Free Traffic Legal Advice

Live cases legal advice => Private parking tickets => Topic started by: Rosa52 on September 23, 2025, 09:24:53 pm

Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on December 18, 2025, 11:13:00 pm

b789, you are a Star! 

Thank you for the clear information as well as the advised content. 

I will issue that email later, tonight.

With appreciation.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: b789 on December 18, 2025, 08:56:33 pm
What you need to do now is shift this from being “your problem on the day” to being a recorded administrative failure by the mediation service, so that nothing adverse can later be inferred against you.

You already did what you were required to do. You completed the N180, you stated dates of unavailability, and you returned it in time. Once that is done, responsibility for scheduling lies entirely with the court’s mediation service, not with you.

The key point is that telephone mediation only works if both parties can be reliably contacted. You have already warned them, in advance, that you will be unavailable and potentially unreachable due to travel. They have ignored that information. That is not something you are required to fix by taking risks with unreliable communications abroad.

You should now put matters on the record in writing, before the mediation date.

Send a short, firm narrative email to the mediation service and copy in the court and the claimant. Do not ask politely for help and do not frame it as a favour. State facts and consequences.

Explain that you notified unavailable dates on your N180, that the mediation appointment has nevertheless been listed within that period, that you contacted them by telephone and were told it could not be changed, and that you will be in a country with unreliable telecommunications where calls may not connect at all.

Make it clear that you remain willing to mediate, but only on a date outside the unavailable period you already notified. Then state that if the mediation is not relisted and they cannot contact you on the day, this must be recorded as an inability to contact caused by the mediation service listing the appointment contrary to the information you provided, and not as a failure or refusal on your part.

That wording is important. You are not declining mediation. You are documenting that any failure will be the direct result of their scheduling decision.

Do not over-explain, justify travel, or offer to “try your best”. The moment you start saying you will attempt to take the call, you weaken your position and hand risk back to yourself. The court does not expect litigants to gamble with connectivity in a foreign country because an administrative body ignored their availability.

If they refuse to move the date, that refusal itself strengthens your position, provided it is documented.

As for the missing claimant N180, it is common and rarely consequential. There is no sanction for you at this stage, and it does not affect mediation. If you want to be tidy, send a brief line to the claimant asking for a copy of their filed N180 and noting that you have not been served with it. You can also mention this in passing to the court. Nothing turns on it unless directions are later disputed.

In short, your protection comes from making sure that, before the mediation date arrives, the file clearly shows that any inability to proceed was caused by the mediation service ignoring your stated unavailability. Once that is on the record, there is no procedural disadvantage to you at all.

Send the following email to scmreferrals@justice.gov.uk and CC DQ.CNBC@justice.gov.uk; the claimants solicitor and yourself:

Quote
Subject: Claim No. [XXXXXXX] – Mediation appointment listed during notified unavailability

I write in relation to the Small Claims Mediation appointment that has been listed in this matter.

On [date], I filed and served my Directions Questionnaire (Form N180). In that questionnaire, I clearly stated that I would be unavailable between [start date] and [end date].

Despite this, the mediation appointment has been scheduled for [date and time], which falls squarely within the period of unavailability I notified. I contacted the mediation service by telephone on [date] to request that the appointment be listed outside those dates and was informed that this would not be changed.

During the period in question I will be abroad in a location with unreliable telecommunications infrastructure, meaning there is a real risk that the mediator may be unable to reach me at all, or that any connection would be intermittent and unsuitable for a proper mediation call.

I remain willing to engage in mediation. However, this can only be done fairly if the appointment is listed outside the period of unavailability that I properly notified on my N180.

If the mediation appointment is not relisted and the mediator is unable to contact me on the day, this must be recorded as an inability to contact arising from the mediation service listing the appointment contrary to the information provided in my Directions Questionnaire, and not as any failure or refusal on my part to engage with mediation.

I would be grateful if this position could be noted on the court file and confirmed in writing.

Separately, I note that I have not been served with a copy of the claimant’s Directions Questionnaire. If it has already been filed, please ensure that a copy is provided to me.

Yours faithfully,

[Defendant’s name]

As for the mediation call itself, it is a total waste of time anyway. However, if you do attend a mediation call, here is the advice I provide for it:

For the mediation call, the only requirement is for you "attend" the call. It is not part of the judicial process and no judge is involved.

This is what I advise you to say when you receive the call from the mediator:

Before I set out my position, please confirm from the claimant’s side:

• the full name of the person attending for them;
• their role/position at their legal representative’s firm; and
• whether they hold written authority to negotiate and settle today.

Please relay that back to me before we continue.

After the mediator calls back...

If identified and authority confirmed:

Thank you. I’m content to proceed on that basis. My settlement offer is £0, or I invite the claimant to discontinue with no order as to costs.

If no/unclear authority:

Please record that the claimant’s attendee has not confirmed settlement authority. My position remains that liability is denied and my offer is £0, subject to prompt approval by an authorised solicitor if they choose to discontinue.

If the mediator probes your defence:

In what capacity are you asking that question? Are you legally trained?  If not, please refrain from offering opinions. I will be reporting any attempt to do so as inappropriate.”

All you need to know is the name and the position of the person acting for the claimant and report that back to us. It will be over within minutes. Complete waste of time otherwise.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on December 18, 2025, 08:11:24 pm

Hello Moderators,

Now back having been away for a few weeks.  In that time I forwarded N180 to CNBC & Claimant.  However, although I indicated dates I would not be available for the Mediation appointment, the allocation has been within that period.  I have checked by phone if a different date could be assigned, and the response was 'No'.  Since it is a date when I would be in a country without the best communication systems, I feel I may be at a disadvantage on the day if Mediator is unable to easily get through to me.

Also, should I have received Claimant's N180 by now?  MCOL site does not include it under the assigned Ref. number, and neither have I received any relevant email from them.

Any clarification based on your past experience would be appreciated.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 31, 2025, 10:31:10 pm

Thank you, so much.  It's a weight off my mind!

With kind regards
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: b789 on October 31, 2025, 09:42:38 pm
No reason you can't check online while you are away. All this is done by email. The physical N180 will arrive by post, but as I mentioned, you do not need the physical version. As soon as your MCOL updates to show that the N180 DQ has been sent, just fire off the one you've downloaded and prepared already. That's it.

Even if you were to miss the N180 initially, the court would send a reminder to return it.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 31, 2025, 09:03:19 pm
Hello b789,
This is a quick update to let you know that I have been checking MCOL daily, but it has thus far not updated anything after my submission was recorded.  I am leaving tomorrow morning, and will be away until early December. 

Shall keep on checking MCOL site, and am hoping both parties will email rather  than resort to the post. (CNBC's recent letter dated 10/10 is post-marked 14/10).  Very much aware my N180 is yet to be submitted - especially with information of which dates I will not be available for any mediation that could be proposed. 

In the meantime, thanks for your advice and guidance.


 
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 22, 2025, 11:47:00 pm

Many thanks, B789.  Shall follow your advice and let you know how I get on.

Regards
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: b789 on October 22, 2025, 12:06:35 am
You don't have to actually wait for the form to arrive. Once the MCOL history updates to say yours has been sent, just send yours following the advice here:

Quote
Having received your own N180 (make sure it is not simply a copy of the claimants N180) or been notified on MCOL that yours has been sent, do not use the paper form. Ignore all the other forms that came with it. you can discard those. Download your own N180 DQ here and fill it in on your computer. You sign it by simply typing your full name in the signature box.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/673341e779e9143625613543/N180_1124.pdf

Here are the answers to some of the less obvious questions:

• The name of the court is "Civil National Business Centre".

• To be completed by "Your full name" and you are the "Defendant".

• C1: "YES"

• D1: "NO". Reason: "I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions.
Given the Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living, having this case heard solely on papers would appear to put the Claimant at an unfair advantage, especially as they would no doubt prefer the Defendant not to have the opportunity to expose the issues in the Claimants template submissions or speak as the only true witness to events in question
.."

• F1: Whichever is your nearest county court. Use this to find it: https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/search-option

• F3: "1".

• Sign the form by simply typing your full name for the signature.

When you have completed the form, attach it to a single email addressed to both dq.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC in yourself. Make sure that the claim number is in the subject field of the email.

So, you don't have to wait for your form to arrive. You can download the form now, fill it in and just email it when your MCOL history updates to show yours has been sent.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 21, 2025, 11:56:26 pm

Thank you, B789, your quick response is appreciated. 

I'm concerned that if the N180 form does not arrive in the post before end of this month, I may not have the means to inform the court system.  (I'm hoping the email address would be used for the purpose).

When I checked via MCOL today there was no response yet from other side.  Not sure if the MCOL system can be used for informing of my non-availability?
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: b789 on October 21, 2025, 09:50:30 pm
You will eventually receive your N180 Directions Questionnaire (DQ) and you can put down in that form ny dates you will not be available over the next 6 months.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 21, 2025, 09:31:25 pm
Hello Moderators,

Have received acknowledgement from CNBC, of receipt of my defence forwarded via MCOL.

They state
"A copy is being served on the claimant.  The claimant may contact you direct to attempt to resolve any dispute.  If the dispute cannot be resolved informally, the claimant will inform the court that he wishes to proceed.  The court will then inform you of what will happen.
Where he wishes to proceed, the claimant must contact the court within 28 days after receiving a  copy of your defence.  After that period has elapsed, the claim will be stayed.  The only action the claimant can then take will be to apply to a judge for an order lifting the stay."

I have a problem in that I will be away from UK for 5 weeks from November, and am not sure what impact that will have on the normal process from this point on. I certainly do not want the Parking firm to win due to my absence!

(Do the documents forwarded to you earlier this month highlight any aspects that could be used in a witness statement?)

Would be grateful for your advice on how I should proceed.

Many thanks again for all you do.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 15, 2025, 01:00:44 pm

Thanks for your reply and the link.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: InterCity125 on October 11, 2025, 11:32:36 am
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/forum/library/guides-templates/member-guides/1418058-how-to-complete-an-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track-form

Something of an explanation on the above link.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: DWMB2 on October 11, 2025, 10:58:19 am
The purpose is to provide the court with the necessary information to process your case.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 11, 2025, 01:33:25 am

Hello,

Appreciate the advice, and I will look out for that correspondence.

Apologies if this appears a silly question, but I would be grateful if you could enlighten me on the purpose of the N180 form?

Thank you
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: jfollows on October 10, 2025, 01:26:56 pm
You do not need to panic.

In due course you will receive a N180 from DCB Legal and, later, a court letter giving you a date by which you have to supply your own. A few days’ absence will not matter, you will still have plenty of time. You may, however, want to prepare your own N180 now but do not submit it yet, per the following guidance:

Quote
Having received your own N180 (make sure it is not simply a copy of the claimants N180), do not use the paper form. Ignore all the other forms that came with it. you can discard those. Download your own here and fill it in on your computer. You sign it by simply typing your full name in the signature box.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/673341e779e9143625613543/N180_1124.pdf

Here are the answers to some of the less obvious questions:

• The name of the court is "Civil National Business Centre".

• To be completed by "Your full name" and you are the "Defendant".

• C1: "YES"

• D1: "NO". Reason: "I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions.
Given the Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living, having this case heard solely on papers would appear to put the Claimant at an unfair advantage, especially as they would no doubt prefer the Defendant not to have the opportunity to expose the issues in the Claimants template submissions or speak as the only true witness to events in question.."

• F1: Whichever is your nearest county court. Use this to find it: https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/search-option

• F3: "1".

• Sign the form by simply typing your full name for the signature.

When you have completed the form, attach it to a single email addressed to both dq.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC in yourself. Make sure that the claim number is in the subject field of the email.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 10, 2025, 12:06:07 am

Hello b789,
Yes, I have now submitted the suggested defence via MCOL.

Does the response come in the post or by email? 

I'm away from home for a few days, and am concerned that if allowed response time is less than a week, I might miss the deadline....

I trust the documents forwarded were received?

Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: b789 on October 03, 2025, 02:04:31 pm
Thank you. Have you submitted the defence yet?
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on October 03, 2025, 01:10:36 am
Thank you. 
Attached are copies of all correspondence received and sent, for your information.

(BTW - Imgur is no longer active for UK users from 30.09.25 so I have found an alternative image hosting website which can be accessed via this link: https://postimg.cc/gallery/MTBsbdW )
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: b789 on September 29, 2025, 01:54:42 pm
If you have managed to submit an AoS using MCOL, then you can also submit that defence using it. However, I understand your predicament regarding your lack of technological acuity. If you prefer to wait until you can get someone more adept, then it is not a problem.

Having submitted your AoS, you now plenty of time to submit the defence.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on September 29, 2025, 12:42:45 pm
Thank you, b789, for your comforting message.
As I'm elderly (thus slow), and not technologically adept I decided to buy time by completing the AOS on MCOL.

I have attempted to forward all correspondence received and sent for your perusal, but that has not yet been successful.  Tomorrow I will seek to obtain help from a young person to send them on to you.

In the meantime, thanks to you all.

Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: b789 on September 24, 2025, 02:58:43 pm
Slow down and stop panicking. You have plenty of time. The claim is not even served until 5 days after issue and it is only then that the clock starts ticking. Any deadline that is on a non-working day is advanced to the next working day.

With an issue date of 9th September you have until 4pm on Monday 29th September to submit your defence. If you submit an Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you would then have until 4pm on Monday 13th October to submit your defence.

You only need to submit an AoS if you need extra time to prepare your defence. If you want to submit an AoS then follow the instructions in this linked PDF:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqu3bask5m0zir/money-claim-online-How-to-Acknowledge.pdf?dl=0

Until very recently, we never advised using the MCOL to submit a defence. However, due to recent systemic failures within the CNBC, we feel that it is safer to now submit a short defence using MCOL as it is instantly submitted and entered into the "system". Whilst it will deny the use of some formatting or inclusion of transcripts etc. these can always be included with the Witness Statement (WS) later, if it ever progresses that far.

You will need to copy and paste it into the defence text box on MCOL. It has been checked to make sure that it will fit into the 122 lines limit.

Quote
1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety. The Defendant asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and that no debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not adequately disclose any comprehensible cause of action.

2. There is a lack of precise detail in the Particulars of Claim (PoC) in respect of the factual and legal allegations made against the Defendant such that the PoC do not adequately comply with CPR 16.4.

3. The Defendant is unable to plead properly to the PoC because:

(a) The contract referred to is not detailed or attached to the PoC in accordance with PD 16, para 7.3(1);

(b) The PoC do not state the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract (or contracts) which is/are relied on;

(c) The PoC do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons) why the claimant asserts the defendant has breached the contract (or contracts);

(d) The PoC do not state with sufficient particularity exactly where the breach occurred, the exact time when the breach occurred and how long it is alleged that the vehicle was parked before the parking charge was allegedly incurred;

(e) The PoC do not state precisely how the sum claimed is calculated, including the basis for any statutory interest, damages, or other charges;

(f) The PoC do not state what proportion of the claim is the parking charge and what proportion is damages;

(g) The PoC do not provide clarity on whether the Defendant is sued as the driver or the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant cannot plead alternative causes of action without specificity.

4. The Defendant submits that courts have previously struck out materially similar claims of their own initiative for failure to adequately comply with CPR 16.4, particularly where the Particulars of Claim failed to specify the contractual terms relied upon or explain the alleged breach with sufficient clarity.

5. In comparable cases involving modest sums, judges have found that requiring further case management steps would be disproportionate and contrary to the overriding objective. Accordingly, strike-out was deemed appropriate. The Defendant submits that the same reasoning applies in this case and invites the court to adopt a similar approach by striking out the claim due to the Claimant’s failure to adequately comply with CPR 16.4, rather than permitting an amendment. The Defendant proposes that the following Order be made:

Draft Order:

Of the Court's own initiative and upon reading the particulars of claim and the defence.

AND the court being of the view that the particulars of claim do not adequately comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a) because: (a) they do not set out the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract which is (or are) relied on; and (b) they do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons) why the claimant asserts that the defendant was in breach of contract.

AND the claimant could have complied with CPR 16.4(1)(a) had it served separate detailed particulars of claim, as it could have done pursuant to PD 7C, para 5.2, but chose not to do so.

AND upon the Court determining, having regard to the overriding objective (CPR 1.1), that it would be disproportionate to direct further pleadings or to allot any further share of the Court’s resources to this claim (for example by ordering further particulars of claim and a further defence, with consequent case management).

ORDER:

1. The claim is struck out.

2. Permission to either party to apply to set aside, vary or stay this order by application on notice, which must be filed at this Court not more than 7 days after service of this order, failing which no such application may be made.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on September 24, 2025, 11:43:26 am
Thank you very much, DWMB2, for your quick response.  My internet connection is sketchy & keeps dropping, so not been able to upload documents yet.

Do I fill in an online form for AOS (ticking box 1) ?

Should that be on www.moneyclaim.gov.uk as indicated on the material received or AOS CNBC@justice.gov.uk

Also, with 9/9/25 being issue date on Claim Form, which are the actual deadlines for 14 days, and 28 days? (Unsure if only working days are counted).

Appreciate your help.
Title: Re: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: DWMB2 on September 23, 2025, 10:38:24 pm
You can do the Acknowledgement of Service online which will allow some more time to look at the defence.
Title: Letter from Courts - URGENT
Post by: Rosa52 on September 23, 2025, 09:24:53 pm

URGENT HELP NEEDED, PLEASE!

Have just returned home after many days away (taking care of a relative), to find a Court letter dated 9/9/25. Since the 14 day deadline is close, I assume AoS needs to be sent out soonest? I would be grateful for clarification of the cut-off dates, and how to send off the AoS with correct details, please.

This is all due to a Parking Charge notice issued to me as Registered Keeper by Group Nexus(GN), because Driver of vehicle overstayed at a Motorway services car park on 11/12/2024.  Driver stopped at Leigh Delamere services due to an attack of Migraine coming on, and needing to take medication to prevent it getting worse. Since a long drive was ahead, and bouts of Migraine affected vision, the Driver decided it was best for safety reasons, to rest a while sitting in the car until the Migraine had passed, before continuing the journey.

Not expecting to stay long, the Driver had not paid attention to time of arrival, was wholly unaware that parking restrictions existed at this site, and was only focused on getting rid of the Migraine attack, to be able to resume the journey. After some time, when the Migraine had receded, Driver went in to use the facilities, purchased a coffee, and headed off.

Until informed of communication received from GN dated 23/01/25, Driver was not aware that free parking was restricted to 2 hours at this service station. (Said not seen any signs near where car had been parked).

GN had sent a Parking charge reminder dated 23/01/25 to me as Registered Keeper, in which they stated that documents dated 19/12/24 & 06/01/25 had also been previously issued.  As I had not received those (Christmas time mail issues?), on 30/01/25 I wrote a short letter to GN about that. 

Had no reply from GN, but thereafter, debt recovery letters from DcbL followed over next weeks. 

As RK, on 03/3/25 I wrote to GN referring to my letter of 30/01/25 not getting a response, and (using advice given on this forum), requesting a copy of original parking charge notice since the burden of proof was on them.

Received very brief letter dated 03/04/25 from CP Plus stating "the time within which to appeal has now expired".  I was not aware of this firm's connection to GN until this letter, but was unhappy that they were not following due process, and quite unconcerned that someone had been denied the appeal system.

Letter of Claim from DcbLegal dated 6/8/25 had arrived (again, while I was away), and I had very little time for the response (using advice from this forum's Moderators), which was emailed through on 4/9/25.  The automatic reply stated that they "aim to respond to correspondence where required as soon as possible".  Nothing thus far.

Now the letter from Courts needs managing, and with so little time to respond I'm in a panic, and desperately need your advice, please.

With grateful thanks in advance. 

(PS: Will upload all earlier correspondence for your perusal later tonight).