Free Traffic Legal Advice
Live cases legal advice => Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) => Topic started by: ConfusedD on August 03, 2025, 04:46:07 pm
-
Can you please post the adjudicators reasons section please, as we can't look up cases on the TPT website, unlike the much better London Tribunals statutory register.
-
;D
-
Thanks you everyone for your guidance, support, and advice, which helped me successfully win this case.
PCN RG84267225 - There is nothing to pay and the authority will cancel the penalty charge
This is because the alleged parking contravention did not occur.
-
Good luck.
My previous post regarding how their evidence was obtained etc...should have provided you with the basis of your appeal. But this is probably water under the bridge because your hearing has already taken place.
-
Apologies - Yes the council evidence pack was downloaded - but I'm going through a rough time now, and hadnt properly seen this.
I am not sure how strong my case is, as I havent uploaded my side documents yet, I do however have next 20 minutes to prepare - please find the link of evidence pack below
https://i.postimg.cc/hj2d780H/Evidence-Summary-RG00255-2510.png
https://postimg.cc/ZByRGd2c
(https://i.postimg.cc/ZByRGd2c/Evidence-Summary-RG00255-2510.png) (https://postimg.cc/ZByRGd2c)
-
Have you had the coucil's evidence pack?
-
Good evening
I have received notification that the Tribunal hearing with the adjudicator will take place at 11 am on 10th November
Should I upload my representation and the parking receipts to the tribunal now, ahead of the hearing on 10th November? Thanks
-
Go for the telephone or video hearing.
Thank you, I’ve chosen the telephone hearing option and just wondering what I should prepare?
I haven’t uploaded any evidence yet to the tribunal– does anyone know what to expect? Should I also upload the evidence the authority submitted here?
-
Go for the telephone or video hearing.
-
Just wait. TPT's administration of the process seems totally proper and informative.
The authority has to make a decision.
Does it want its abuse of the Red Route exemption to serving a PCN by hand by use of a mobile camera(we've yet to explore whether the device itself is 'approved) which captures perhaps 1-2 seconds of activity exposed in front of the adjudicator?
Does it really believe what it wrote when it was a judge in its own cause and have confidence to argue this to the adjudicator?
IMO, NO and NO.
Just wait for the next contact from TPT (why did you write TFL?).
Sorry - its TPT clearly I spent too much time in TFL
Just catching up on this now – I completely missed the Tribunal's email saying the authority had uploaded its evidence. I read I need to respond within 7 days – thankfully, today is the 7th day. Honestly, it got buried with lot spam emails and I totally overlooked it. Genuine mistake.
These are the two options I’ve now
I would like the Adjudicator to decide my case now
I would like a Telephone Hearing / Video Hearing
Not sure whether I should go with the second one or if I should upload more evidence – like my earlier representation and the parking receipt and let the Adjudicator decide.
Would really appreciate any advice or support on what to do next
-
Just wait. TPT's administration of the process seems totally proper and informative.
The authority has to make a decision.
Does it want its abuse of the Red Route exemption to serving a PCN by hand by use of a mobile camera(we've yet to explore whether the device itself is 'approved) which captures perhaps 1-2 seconds of activity exposed in front of the adjudicator?
Does it really believe what it wrote when it was a judge in its own cause and have confidence to argue this to the adjudicator?
IMO, NO and NO.
Just wait for the next contact from TPT (why did you write TFL?).
-
Hi All
I received the below update from TFL - Should I wait until the Authority upload their case files? please guide me
Appeal Update:
Your appeal has been registered
Case Number: RG00255-2510
Your appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal has now been registered and the Authority that issued the Penalty Charge Notice(s) has confirmed details of the case.
What happens now?
The Authority will decide whether or not to contest your appeal within 14 days.
If the Authority decides not to contest your appeal, you will be notified that your appeal has been allowed and will have nothing to pay.
If the Authority decides to contest your appeal, it will upload any evidence it has to support its case against you to your online case file.
The Traffic Penalty Tribunal will then ask you to log-in to view and (if you choose) respond to the Authority’s evidence, before indicating whether:
you would like your case to be passed straight to an independent
Traffic Penalty Tribunal Adjudicator for a decision
OR
you would like a hearing with an Adjudicator to explain your case further, either by telephone or video. The Authority may also be present during this hearing. Please note: If you do not choose either of the above options when prompted, an Adjudicator will go ahead and decide the case without a hearing.
-
Just register pl. Everything else can be added later.
Thank you- please see below status
Your appeal has been submitted
and allocated reference number RG00255-2510
What happens next:
The details of your appeal will be checked and confirmed. The Authority will then get an opportunity to upload their evidence for this appeal.
The Traffic Penalty Tribunal will contact you via email with updates, or when we need you to do something.
What you need to do:
Keep an eye out for any emails relating to your appeal and follow the instructions given.
You can access your appeal at any time by logging into this portal. Here you can see the current status of your appeal and check any actions required by you. You can also add more evidence to support your claim if you wish by selecting the Evidence tab at the top of the page.
If you don’t hear from us within 48 hours, please email help@trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk or call us on 0800 160 1999.
-
Just register pl. Everything else can be added later.
-
OP, with respect you have lost the thread of your case.
You made formal reps to the authority which were rejected by notice dated 9 Sept.
You therefore have/had until 8 October to register your appeal with the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
All this requires is you to get online, quote your NOR code and register. You do not submit War and Peace: contravention did not occur, personal hearing, rely upon my formal reps would suffice.
Have you registered??
(I haven't the time to trawl through all the posts, pl just confirm. If you haven't, then do it now. Lengthy submissions can wait)
I misunderstood the previous advice here and assumed I had already won the case :-\ , so I didn’t take any action to register the appeal. I panicked this morning and quickly started the appeal process, added my representation. Now I see there’s no option to remove or edit it to a personal hearing.
Should I still go ahead and submit it? Sorry for the confusion.
-
OP, with respect you have lost the thread of your case.
You made formal reps to the authority which were rejected by notice dated 9 Sept.
You therefore have/had until 8 October to register your appeal with the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
All this requires is you to get online, quote your NOR code and register. You do not submit War and Peace: contravention did not occur, personal hearing, rely upon my formal reps would suffice.
Have you registered??
(I haven't the time to trawl through all the posts, pl just confirm. If you haven't, then do it now. Lengthy submissions can wait)
-
Thank you all - I totally lost track of the deadline- I tot I already won the case so I didnt realise I still needed to respond.
Here is my formal representation - is this good enough
I am writing to make formal representations in respect of PCN, issued under the provisions of the Traffic Management Act 2004.
Having carefully reviewed the evidence provided by the enforcement authority, I submit that no contravention occurred, and I request that the PCN be cancelled for the following reasons:
1. Exempt Stop for Safe Manoeuvre into an Adjacent Parking Bay
At the time of the alleged contravention, my vehicle was briefly stationary in a live traffic lane adjacent to a clearly marked, conditionally exempted parking bay on a Red Route. The vehicle was stopped only momentarily due to the need to exercise proper care before reversing into the parking place.
This was not a voluntary or discretionary stop, but a necessary and lawful action taken in the interest of road safety. Under Transport for London Red Route regulations, such stops are exempt from enforcement, as they are considered circumstances beyond the driver’s control when required to safely perform a lawful parking manoeuvre.
The vehicle was indicating to turn and in the process of positioning safely. This was not idling, waiting, or unauthorised stopping — it was a brief and necessary pause in compliance with safe driving standards.
2. CCTV Evidence is Inconclusive and Lacks Context
It is essential to bring to the authority’s attention that the CCTV evidence was captured from a mobile enforcement vehicle and comprises only one second of footage showing the vehicle stationary.
This footage does not show what occurred before or after the moment in question and therefore fails to establish whether a contravention took place. In fact, the extreme brevity of the recording supports my account that the stop was momentary and part of a lawful and exempt parking manoeuvre.
A PCN cannot be upheld where the enforcement evidence is insufficient to prove a contravention occurred beyond reasonable doubt.
Furthermore, it is worth noting that in this one-second clip, the Mini vehicle adjacent to mine is also indicating — clearly preparing to pull out of the bay to give space. This further supports my position that I was legitimately and safely manoeuvring into that space, and not stopping unlawfully.
3. Relevant Case Law — PCN Cancelled in Similar Circumstances
This situation closely mirrors the facts in case reference 2250164419, heard before Adjudicator Michael Burke on 30 July 2025, concerning a PCN issued by the London Borough of Redbridge.
In that case, the vehicle had stopped briefly (6 seconds) on a double red line while the driver assessed whether parking in a nearby bay was permitted, before reversing into it. The adjudicator ruled:
“A vehicle must stop in order to be able to reverse park in a bay. I am satisfied the 6-second stop was part of a traffic manoeuvre which does not amount to a contravention… Accordingly I allow the appeal.”
In my case, the stop was even briefer — just one second, with the vehicle preparing to park in an adjacent bay. It is therefore entirely consistent with the adjudicator’s reasoning that this type of stop is not a contravention, as it forms part of a necessary and lawful traffic manoeuvre.
4. No Obstruction or Traffic Impact
At no time did the vehicle obstruct traffic or occupy any restricted markings. The road remained clear and traffic continued to flow freely. There was no infringement of "Keep Clear" zones, bus lanes, pedestrian crossings, or similar.
5. Disproportionate Enforcement
In accordance with the Secretary of State’s Statutory Guidance to Local Authorities on Civil Parking Enforcement, local authorities are expected to enforce regulations in a manner that is fair, proportionate, and in the public interest.
Issuing a penalty based solely on an inconclusive, one-second video — without context or clear evidence of a prohibited act — is neither fair nor proportionate. It undermines public confidence in enforcement where legitimate and exempt driving behaviour is penalised.
Conclusion
Given that:
The stop was lawful, brief, and exempt under Red Route regulations,
The CCTV footage is inconclusive and lacks the context needed to support enforcement,
A recent adjudicator’s ruling (2250164419) confirms these actions do not constitute a contravention,
There was no obstruction or traffic interference, and
Enforcement in this case is clearly disproportionate,
I respectfully request that this Penalty Charge Notice be cancelled.
Please also note that I have attached a copy of the parking receipt, confirming my intent to park lawfully and further supporting that the brief stop was in preparation for parking in a permitted bay.
Thank you for your time and consideration
-
Case reference 2250164419
Appellant xxxxxxxxx
Authority London Borough of Redbridge
VRM GF58DTO
PCN Details
PCN AF30617067
Contravention date 28 Feb 2025
Contravention time 20:47:00
Contravention location Cranbrook Road
Penalty amount GBP 110.00
Contravention Stopped where prohibited on red route or clearway
Referral date -
Decision Date 30 Jul 2025
Adjudicator Michael Burke
Appeal decision Appeal allowed
Direction
cancel the Penalty Charge Notice.
Reasons
The allegation in this case is that the vehicle was stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway). The Appellant does not dispute this but says that she only pulled up with a view to parking in a bay. Having read the time plate she was unsure if she was permitted to park so she drove away. She says that she was only stopped for a minute.
The Enforcement Authority seek to enforce the PCN on the basis the vehicle stopped on a double red line. The enforcement camera evidence confirms this. However, this was only for 6 seconds and the vehicle then began to reverse into a bay. A vehicle must stop in order to be able to reverse park in a bay. I am satisfied the 6-second stop was part of a traffic manoeuvre which does not amount to a contravention, any more than if the Appellant had been required to stop on the double red line in traffic. Accordingly I allow the appeal.
-
The contravention is no stopping, so the length of the stop is not the issue alone, but is when part of a driving situation in the middle of the road adjacent to parking bays.
The adjudicator will want to look at the situation which you can say was letting a car out of a parking bay so you could claim it, a situation that happens 1000s of times a day.
-
Just trying to understand
-
Do not concede anything like this or make apologies.
Remember their evidence i.e. a moving camera which had your vehicle in sight for LESS THAN 1 SECOND.
How the **** could the authority make the claims they have? It's preposterous.
Anyway, all you have to do at this stage is register your appeal. We don't need War and Peace - despite your obvious inclinations to write something of this length!
Contravention did not occur.
Procedural impropriety.
You rely upon your formal representations but will add further representations after receipt of the authority's evidence.
Come back here when you've registered.
In their response, they stated:
CCTV footage clearly shows the vehicle had stopped. It also shows the vehicle was causing an obstruction as the CCTV car had to pull out into the opposite lane to get past the vehicle.
But isn’t it normal are they using the movement of their own camera car as evidence of obstruction?
-
Did you use a parking app as that will have a record.
But anyway you should address what the adjudicator will see in the video as you were positioned correctly to allow the car out.
Here’s the image from my CC statement — it shows the date and lists Reading Reading RDG as the location, but there’s no other detail related to parking.
https://imgur.com/a/Js3DUbz
-
+1
and when registering, opt for a personal (=telephone or video) hearing.
Never choose a decision on papers.
-
Do not concede anything like this or make apologies.
Remember their evidence i.e. a moving camera which had your vehicle in sight for LESS THAN 1 SECOND.
How the **** could the authority make the claims they have? It's preposterous.
Anyway, all you have to do at this stage is register your appeal. We don't need War and Peace - despite your obvious inclinations to write something of this length!
Contravention did not occur.
Procedural impropriety.
You rely upon your formal representations but will add further representations after receipt of the authority's evidence.
Come back here when you've registered.
-
Did you use a parking app as that will have a record.
But anyway you should address what the adjudicator will see in the video as you were positioned correctly to allow the car out.
-
Yes, that's right — the car parked in front of the Mini was pulling out, and I had reversed slightly to give them space to move. My intention was to take that space as soon as they left. And I did pay for parking but I don’t have the exact time or details of the payment, gotta check my bank statements
-
Looking at this again it was the car from of the Mini you were waiting to pull out and take the space?
And you paid for parking?
Presumably you have a record of the parking payment so what time was that?
Also you weren't waiting to reverse immediately I presume but for the car to pull out and you drove past the slot and reversed in?
-
Please see the link below for the rejection letter I received from Reading Borough Council
https://imgur.com/a/JDoDSpI
I’ve also drafted an appeal below to the adjudicator. I would really appreciate it if anyone could let me know
Do I stand a good chance of winning this at the tribunal? Is my appeal strong, or does it need improvement?
If not am I still within the 14-day discount period?
The rejection letter is dated 9th September, but I only received it on 12th September, so I’m not sure if the discount window has closed or not.
Adding Reading Council rejection incase the above link is not clear-
Applying Discretion:
I have considered the representations and reviewed the time and date stamped footage recorded by the CCTV car at the time of the contravention. I can confirm that the above noted vehicle was stopped where prohibited on a red route. The area where your vehicle was stopped was subject to a 'No Waiting restriction. The restriction is applicable 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. It is the driver's responsibility to act upon information given to them through traffic signs and road markings, as stipulated in the Highway Code. With regards to your correspondence, the CCTV footage clearly shows the vehicle had stopped. It also
shows the vehicle was causing an obstruction as the CCTV car had to pull out into the opposite lane to get pass the vehicle. Furthermore, the CCTV footage shows there is no available parking space and no evidence that one is about to become available. Applying discretion when reviewing representations against a PCN requires consideration of both the points raised against the issue of the PCN as well as the evidence recorded at the time of the contravention. A judgement is made on the evidence and a decision made accordingly. The decision can be to either cancel the charge or continue pursue payment. Reading Borough Council has exercised discretion when considering your representation and has made a decision not to cancel the PCN. Your representation has been considered by this office in accordance with the requirement of the Traffic Management Act 2004 (as amended), but after full consideration of the representations made and all other circumstances relating to the issue of Penalty Charge Notice, I have to advise you that grounds for representation against the Penalty Charge Notice have not been established. This Notice is issued as a formal Notice of rejection under Part 6, Section 80 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 and Regulation 6 of The Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic Contraventions (Approved Devices, Charging Guidelines and General Provisions) (England) Regulations 2022.
---------------------
My Appeal to the adjudicator.
I am appealing the rejection of PCN RG84267225 issued by Reading Borough Council on the grounds that no contravention occurred and the vehicle was not stopped in contravention of the red route regulations.
1. Lawful and Exempt Stop to Execute Parking Manoeuvre
At the time in question, I stopped briefly adjacent to a marked red route parking bay in order to safely reverse into an available parking space. This stop was made as part of a lawful and necessary manoeuvre, and such stops are recognised as exempt from enforcement under Transport for London and general red route enforcement guidance.
I had signalled my intention to park, and paused briefly only because the space was still occupied by another vehicle at the time. As soon as it moved, I would have completed the manoeuvre safely.
2. Evidence Contradicts Council’s Justification
The council claimed in their Notice of Rejection that: There is no available parking space and no evidence that one is about to become available.
However, the council's own CCTV evidence clearly shows the brake lights of a vehicle occupying the space, confirming that: A space was present, just not immediately accessible.My stop was in direct relation to that space becoming available.
This detail directly supports my version of events and undermines the council’s claim.
3. Brief Stop, No Obstruction
My vehicle was stationary only momentarily and did not cause an obstruction. Traffic could continue, and there were no “Keep Clear” or other safety-critical markings in the area. The stop was made with full regard for safety and good driving practice.
4. Disproportionate Enforcement
The council relied on very limited CCTV evidence — a brief clip showing my vehicle stopped without context of what occurred before or after. There is no evidence of prolonged stopping, idling, or abandoning the vehicle. The enforcement action is disproportionate in this case and contrary to the spirit of fair and evidence-based enforcement.
I respectfully request that the adjudicator consider:
The evidence of brake lights in the intended parking space,
The lawful nature of my brief stop, and
The lack of substantive evidence supporting the council’s position.
This was not a contravention, and I ask that the PCN be cancelled.
Supporting Evidence:The first image from CCTV showing the brake lights of the vehicle occupying the parking bay.
-
Can't see the attachment, I'm afraid.
Anyway, that's their last throw of the dice as judges in their own cause as the next stage is the adjudicator if you choose to appeal.
-
I have attached the response received regarding the PCN appeal
https://imgur.com/a/FB9pfaa
https://imgur.com/a/Pc9oIk8
https://imgur.com/iH49Z3E
https://imgur.com/yFzvm2W
https://imgur.com/a/FzQV2ze
unfortunately, it has been rejected :(
What do we do now? Any advice?
-
In strict parlance, the exemption is 'beyond the driver's control'. This applies millions of times every day when every car travelling along every red route stops because traffic is stop/start or there are traffic lights ahead or whatever. Each time this is a prima facie contravention because the prohibition extends fully across a traffic lane!
-
The vehicle was briefly stationary in a live traffic lane adjacent to a clearly marked, conditionally exempted parking bay on a red route and was stopped only momentarily due to the need to exercise proper care before reversing into the parking place. This is an exemption from the Red Route prohibition i.e. circumstances beyond the driver's control.
At this point it is necessary to bring to the authority's attention that their CCTV could not confirm what I did after stopping because the CCTV evidence (taken from a mobile vehicle) lasts for 1 second.
Thank you for your feedback, I have revised and submitted my representation focusing on parking maneuvering exemption, short CCTV evidence and fair enforcement. I appreciate your time- will come when I hear the decision.
-
The vehicle was briefly stationary in a live traffic lane adjacent to a clearly marked, conditionally exempted parking bay on a red route and was stopped only momentarily due to the need to exercise proper care before reversing into the parking place. This is an exemption from the Red Route prohibition i.e. circumstances beyond the driver's control.
At this point it is necessary to bring to the authority's attention that their CCTV could not confirm what I did after stopping because the CCTV evidence (taken from a mobile vehicle) lasts for 1 second.
-
I'll look tomorrow. At first glance it's OTT.
Of course you were stopped on a red route: it's a red route and you were stopped! The RR extends from the centre-line of the carriageway to the back of the footway. So we can forget all about reference to the TSRGD.
Sure, @ H C Andersen I will remove the 1st point, just wondering if you had a chance to go over the other points as well? Reading council made some pretty clear mistakes, and I dont want valid grounds of appeal being overlooked just because of my incorrect technical reference.
-
No signage was contravened, and no statutory prohibition under the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003,
The PCN is served under the Traffic Management Act 2004, and reference to the LLA & TfL Act 2003 is irrelevant, as it does not apply in Reading.
Appreciate you clarifying- This makes sense, I will remove the reference LLA & TfL Act 2003 since its not relevant here
-
No signage was contravened, and no statutory prohibition under the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003,
The PCN is served under the Traffic Management Act 2004, and reference to the LLA & TfL Act 2003 is irrelevant, as it does not apply in Reading.
-
I'll look tomorrow. At first glance it's OTT.
Of course you were stopped on a red route: it's a red route and you were stopped! The RR extends from the centre-line of the carriageway to the back of the footway. So we can forget all about reference to the TSRGD.
-
Thanks @H C Andersen for highlighting the key points, I've drafted below appeal - used some points from online, let me know if I have added anything incorrectly.
I am writing to make formal representations under the provisions of the Traffic Management Act 2004, in respect of Penalty Charge Notice number issued.
Having carefully reviewed the evidence provided by the enforcement authority, I submit that no contravention occurred, and I request that the PCN be cancelled for the following reasons:
1. No Contravention as Defined by Applicable Regulations
The vehicle was briefly stationary in a live traffic lane adjacent to a clearly marked, conditionally exempted parking bay on a red route. The video evidence shows that the vehicle was not stopped in a prohibited area such as a red route clearway or within a marked “Keep Clear” zone, nor was it causing obstruction.
No signage was contravened, and no statutory prohibition under the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003, or the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 (TSRGD), appears to have been breached.
2. Legitimate Driving Maneuver – Not “Parking” or “Stopping” for the Purposes of Enforcement
The vehicle had come to a stop at a red signal and the engine was switched off. When the traffic signal turned green, I attempted to restart the vehicle, which momentarily stalled. During this short delay, I indicated left to allow vehicles to pass while preparing to reverse into one of several available spaces in the adjacent bay — a lawful and legitimate maneuver which does not constitute a prohibited stop or illegal parking.
Being stationary for a few seconds in a traffic lane while preparing to carry out a safe and legal parking maneuver is not a contravention under current legislation or TMO (Traffic Management Order) restrictions.
3. De Minimis Non Curat Lex – The Law Does Not Concern Itself With Trifles
The duration of the vehicle being stationary in the traffic lane was approximately one second, as per the council’s own CCTV evidence. This is clearly a de minimis event and cannot reasonably be considered a contravention warranting enforcement action.
4. Council Evidence Supports My Account and Undermines the Alleged Contravention
The CCTV footage provided confirms:
The vehicle was not obstructing traffic;
The stop was extremely brief;
The adjacent parking bay was not full;
The “KEEP CLEAR” marking, while present, was not supported by appropriate traffic signs and does not constitute a formal restriction;
There was no indication of loading/unloading, alighting or waiting contrary to applicable regulations.
Thus, the council’s own evidence does not support the issuance of this PCN and is, in fact, consistent with a legitimate driving action.
5. Request for Cancellation in Accordance with Fair and Proportionate Enforcement
In accordance with the Secretary of State’s Statutory Guidance to Local Authorities on the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions, enforcement authorities are expected to act fairly, proportionately, and in the interest of justice. Issuing a PCN for a brief, lawful stop under the above circumstances is neither fair nor proportionate.
Therefore, for the reasons stated above, There is no contravention, the PCN must be cancelled.
-
Can we forget about your recollections please. If there's one common feature on this forum it's driver's mistaken recollections!
What does their evidence show?
Device - mobile camera;
Stationary car by road works managed by temporary traffic lights;
Est. 3 car spaces between the car and 'wait here' sign;
Duration in view of camera - 1 second;
Colour of traffic light - green;
Location: On a 24/7 red route, in middle of traffic lane and adjacent to 24/7 conditional exempted parking place marked correctly with white lines but improperly marked with the words KEEP CLEAR which created a space for at least 3 cars.
FFS.
I stopped at a red light and switched off my engine.
The lights changed to green.
Traffic set off, but I didn't immediately as I had to start my engine etc.
Car stalled; got flustered; put on left indicator to invite traffic to pass.
How the hell would the predatory(I don't usually like this word, it's overused and misplaced more often than not, but IMO it applies here) camera car know what circumstances led to you being stationary.
But in your case you were driving in the traffic lane, observed at least 3 vacant spaces in the parking place, stopped in the traffic lane beyond where you intended to park only for as long as it took you to stop, indicate left and reverse into the parking spaces, reversing being your preferred mode of parking and absolutely legitimate.
You have viewed the council's evidence which is totally consistent with the facts and wholly inconsistent with a decision to demand a penalty for carrying out a legitimate driving manoeuvre.
There is no contravention, the PCN must be cancelled.
-
Replace 'respectfully' with 'therefore'.
They will reject your reps as they do to almost all representations, because they know that <95% of people then just cough-up. You have to be prepared to stand your ground and take them to the adjudicators at the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. This means the full PCN penalty is in play, of course.
Thanks for pointing that out — I understand they usually reject most representations just to push people into paying. I checked the footage thank you @stamfordman and it clearly shows I didn’t stop in the clearway — the car was just briefly manoeuvring and still in motion.
I’m ready to take it to adjudication if they reject, but since these things often come down to technical details, I’d really appreciate advice on how to strengthen my case. Any successful appeal in a similar situation — especially involving red routes or clearway cases? Would really appreciate an appeal to understand how it played out.
-
I can't see a contravention here?
(https://i.ibb.co/fzPTcqp9/Y3-E3b-Foz-TFBTU3px-Tit2-MXZDZFZFU2-NFRGFJNk1t-TFJr-Q0-Js-Yzkw-Sn-Ex-L2-JPUFBVVURzb-EZp-Njc0-VHJLNTV.gif)
(https://i.ibb.co/0R6hxtQf/Screenshot-2025-08-08-at-13-23-04.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/nsrBwn0Q/Screenshot-2025-08-08-at-13-22-57.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/svMX6GtC/Screenshot-2025-08-08-at-13-22-50.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/1YX1Xm9x/Screenshot-2025-08-08-at-13-25-32.png)
-
Replace 'respectfully' with 'therefore'.
They will reject your reps as they do to almost all representations, because they know that <95% of people then just cough-up. You have to be prepared to stand your ground and take them to the adjudicators at the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. This means the full PCN penalty is in play, of course.
-
Hello,
Could anyone please let me know if this appeal sounds okay to send?
I am writing to formally challenge the Penalty Charge Notice on the basis that the alleged contravention did not occur.
At the time in question, my vehicle did not stop or park in a prohibited clearway area. I briefly manoeuvred my vehicle while waiting for a vehicle in a marked bay to vacate. This involved barely pulling across slightly, but my vehicle was never stationary within the clearway, nor was it parked at any point in a restricted area.
The movement was part of a normal, slow-moving traffic adjustment, and there was no stopping, waiting, or parking in breach of any restriction. The vehicle remained in motion and was promptly parked in a legal bay once available, at which point I paid for parking in full compliance with local requirements.
I respectfully request that the CCTV footage and photographic evidence be reviewed closely, as it will clearly show:
The vehicle was not stationary in the clearway,
The vehicle was in transitional movement, not stopped,
There was no obstruction or unlawful advantage gained.
As such, I believe the PCN was issued in error and should be cancelled.
Thank you
-
Hi all
Will this Photo in the PCN support my case? It doesn't clearly show my car is parked in clear way.
@stamfordman and @Hippocrates - Could you please advice
Thanks
-
Thank you for your response, PCN attached
-
Post the PCN, blanking only name and address.
-
Hi All
I received a PCN by post on Friday for a contravention dated 22nd July. The alleged offence is stopping on a red route/clearway.
Here’s what happened: There’s a clearway sign at the entrance of apartment building, with marked parking bays just before & after it. Unfortunately, all spaces in the parking bays were already taken at that time. Except one car was just about to leave, they had their indicators on, so I briefly (less than a minute) reversed my car into the clear-way sign (I think, as I dint know at that time about the clear way sign), not to unblock the traffic from behind. Once the car moved, I parked my car and paid for the parking.
The PCN does not show my car parked, only an image of it on the road – presumably because I wasn’t stationary for long.
Given the very short stop and lack of evidence showing my car parked, do I have a chance to challenge this PCN?
Here the is the link for google maps :
https://maps.app.goo.gl/mJSsSZwnnAojFLEk8
Thanks in advance for any advice.