingeye.co.uk and cc it to enforcement@parkingeye.co.uk.  Parkingeye will want to see proof of your identity to show that you are the correct data subject.  It will speed things up if you supply this with your SAR rather than waiting for them to request it. A copy of your driving licence should be sufficient.  I generally redact the licence number and part of the photo to prevent misuse.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 24, 2025, 06:29:39 am
Oh sorry and thank you very much. I wasn’t being deliberately blind, I genuinely didn’t find that on the website, only the appeals page!
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: b789 on November 24, 2025, 05:01:29 am
Come on people… this isn’t rocket science. Just use their online web form to send te complaint. You can just upload the complaint as a pdf and say on the web form “see attached formal complaint letter”.

https://www.parkingeye.co.uk/motorist/complaints/form/
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 23, 2025, 06:06:31 pm
Their own website offers no contact details beyond post.

They do have a WhatsApp chat which I have initiated but can’t see that going anywhere. So I will post the complaint letter. Thank you.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: DWMB2 on November 23, 2025, 05:14:56 pm
Any other alternative email I can try?
See what you can find on Google. Given the suggested communication is a complaint, see what their complaints process says about means through which to contact them with a complaint.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 23, 2025, 05:10:20 pm
Info@parkingeye.co.uk bounced back as undeliverable. Only accepts email from inside their organisation.

Imagine my shock.

Any other alternative email I can try? If not I assume a postal delivery is the only route forwards as long as I obtain a proof of posting to prove that I have responded to their final notice?
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 21, 2025, 05:04:53 pm
Many thanks
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: jfollows on November 21, 2025, 03:06:45 pm
info@parkingeye.co.uk is suggested in several places
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 21, 2025, 02:09:17 pm
No, if they refuse to sign for any recorded delivery then all you'll be left with is proof they haven't received it.

Just email it and CC yourself in.

There’s no email contact on the letter, I assumed I’d need to post it!
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: DWMB2 on November 21, 2025, 08:46:11 am
No, if they refuse to sign for any recorded delivery then all you'll be left with is proof they haven't received it.

Just email it and CC yourself in.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 21, 2025, 08:26:30 am
Do I need to send this using a tracked service so I can prove they received it?
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 21, 2025, 05:18:05 am
Thank you so much. I will do just that!  :)
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: b789 on November 21, 2025, 05:04:37 am
In which case you submit the following formal complaint to ParkingEye:

Quote
Subject: Formal Complaint and Late Appeal – Parking Charge [707348/407430] – VRM [ABC1234]

Dear Sir or Madam,

I write as the registered keeper of vehicle [VRM], in relation to your “Final Notice” dated 13 November 2025, reference [707348/407430], regarding an alleged parking event at Aldermoor Way, Bristol on 29 January 2024.

This is the first correspondence I have ever received about this matter.

I have lived at my current address since 2015. I have owned this vehicle since 2019 and my V5C has shown this same correct address throughout. Despite this, I have never received any earlier Parking Charge Notice, Notice to Keeper, or reminder from ParkingEye concerning this vehicle or this location.

Accordingly:

1. I have had no prior knowledge of any alleged parking event or “offence” until receiving this Final Notice almost two years later.

2. I have been given no fair opportunity to see your evidence, to challenge the charge, or to identify the driver if I had wished to do so.

3. You cannot rely on Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) because no Notice to Keeper was ever served on me. I do not accept that mere assertion that a letter was “sent” is sufficient to establish service when I have a long-standing, stable address and have received other mail without any difficulty.

For the avoidance of doubt, I expressly rebut any suggestion that a Notice to Keeper was properly “given” or delivered to me. Any statutory or common-law presumption of delivery is rebuttable, not absolute. On the facts here it is rebutted. I have lived at this address since 2015, my V5C has shown this same address since 2019, and I have not experienced any systematic problem with lost post. In that context, my clear evidence that no Notice to Keeper or earlier Parking Charge Notice has ever arrived is sufficient to displace any bare assertion that a letter was “sent”.

You are therefore put to strict proof that any Notice to Keeper was actually posted and properly addressed. In particular, I require disclosure of:

– the exact name and address used (including postcode and any flat/building numbers);
– the date and time of alleged posting;
– the class and method of postage; and
– copies of any batch posting records, certificates of posting, or mailshot logs evidencing that the document left your possession correctly addressed and prepaid.

You are also reminded that paragraph 8.1.2(e), Note 2 of the Private Parking Single Code of Practice (Version 1.1, 17 February 2025) makes clear that any presumption of delivery is subject to contrary proof and that parking operators must retain a record of the date of posting of a notice, not merely the date on which it was generated or handed to a third-party mail consolidator. If you are unable to produce proper posting and address records, that will support my position that no Notice to Keeper was ever “given” in accordance with PoFA.

In the absence of such proof, you cannot establish that a Notice to Keeper was ever “given” in accordance with Schedule 4 of PoFA, and you have no lawful basis to pursue me as keeper.

For the avoidance of doubt, I am not admitting to being the driver and I am not identifying the driver. In the absence of a properly served Notice to Keeper, there is no lawful basis to pursue me as keeper.

Given the above, I require that you:

1. Cancel this Parking Charge immediately, as it has been pursued in an unfair and unreasonable manner, without proper notification or any prior chance to appeal.

2. In the alternative, if you refuse to cancel, please treat this as a formal complaint and a late appeal caused entirely by your failure to serve the original Notice to Keeper, and provide the following within 30 days:

– A full copy of the original PCN / Notice to Keeper (both sides) you say was issued in 2024;
– Copies of all subsequent letters you claim to have sent;
– Copies of all images, ANPR records, and site photographs that you intend to rely on;
– The date on which you obtained my data from the DVLA and any evidence that the address you used matches my V5C;
– Confirmation whether you are asserting keeper liability under PoFA 2012, and if so, an explanation of how you contend PoFA has been complied with given that no Notice to Keeper was ever received.

Please also confirm that no further action, including referral to debt recovery or initiation of court proceedings, will be taken while this complaint is under review and until you have provided the information requested above.

If you choose to pursue a claim despite having failed to serve any Notice to Keeper or give me any opportunity to appeal, I will draw this correspondence, and the requirements of the Private Parking Single Code of Practice, to the court’s attention and invite the judge to find that your conduct has been unreasonable.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Yours faithfully,

[Name]
[Postal address as per V5C]
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 20, 2025, 06:28:40 pm
Yep I’ve checked and everything is in order
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: DWMB2 on November 20, 2025, 01:42:04 pm
Have you got out the paper V5C document and checked it?

I don't say this because I doubt you, but you'd be amazed how many cases we've seen over the years where people are sure their car is registered to the correct address, then get the V5C out and spot a typo, or realise they never received one at all.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 20, 2025, 01:37:53 pm
Thanks for that. I’ve had the car since 2019 and lived at this address since 2015 so there is no chance that details have ever not been up to date.

So it’s something of a surprise to me that this is the absolute first I am hearing of it!
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: b789 on November 20, 2025, 10:52:23 am
These unregulated private parking firms rely on the recipients of their Parking Charge Notices (PCNs) being low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree who can be intimidated into paying up out of ignorance and fear. The first sign of a gullible recipient is when they refer to a PCN as an "offence" and/or a "fine".

I will give you £100 for every occurrence of the word "offence" or "fine" you can show me on any correspondence from them. A PCN is simply a speculative invoice for an alleged breach of contract by the driver. No offence and no fine.

Now we must first establish why you may not have heard anything about this until now. In the majority of cases, it is because at the time of the alleged contravention the Keepers address had not been updated after a move. Many Keepers don't realise that updating their drivers licence does not automatically also update their V5C.

So, before we move on, is your V5C up to date with your current address? Was it up to date with the correct address on or around the end of January, beginning of February 2024?

That letter is only a reminder that their speculative invoice has not been paid. As you know nothing about that invoice (PCN) there are some steps you can take. However, please confirm whether the V5C was up to date with the correct address where you were residing at the time of the alleged contravention.

When you've done that we can proceed.
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 20, 2025, 09:04:17 am
Thank you. Here is the letter.

There are no details to contact them by email and it says I have no opportunity to appeal

(https://i.postimg.cc/3NK69mY2/IMG-9792.jpg)
Title: Re: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: jfollows on November 20, 2025, 07:27:07 am
First, read https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/

Second, post up what you’ve received, with only your personal details obscured, as per the advice.

Thirdly, don’t call anyone, ever. Email or post only.

Fourthly, if the driver is identified, a case can be brought for six years.
Title: Threatening Parking Eye Claim nearly 2 years on??
Post by: Bristolfella on November 20, 2025, 05:47:36 am
Have just received a letter saying that I owe parking eye £100 from an offence from January 2024(!) which remains unpaid.

This is the first I’m hearing of any such offence, they mention an initial letter which I haven’t had.

The fine is £100, it says there is an appeals process but I’m not able to use it because 28 days have passed (well duh!)

Where do I stand here when I’ve had zero knowledge of this ‘offence’ until the “pay up in 14 days or we take you to court” stage?

There is a phone number there but only for payments.

It’s not the money but I’m peeved at the principle when I’ve had no notification whatsoever and we’re now almost two years down the line.

All advice greatly appreciated.