Free Traffic Legal Advice
Live cases legal advice => Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) => Topic started by: theeagleman on September 28, 2025, 05:58:47 pm
-
A win is a win. Well done !
-
Merton has cancelled, without informing it has cancelled it :)
Cancelled it only last week though
-
Also wanted to add that on the initial PCN on windscreen they mentioned "outside number 2" - that is inaccurate, as there is no odd door numbers of this road. Not sure if that makes any difference
Is it better to also just wait for the NTO?
I have searched, but could find nothing that relates to being "licensed" for anything PCN related.
-
Unfortunately, the council would only consider cancelling . . . for licensed delivery drivers
Repeated thrice!!
Is this a new LB Merton-specific by-law??
Persevere.
never heard of "licensed delivery driver" ... I thought having a driving license was enough :o
They are talking complete and utter tosh, (nothing new there, of course). If you were delivering something you are entitle to the loading exemption, but would need to show the need to park on DYLs. This applies to all loading activities, commercial or domestic.
The GSV is here. it was DYL all around and no bays free at the time of the alleged contravention
https://maps.app.goo.gl/rrnFDA6YJk6thxsc9
Also wanted to add that on the initial PCN on windscreen they mentioned "outside number 2" - that is innacurate, as there is no odd door numbers of this road. Not sure if that makes any difference
-
They are talking complete and utter tosh, (nothing new there, of course). If you were delivering something you are entitle to the loading exemption, but would need to show the need to park on DYLs. This applies to all loading activities, commercial or domestic.
-
Unfortunately, the council would only consider cancelling . . . for licensed delivery drivers
Repeated thrice!!
Is this a new LB Merton-specific by-law??
Persevere.
-
Hi folks,
The following PCN was given, and proof of delivery supplied, yet they rejected, and appears they did not read the appeal properly at all.
PCN + CEO Evidence (snippet)
(https://i.ibb.co/rf2pBQmh/PCN-Back.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/7xgVpqpD/PCN-Front.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/C59698B0/Evidence-1.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/8Dmx8CR5/Evidence-2.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/FpP1bY4/Evidence-3.jpg)
Appeal
(https://i.ibb.co/jZzvM99r/Initial-Appeal-1-Edit.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/7xSKc3Wg/Iniaital-Appeal-1-1-edit.jpg)
Evidence Request - Follow Up
(https://i.ibb.co/RGrFQLxC/Rejection-1.jpg)
Evidence supplied was driving license and initial appeal as as above
Rejection post follow up #1
(https://i.ibb.co/ynsHW3Cj/Follow-Up-1.jpg)
A bigger picture of the customer order plus arrow pointing to date and time of order and asked what other evidence can be supplied, but they sent the below.
Follow up #2
(https://i.ibb.co/4RH5RMsL/Follow-up-2.jpg)
Any suggestions? Thanks again!