Free Traffic Legal Advice

Live cases legal advice => Private parking tickets => Topic started by: Barbudaprince on July 26, 2025, 09:13:56 pm

Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on December 09, 2025, 03:41:18 pm
That comment is broadly accurate in practical terms.

An SRA complaint on its own rarely produces a direct outcome for an individual complainant. The SRA’s role is regulatory, not remedial—it doesn’t intervene in your case or award compensation, and it won’t compel BW Legal to reply to you. What it can do is record the conduct concern. If multiple, consistent complaints build a pattern about the same firm or individual, the SRA may open an investigation into systemic issues such as poor supervision, misleading conduct, or misuse of non-authorised staff.

So, while a single complaint may not appear to “achieve” much, it still serves several purposes:

• it creates a regulatory record;
• it pressures the firm’s Compliance Officer for Legal Practice (COLP) to report and respond internally; and
• it demonstrates to the court (if raised later) that you acted proportionately by referring the matter to the appropriate regulator.

In short, it’s about accountability and building a paper trail, not about revoking licences after one complaint.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: jfollows on December 09, 2025, 03:13:55 pm
Ok will do. What does the SRA complaint achieve ? Do they lose their solicitors licence?
No, it achieves nothing at all directly, organisations like the SRA exist to protect solicitors’ interest, a bit like “HR” in most companies.
But if they receive repeated and consistent complaints about a specific solicitor, they may feel compelled to do something.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on December 09, 2025, 03:05:56 pm
Ok will do. What does the SRA complaint achieve ? Do they lose their solicitors licence?
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on December 09, 2025, 02:21:39 pm
In which case send the following to them:

Quote
Subject: Final Notice – Settlement Authority Confirmation and Conduct Concerns – [Claim Ref / Case No.]

Dear Sirs,

I refer to my email of [date] (no response received).

This is a final 7-day notice. Please provide by return:

1. Confirmation whether Ms Sanah Haleem attended the SCMS mediation on [date]; and
2. Confirmation that the individual who attended for the Claimant personally held full, current written authority from your client to negotiate and conclude settlement at that session without further reference.

If authority was delegated, identify the delegator and confirm the date/scope. A solicitor-signed certification or a redacted copy will suffice.

Absent a satisfactory response within 7 days, I will lodge a formal complaint with the SRA (copied to your COLP) on the following grounds for investigation:

Potential misleading/non-transparent communications with an opposing litigant regarding the representative’s decision-making authority during ADR (SRA Principles: integrity; public trust; Code – not to mislead or cause others to be misled).
Failure to engage substantively with reasonable correspondence material to ADR effectiveness and case management (Principles: proper standard of service; public trust; Code – effective, prompt, clear communication).
Supervision and reserved activity concerns: if a non-authorised person attended without genuine settlement authority or if reserved acts are being undertaken without appropriate authorisation/supervision (Principles: integrity; Code – proper supervision, competence, and control of work).

For the avoidance of doubt, if it transpires the mediation proceeded without a representative holding full settlement authority, I will place this before the court on conduct and costs (CPR 27.14(2)(g)) and, if necessary, seek appropriate directions/sanctions.

Unless you indicate otherwise, I will treat your continued silence as refusal to confirm authority.

Yours faithfully,

[Your full name]
Defendant
[Your address]
[Your email]
And if they respond, show us and if they don't remind us so that you can make the SRA complaint.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on December 09, 2025, 01:50:43 pm
Nope :(
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on December 09, 2025, 11:19:55 am
Did you get a response to that email????
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on December 08, 2025, 10:39:01 pm
Thanks. That was done.

Received a letter for a transfer of proceedings about the case being allocated by the judge at Brentford County Court
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on November 04, 2025, 04:23:18 pm
I would send the following to BW Legal:

Quote
Subject: Confirmation of Settlement Authority – [Claim Ref/Case No.]

Dear Sirs,

I write regarding the SCMS mediation held on [insert date].

The mediator stated that Ms Sanah Haleem (paralegal, BW Legal) held written authority to negotiate and conclude settlement on behalf of the Claimant. For the avoidance of doubt, this request does not seek disclosure of any without prejudice content or negotiation positions. It is confined strictly to procedural matters relevant to conduct and costs.

Please confirm:
• Whether Ms Haleem personally attended the mediation; and
• That the individual who did attend held full, current written authority from your client to negotiate and conclude settlement at that session without further reference.

If authority was delegated, please:
• Identify the delegator;
• Confirm the date and scope of the delegation; and
• Provide either a solicitor-signed confirmation or a redacted copy of the delegation document.

If it emerges that the session proceeded without a representative holding full settlement authority, I will rely on that conduct in relation to costs under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I will invite the court to draw adverse inferences and consider appropriate sanctions, including recovery of wasted costs for an abortive mediation. I reserve all rights to make any appropriate application.

Please respond within seven days.

Yours faithfully,

[Your full name]
Defendant
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on November 04, 2025, 03:26:34 pm
So the person who has written authority to negotiate and settle is Sanah Haleem, who is a paralegal for BWLegal.

I offered £0 per the above guidance and they did not accept (no suprise there) and stated that they would take the matter to my local court
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on September 30, 2025, 04:09:17 pm
Hi I've received the mediation appointment. Should I stick to the following gathered from another case:

Yes.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on September 30, 2025, 01:15:35 pm
Hi I've received the mediation appointment. Should I stick to the following gathered from another case:

"Before I set out my position, please confirm from the claimant’s side:

• the full name of the person attending for them;
• their role/position at their legal representative’s firm; and
• whether they hold written authority to negotiate and settle today.

Please relay that back to me before we continue.”

After the mediator calls back...

If identified and authority confirmed:

“Thank you. I’m content to proceed on that basis. My settlement offer is £0, or I invite the claimant to discontinue with no order as to costs.”

If no/unclear authority:

“Please record that the claimant’s attendee has not confirmed settlement authority. My position remains that liability is denied and my offer is £0, subject to prompt approval by an authorised solicitor if they choose to discontinue.”

All you need to know is the name and the position of the person acting for the claimant and report that back to us. It will be over within minutes. Complete waste of time otherwise.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on September 19, 2025, 03:41:00 pm
Yes sent to BWLEGAL, copied CNBC and received the automated response!
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on September 19, 2025, 11:13:32 am
When you sent the N180DQ form to the CNBC, did you copy in BW Legal? I know I put the wrong bulk litigators email address in my response, but it was pointed out in the next post.

It won't materially affect anything if you didn't send a copy to BW Legal. However, when you sent it, did you receive an auto-response email from the CNBC acknowledging receipt of the email?
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on September 18, 2025, 09:36:54 pm
Hi, I haven't had  any correspondence back from BWlegal or the courts. But not entirely sure what to expect. What happens next ?
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: DWMB2 on August 28, 2025, 11:49:13 pm
You've written to the wrong law firm, it is BW Legal who are involved in your case.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on August 28, 2025, 10:49:21 pm
Had this email come through today from DCB legal -

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

DCB Legal write further to your recent email.

 

Please note, DCB Legal are unable to locate your file with the information provided.

 

To enable DCB Legal to locate your file and action your query accordingly, please provide the following;

 

• Full name
• First line address/postcode
• DCB Legal reference number

What would be my reference number?
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on August 19, 2025, 02:46:37 pm
Yes. Just continue to follow the advice. N180 DQ next followed by mediation call and then it will be allocation to your local county court and directions from the procedural judge with hearing date and deadlines.

Will be interesting to see the Witness Statement from the claimant which will be written by an employee of BW Legal and can be largely dismissed as hearsay.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on August 18, 2025, 10:30:06 pm
Hi all received the attached letters today - I assume this means I need to undertake the above process and so will do this tomorrow.

Will add these to the Google drive link.



Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on August 06, 2025, 05:33:25 pm
Thanks - nothing on MCOL history as yet. Hopefully they will not proceed to claim.

Received this in the post. Will just add to case and Google drive link for ref.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on July 31, 2025, 02:19:45 pm
Nothing else to do until you receive acknowledgement from the claimant that they have received your defence and their client intends to proceed. They are likely to include a copy of their own N180 Directions Questionnaire which you can simply file.

Keep checking your MCOL history and when it says your N189 DQ has been sent, don't wait for it to arrive, just follow these instructions:

Having received your own N180 (make sure it is not simply a copy of the claimants N180), do not use the paper form. Ignore all the other forms that came with it. you can discard those. Download your own here and fill it in on your computer. You sign it by simply typing your full name in the signature box.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/673341e779e9143625613543/N180_1124.pdf

Here are the answers to some of the less obvious questions:

• The name of the court is "Civil National Business Centre".

• To be completed by "Your full name" and you are the "Defendant".

• C1: "YES"

• D1: "NO". Reason: "I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions.
Given the Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living, having this case heard solely on papers would appear to put the Claimant at an unfair advantage, especially as they would no doubt prefer the Defendant not to have the opportunity to expose the issues in the Claimants template submissions or speak as the only true witness to events in question
.."

• F1: Whichever is your nearest county court. Use this to find it: https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/search-option

• F3: "1".

• Sign the form by simply typing your full name for the signature.

When you have completed the form, attach it to a single email addressed to both dq.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC in yourself. Make sure that the claim number is in the subject field of the email.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 31, 2025, 01:42:14 pm
Thank you for your advice thus far. I submitted the above text as defence.

Do I need to do anything in the interim?
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on July 31, 2025, 01:27:17 pm
The defence needs to be as short and concise as possible. Judges hate it when they have to rail through a lengthy defence in a small claim. The defence is simply a set of hooks which you can later hang your witness statement on.

So, with that in mind and the rubbish PoC served and likely too earn brownie points with the judge, I propose you simply submit the following as your defence in MCOL. It has been checked for the 65 character limit per line and is well within the 122 line limit. Simply copy and paste it into the MCOL defence box:

Quote
1. The Defendant denies the claim in full. No contract was
formed, no breach occurred, and no debt is owed. The claim is
legally and procedurally deficient.

2. The Defendant is a leaseholder with a pre-existing right to
park under Clause 4.15 of the lease. This clause governs parking
and does not authorise third-party enforcement or delegate
rights to the Claimant.

3. The lease takes precedence. No separate contract could
arise from signage where parking is already regulated by lease.
The Claimant’s assertion of a contractual licence is legally
flawed.

4. The Particulars of Claim (PoC) fail to comply with CPR 16.4
and PD 16.7.3(1). The Claimant has not quoted or exhibited the
alleged contractual terms, nor identified any specific breach.

5. The PoC do not specify whether the Defendant is pursued as
driver or keeper. This ambiguity renders the claim incoherent
and procedurally improper.

6. The alleged contraventions (“Permit Required”, “No Parking on
Access Roads”, etc.) are bare assertions. No evidence is
provided of signage, terms, or acceptance.

7. The claimed sum of £510 is unexplained. No breakdown,
calculation, or legal basis is given for the charges or “debt
recovery costs.”

8. The PoC are vague, unsupported, and legally incoherent. The
claim should be struck out under CPR 3.4(2)(a) as disclosing no
reasonable grounds.

9. The Defendant submits that the claim is so vague and
procedurally deficient that it fails to disclose any reasonable
grounds. The PoC breach CPR 16.4 and PD 16.7.3(1), and no
legally recognisable cause of action is pleaded. Given the
modest value and disproportionate use of court resources, the
Defendant invites the court to strike out the claim under CPR
3.4(2)(a) rather than permit amendment. The following Draft
Order is proposed:

Draft Order:

Of the Court's own initiative and upon reading the particulars
of claim and the defence.

AND the court being of the view that the Particulars of Claim,
though served separately, remain deficient and do not comply
with CPR 16.4(1)(a) and PD 16.7.3(1), because:

(a) They do not set out the exact wording of the clause(s) of
the terms and conditions relied upon; and

(b) They do not adequately set out the reason(s) why the
Claimant asserts that the Defendant was in breach of contract.

AND upon the claim being for a modest sum, such that the court
considers it disproportionate and contrary to the overriding
objective to allocate further resources by ordering amended
pleadings and further case management.

ORDER:
1. The claim is struck out.
2. Permission to either party to apply to set aside, vary or
stay this order by application on notice, which must be filed at
this Court not more than 5 days after service of this order,
failing which no such application may be made.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: jfollows on July 30, 2025, 09:37:17 pm
It is public, yes.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 30, 2025, 06:24:38 pm
Please see link to Google Drive https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1nn7ERCJ9LCaf19v6RyJ5ZhvsJb7T4mYX?usp=drive_link

Would be grateful if you could let me know if this is all public on your end.

I have also uploaded some similar template responses would appreciate if you confirm if a good idea if I mixed these with my specific defence points. It seems like the defence size is character-limited so I will need to be careful.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 28, 2025, 10:53:10 pm
To be clear, when you say "documents relying on", do you mean documents I haven't posted onto this forum post already?
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: DWMB2 on July 28, 2025, 10:39:57 pm
If you want assistance, then I suggest you post all the documents you are relying on in Google Drive (suitably redacted of personal info) and make it "public". Once that is done, we can review them.
^^^
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 28, 2025, 09:15:28 pm
Hi, I have submitted an AoS today via MCOL. Any thoughts much appreciated.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on July 28, 2025, 12:23:50 pm
You have a strong defence and are not “toast” at all. Below is a clear summary of the key points in your favour:

You are a resident and your lease gives you rights in relation to parking. The lease takes legal priority over any signs put up later. There is nothing in your lease granting UKCPM any enforcement powers or the right to override your rights as a resident.

The signage is vague, with small print and unclear wording. It refers to “access roads” and “roadways”, but you were parked in an open space which is not defined on the signs. The signs do not clearly explain the terms, so no binding contract can be formed.

The PCNs all list the wrong postcode (W4 5SA), which does not exist. The actual address is W4 5BB. That mistake brings into question the accuracy and enforceability of the notices, and creates uncertainty about where the alleged breach happened.

All three PCNs are non-compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. They do not specify a “period of parking” as required under paragraph 9(2)(a). Instead, they only show a single timestamp, which is not sufficient. This point was confirmed in Brennan v PPS (2024), where the court held that without a defined period, keeper liability cannot arise. Since you have not admitted to being or identified the driver, UKCPM cannot hold you liable as keeper.

The £510 claimed includes £210 in added “debt recovery costs”, which are not enforceable in small claims and are often struck out as an abuse of process. The courts have criticised these false additions in recent cases.

You were parked as a resident to access your building, and there is currently no designated parking at the site. You were not a trespasser or unauthorised visitor.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on July 28, 2025, 11:52:37 am
If you want assistance, then I suggest you post all the documents you are relying on in Google Drive (suitably redacted of personal info) and make it "public". Once that is done, we can review them.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 27, 2025, 07:57:34 pm
In the response pack came a

- admission form N9A
- defence and counterclaim form N9B
- acknowledgement of service

I cannot see any reference to any other forms.
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 27, 2025, 05:52:35 pm
Hi,

I am a resident, yes. Vehicle was parked at the location for access to the building. There is no parking access at the building currently.


The lease says the following - see attached.

Haven't appealed any of them, no.

I will proceed with the acceptance of service and build a defence. Grateful for any advice

Claim was issued through the CNBC. I will check later if it came with a N1SDT form. POC sent separately by BWLEGAL on behalf of UK CPM.





[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: b789 on July 27, 2025, 12:23:07 pm
Why was the vehicle parked there for three different dates? Are you, the Keeper, a resident? If so, what does your lease say about parking?

With an issue date of 18th July, you have until 4pm on Wednesday 6th August March to submit your defence. If you submit an Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you would then have until 4pm on Monday 20th August to submit your defence.

If you want to submit an AoS then follow the instructions in this linked PDF:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqu3bask5m0zir/money-claim-online-How-to-Acknowledge.pdf?dl=0

As this is has detailed Particulars of Claim (PoC), it will need a different defence to the ones we usually provide. Before we can advise, we need to know the reason for the vehicle being at the location. Were these Parking Charge Notices (PCNs) ever appealed? If so, what was put in the appeals?

Was the claim issued through MCOL with an N1SDT Claim Form and then further PoC sent within 14 days for the claim being issued?
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 27, 2025, 11:23:32 am
Statement of particulars of claim dated 25/7/25

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 27, 2025, 11:16:53 am
PCN 30/4/24

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 27, 2025, 11:12:00 am
PCN 11/5/24

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 27, 2025, 11:07:00 am
PCN - 4/5/24



[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 27, 2025, 10:56:22 am
Signs on the site. Note they do not refer to no parking in bays/open spaces across the site. I am skeptical as to whether the parking demonstrated once in bay and twice on open spaces fall into "roadways" "access road" definition.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 27, 2025, 10:55:17 am
Signs on the site. Note they do not refer to no parking in bays/open spaces across the site. I am skeptical as to whether the parking demonstrated once in bay and twice on open spaces fall into "roadways" "access road" definition.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: 3 Private parking tickets - being pursued for all 3 and had a CCJ claim made
Post by: Barbudaprince on July 26, 2025, 09:13:56 pm
Hi everyone,

I have received a CCJ claim against me for 3 separate parking charge notices by BPA member - UK CPM.

Things I have noted may be used in my defence:

- Signs have small writing and are difficult to read, particularly the Ts and Cs.

-UK CPM have used the incorrect postal code on all of the PCNs at the site.

-The signs refer to access roads, roadways and does not refer to open spaces, where my vehicle was parked.

The claim is for £510. Do I have enough a defence or am I toast ?

Additional details -

CCJ claim issued dated: 18/07/2025 so I have 14 days to respond to this claim.

PCN dates:

30/04/2024
04/05/2024
11/05/2024


Google street view location (although you cannot see the signs you get the general idea - https://maps.app.goo.gl/3MNz9drr83Ecxhsy9

Address: Wheatstone House, 650-654 Chiswick High Rd., London W4 5BB

They have incorrectly reproduced this to: Wheatstone House, 650 Chiswick High Road, Chiswick, London, W4 5SA, which doesn't exist as an address.

I can send photos of the signs tomorrow.

UK CPM have sent me their particulars of claim via BWlegal also.

Thanks for your thoughts :)