Free Traffic Legal Advice

Live cases legal advice => Private parking tickets => Topic started by: mostafa.hendawi@gmail.com on April 16, 2025, 05:55:07 pm

Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: mostafa.hendawi@gmail.com on December 09, 2025, 05:15:44 pm
Thank you all for your help and advice. I have retracted the files and will follow up with the court. Thanks again for your patience
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: b789 on December 09, 2025, 04:57:33 pm
That document is a County Court Judgment in default. It says you did not reply to the claim form, so the court has entered judgment against you for £315.24, dated 04-NOV-2025, payable “forthwith”.

Because more than one calendar month has now passed since 4 November, simply paying the £315.24 will not remove the CCJ from your credit record. It would only mark it as “satisfied”. The CCJ will still sit on your file for six years unless it is set aside by a judge.

From here you really only have two realistic choices.

First option is to accept the CCJ. You either pay the £315.24 to DCB Legal (as the form explains) or you do not. If you pay, the judgment becomes “satisfied”; if you do not, it remains “unsatisfied”. In both cases it stays on your credit file for six years and will make any borrowing or mortgage application more difficult. The court will not do anything further unless the claimant applies for enforcement.

Second option is to apply to have the default judgment set aside. This is the only route that can actually remove the CCJ. In your case there is at least an arguable ground for a “mandatory” set aside because you did email a defence to claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk on 23 April and you say you can prove it.  How are you going to "prove" it? Did you receive the auto acknowledgement from the CNBC that confirmed receipt of the email? Did you CC yourself and receive it? Do you have the original sent email with the headers intact that show the date and time of sending and the SMTP server response that it was received?

The judgment says you did not reply to the claim form, which appears to be wrong if your defence was received on time. For a set-aside application you would:

– Phone the Civil National Business Centre with the claim number M9KF44K6. Ask them whether they have any record at all of your defence filed on 23 April and ask for the exact date the default judgment was entered (it should match 4 November 2025 on the order). Make a note of what they say, who you spoke to and the time and date of the call.

– Prepare a short timeline in your own words: when you received the claim, when you emailed the defence, what you attached, that you heard nothing further (no N180, no allocation, no hearing notice), when you first opened this judgment letter, and what you did immediately afterwards.

– Keep safe your proof of sending the defence: the sent email with date and time, the attachment, and the copy that was CC’d to yourself. If there was any auto-acknowledgement from the court, keep that too.

You then complete an N244 application asking the court to set aside the default judgment, attaching three things: a witness statement with your timeline and an explanation of the error, the evidence of your defence email, and a copy of the defence itself. You ask the court to set the judgment aside under CPR 13.2 because a defence was filed on time and judgment should not have been entered at all, or alternatively under CPR 13.3 because you have a real prospect of defending the claim and you acted promptly once you became aware of the judgment. There is a court fee to pay for this application, and there will usually be a short hearing where you explain to a judge what happened.

If you decide not to make a set-aside application, then there is nothing more the court will do for you. In that situation the only remaining decision is whether you pay the £315.24 to avoid any risk of enforcement action such as bailiffs in the future, accepting that the CCJ will remain on your credit file for six years either way.

So, in plain terms: you cannot “ask the court to realise their mistake” informally or by email and expect them to fix this for you. You must either live with the CCJ (paid or unpaid) or take positive action with an N244 application and fee to try to have the default judgment cancelled.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: b789 on December 09, 2025, 04:48:04 pm
I've no idea what is with the stupid poll. None of those questions apply. It is too late otherwise even just pay the CCJ as it will now remain on your credit file for the next 6 years marked as "satisfied", which is about one degree less financially painful than simply not bothering to pay it.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: b789 on December 09, 2025, 04:45:21 pm
I've had to report that post because you have left not only your name and address exposed, but even your Date of Birth. It won't take long for someone to take your identity over and screw you penniless.

Use a tiny bit of common sense and redact any personal information before you make it public.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: jfollows on December 09, 2025, 02:18:23 pm
It’s all on the original poster, I think I’ve done what I can. I agree you need to see it, the OP keeps on restricting the documents so we can’t see them. My guess and hope is that this was part of the mess earlier in the year with incorrect default judgments, but without the information it’s only a guess.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: b789 on December 09, 2025, 02:12:35 pm
I still need to see it. However, it would help us and you if you make a timeline of what happened on what dates and we can then assess what is the best course of action.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: jfollows on December 09, 2025, 01:34:20 pm
Yes, it’s gone back to the restricted document, but when it wasn’t it was a judgment in default as you guess.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: b789 on December 09, 2025, 01:32:43 pm
I still can't access whatever document you are trying to show us, so I am unable to assist util you reveal the document, which I presume is a form of Judgment in Default.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: jfollows on December 09, 2025, 11:20:14 am
You need to follow the instructions under Note to the defendant on what you have uploaded, but you will get better advice from others than you will from me on the process.

See also https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/hmcts-ongoing-issues-with-email-submissions/ which might apply in this case. Essentially there are examples of the courts getting this wrong; if so it can be fixed but I am not the person to advise you on this.

Wait for others to provide input.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: mostafa.hendawi@gmail.com on December 09, 2025, 10:54:53 am
Oh no! I have proof of the email I sent as per your instructions on 23 Apr to claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk

I received no Further letters until this one in November.

How do I communicate with the court? Do you think I should just settle the amount after they realise they didn't respond to my email and didn't send me N10?

Thanks again - a bit worried now.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: jfollows on December 09, 2025, 10:35:55 am
That letter contains your name and address which we don’t need to know and you may want to redact.
But something is missing because it’s telling you that the case against you has been successful and you will now owe money which, if not paid within a month, will lead to a record on your credit file.

This happened between your submitting a defence in April and November. You should have received a N180 from the court, and the case should have been allocated to a court local to you, and all the time you should have received letters from the court.

Do you know if this happened and was ignored, or otherwise?

The letter you have posted says you did not reply to the claim form. If you did, and you can provide some kind of evidence, eg in the form of an acknowledgment of receipt, then the court may be in error.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: mostafa.hendawi@gmail.com on December 09, 2025, 10:22:13 am
Sincere apologies, here is the correct link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cn4tPENwUJStBXYlgcF_EeJV_lHZ0uAK?usp=sharing
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: jfollows on December 09, 2025, 09:15:57 am
The web site also has instructions in the sticky READ THIS FIRST post.
However you have not set up permissions correctly on your Google drive post, I can not view it.
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: DWMB2 on December 09, 2025, 09:14:21 am
That link is asking me to request access, you need to make it open to view
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: mostafa.hendawi@gmail.com on December 09, 2025, 09:09:45 am
I got the mail while I was on holiday to see my family.

Attachment included here in the link - the website doesn't allow me to attach.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cn4tPENwUJStBXYlgcF_EeJV_lHZ0uAK?usp=drive_link
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: b789 on December 06, 2025, 12:50:47 pm
You received some court communication over a month ago but are only now asking for advice about it? There is nothing "attached" so I cannot advise further. The ball is back in your court (excuse the pun).

Posting Images (https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/posting-images)
Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: mostafa.hendawi@gmail.com on December 06, 2025, 06:39:17 am
Good morning,
Firstly thank you for helping me. I am very grateful.

I have followed your instructions in every point; however I received another court letter on the same topic 4 Nov and I need further help please.

See attached. Any guidance would be much appreciated.

Title: Re: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: b789 on April 16, 2025, 07:57:29 pm
With an issue date of 10th April, you have until 4pm on Tuesday 29th April to submit your defence. If you submit an Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you would then have until 4pm on Tuesday 13th May to submit your defence.

If you want to submit an AoS then follow the instructions in this linked PDF:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqu3bask5m0zir/money-claim-online-How-to-Acknowledge.pdf?dl=0

Otherwise, here is the defence and link to the draft order that goes with it. You only need to edit your name and the claim number. You sign the defence by typing your full name for the signature and date it. There is nothing to edit in the draft order.

When you're ready you combine both documents as a single PDF attachment and send as an attachment in an email to claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and CC in yourself. The claim number must be in the email subject field and in the body of the email just put: "Please find attached the defence and draft order in the matter of Euro Car Parks Ltd v [your full name] Claim no.: [claim number]."

Quote
IN THE COUNTY COURT
Claim No: [Claim Number]

BETWEEN:

Euro Car Parks Ltd

Claimant

- and -

[Defendant's Full Name]


Defendant



DEFENCE

1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety. The Defendant asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and that no debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not adequately disclose any comprehensible cause of action.

2. There is a lack of precise detail in the Particulars of Claim (PoC) in respect of the factual and legal allegations made against the Defendant such that the PoC do not comply with CPR 16.4.

3. The Defendant is unable to plead properly to the PoC because:

(a) The contract referred to is not detailed or attached to the PoC in accordance with CPR PD 16(7.5);

(b) The PoC do not state the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract (or contracts) which is/are relied on;

(c) The PoC do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons) why the claimant asserts the defendant has breached the contract (or contracts)

(d) The PoC do not state with sufficient particularity exactly where the breach occurred, the exact time when the breach occurred and how long it is alleged that the vehicle was parked before the parking charge was allegedly incurred;

(e) The PoC do not state precisely how the sum claimed is calculated, including the basis for any statutory interest, damages, or other charges;

(f) The PoC do not state what proportion of the claim is the parking charge and what proportion is damages;

(g) The PoC do not provide clarity on whether the Defendant is sued as the driver or the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant cannot plead alternative causes of action without specificity.

4. The Defendant attaches to this defence a copy of a draft order approved by a district judge at another court. The court struck out the claim of its own initiative after determining that the Particulars of Claim failed to comply with CPR 16.4. The judge noted that the claimant had failed to:

(i) Set out the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions relied upon;

(ii) Adequately explain the reasons why the defendant was allegedly in breach of contract;

(iii) Provide separate, detailed Particulars of Claim as permitted under CPR PD 7C.5.2(2).

(iv) The court further observed that, given the modest sum claimed, requiring further case management steps would be disproportionate and contrary to the overriding objective. Accordingly, the judge struck out the claim outright rather than permitting an amendment.

5. The Defendant submits that the same reasoning applies in this case and invites the court to adopt a similar approach by striking out the claim for the Claimant’s failure to comply with CPR 16.4.

Statement of truth

I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

Signed:


Date:

Draft Order for the defence (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/tcewefk7daozuje25chkl/Strikeout-order-v2.pdf?rlkey=wxnymo8mwcma2jj8xihjm7pdx&st=nbtf0cn6&dl=0)
Title: Court Claim - Euro Car Parks - Priory Retail Park Collier Woods
Post by: mostafa.hendawi@gmail.com on April 16, 2025, 05:55:07 pm
The car registered keeper visited the car park: Priory Collier Woods back in Feb 2023. Note I have no recollection of this at this point of time. This is the google maps street view.

https://shorturl.at/JGl1e

It has clear signs that it is 2 hours maximum stay with no option to pay. Probably received a PCN and ignored it. I travel a lot part of my work and don't really pay attention to these claims as they never mount to anything and I know I didn't leave the car overnight, it's maximum an extra hour.

Now received a claim from the court for 286 GBP for this.

Could you please advise what would be the best next step? Thanks

I attached the court hearing removing personal details.

[attachimg=1]

[attachment deleted by admin]