Free Traffic Legal Advice

Live cases legal advice => Private parking tickets => Topic started by: Blue97 on June 03, 2025, 09:04:40 pm

Title: Re: Private parking fine ignored
Post by: b789 on June 06, 2025, 12:33:23 pm
You will receive a letter from HMCTS informing you that the claimant has been sent a copy of your defence. You will then receive a letter from DCB Legal informing you that their client intends to proceed and usually an offer to settle (which you DO NOT accept) and a copy of their N180 DQ.

You will receive your own copy of the N180 DQ form but you will have already downloaded and prepared your own form and when you receive your paper one, you send you PDF one to the CNBC and also CC in DCB Legal and yourself. You will then be given a date for a telephone mediation. This is not part of the judicial process so don't get any knickers in a twist about this. All you are queried to do is "attend" the call. You offer £0 and it is over in minutes.

Eventually, the claim is allocated to your local county court and you will receive a hearing date and some deadlines by which your Witness Statement must be submitted. You won't need to do that as the order will also include a deadline date by which the claimant must pay the trial fee of £27. Before that date the claim will either be struck out or discontinued and that will be the end of the matter.
Title: Re: Private parking fine ignored
Post by: Blue97 on June 06, 2025, 12:26:50 pm
Thanks B789, so I've done as you've advised and sent the defence and draft order. What can i expect to happen now going forward?
Title: Re: Private parking fine ignored
Post by: b789 on June 03, 2025, 09:44:46 pm
With an issue date of 29th May, you have until 4pm on Tuesday 17th June to submit your defence. If you submit an Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you would then have until 4pm on Tuesday 1st July to submit your defence.

If you want to submit an AoS then follow the instructions in this linked PDF:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqu3bask5m0zir/money-claim-online-How-to-Acknowledge.pdf?dl=0

Otherwise, here is the defence and link to the draft order that goes with it. You only need to edit your name and the claim number. You sign the defence by typing your full name for the signature and date it. There is nothing to edit in the draft order.

When you're ready you combine both documents as a single PDF attachment and send as an attachment in an email to claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and CC in yourself. The claim number must be in the email subject field and in the body of the email just put: "Please find attached the defence and draft order in the matter of Euro Car Parks Ltd v [your full name] Claim no.: [claim number]."

Quote
IN THE COUNTY COURT
Claim No: [Claim Number]

BETWEEN:

Euro Car Parks Ltd

Claimant

- and -

[Defendant's Full Name]


Defendant



DEFENCE

1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety. The Defendant asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and that no debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not adequately disclose any comprehensible cause of action.

2. There is a lack of precise detail in the Particulars of Claim (PoC) in respect of the factual and legal allegations made against the Defendant such that the PoC do not comply with CPR 16.4.

3. The Defendant is unable to plead properly to the PoC because:

(a) The contract referred to is not detailed or attached to the PoC in accordance with CPR PD 16(7.5);

(b) The PoC do not state the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract (or contracts) which is/are relied on;

(c) The PoC do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons) why the claimant asserts the defendant has breached the contract (or contracts)

(d) The PoC do not state with sufficient particularity exactly where the breach occurred, the exact time when the breach occurred and how long it is alleged that the vehicle was parked before the parking charge was allegedly incurred;

(e) The PoC do not state precisely how the sum claimed is calculated, including the basis for any statutory interest, damages, or other charges;

(f) The PoC do not state what proportion of the claim is the parking charge and what proportion is damages;

(g) The PoC do not provide clarity on whether the Defendant is sued as the driver or the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant cannot plead alternative causes of action without specificity.

4. The Defendant attaches to this defence a copy of a draft order approved by a district judge at another court. The court struck out the claim of its own initiative after determining that the Particulars of Claim failed to comply with CPR 16.4. The judge noted that the claimant had failed to:

(i) Set out the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions relied upon;

(ii) Adequately explain the reasons why the defendant was allegedly in breach of contract;

(iii) Provide separate, detailed Particulars of Claim as permitted under CPR PD 7C.5.2(2).

(iv) The court further observed that, given the modest sum claimed, requiring further case management steps would be disproportionate and contrary to the overriding objective. Accordingly, the judge struck out the claim outright rather than permitting an amendment.

5. The Defendant submits that the same reasoning applies in this case and invites the court to adopt a similar approach by striking out the claim for the Claimant’s failure to comply with CPR 16.4.

Statement of truth

I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

Signed:


Date:

Draft Order for the defence (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/tcewefk7daozuje25chkl/Strikeout-order-v2.pdf?rlkey=wxnymo8mwcma2jj8xihjm7pdx&st=nbtf0cn6&dl=0)
Title: Private parking fine ignored
Post by: Blue97 on June 03, 2025, 09:04:40 pm
Hi all,

On the 16/04/2024 i was issued a Parking charge notice from DCBL on behalf of Euro car parks Limited stating that i was not authorised to park on private land located on hastingwood business park. However, at the time of issue my car was undergoing maintenance with a local mechanic shop in the same area. At the time i was sent the first letter the mechanic advised to ignore the charge as multiple clients to the shop receive these charges and nothing becomes of it.

Over the space of the last year i have received a handful of reminder letters of which i have ignored as well.

As of today however, i have received a letter from the HM Courts & Tribune service because a "money claim has been made against" me. This is not a CCJ, but if I do not respond before the response date, "the claimant could request a CCJ against" me.

Any and all advice on the matter would be greatly appreciated as this is my first time ever dealing with such a scenario

[attachment deleted by admin]