Why on earth do you imagine that a claim issued in your uncle's name can be responded to in your name? SNAFU.
You now need to urgently contact the CNCB and send the following email to AOS.CNBC@justice.gov.uk, making sure you also CC in yourself:
Subject: Correction of Acknowledgment of Service – Wrong Name Submitted – [Claim No. XXXXXXXX]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing regarding Claim Number [XXXXXXXX]. An Acknowledgment of Service (AoS) was recently submitted via the MCOL portal in error, in the name of [Nephew’s Full Name]. This was a genuine mistake, as the named defendant is [Uncle’s Full Name], the registered keeper of the vehicle and the person named on the claim form.
Please could the incorrect AoS be disregarded or amended so that the defendant, [Uncle’s Full Name], can be correctly recorded as having acknowledged service of the claim? The intention was always to acknowledge service on his behalf, and we respectfully request the opportunity to rectify the error so that a Defence can be filed within the proper timeframe.
We would be grateful for your confirmation and any guidance on how to proceed if further steps are required.
Yours faithfully,
[Full Name of Nephew]
On behalf of [Uncle’s Full Name]
Await the Court's Response
The court may:
• Correct the AoS internally and update the record to reflect the defendant's correct name
• Or allow re-submission by unlocking the AoS on MCOL
• Or advise that a Defence may still be submitted in the correct name, provided it's within time
Time for filing the Defence remains 33 days from the issue date of the claim form, assuming the AoS was timely. Even if the AoS was in the wrong name, the court is likely to exercise discretion to allow correction — particularly if no prejudice has been caused.
With an issue date of 28th April, you have until 4pm on Monday 19th May to submit your defence. If you have submitted an Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you then have until 4pm on Monday 2nd June to submit your defence.
If you want to submit an AoS then follow the instructions in this linked PDF:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqu3bask5m0zir/money-claim-online-How-to-Acknowledge.pdf?dl=0
Otherwise, here is the defence and link to the draft order that goes with it. You only need to edit your name and the claim number. You sign the defence by typing your full name for the signature and date it. There is nothing to edit in the draft order.
When you're ready you combine both documents as a single PDF attachment and send as an attachment in an email to claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and CC in yourself. The claim number must be in the email subject field and in the body of the email just put: "Please find attached the defence and draft order in the matter of UK Parking Control Ltd v [your full name] Claim no.: [claim number]."
IN THE COUNTY COURT
Claim No: [Claim Number]
BETWEEN:
UK Parking Control Ltd
Claimant
- and -
[Defendant's Full Name]
Defendant
DEFENCE
1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety. The Defendant asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and that no debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not adequately disclose any comprehensible cause of action.
2. There is a lack of precise detail in the Particulars of Claim (PoC) in respect of the factual and legal allegations made against the Defendant such that the PoC do not comply with CPR 16.4.
3. The Defendant is unable to plead properly to the PoC because:
(a) The contract referred to is not detailed or attached to the PoC in accordance with CPR PD 16(7.5);
(b) The PoC do not state the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract (or contracts) which is/are relied on;
(c) The PoC do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons) why the claimant asserts the defendant has breached the contract (or contracts)
(d) The PoC do not state with sufficient particularity exactly where the breach occurred, the exact time when the breach occurred and how long it is alleged that the vehicle was parked before the parking charge was allegedly incurred;
(e) The PoC do not state precisely how the sum claimed is calculated, including the basis for any statutory interest, damages, or other charges;
(f) The PoC do not state what proportion of the claim is the parking charge and what proportion is damages;
(g) The PoC do not provide clarity on whether the Defendant is sued as the driver or the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant cannot plead alternative causes of action without specificity.
4. The Defendant attaches to this defence a copy of a draft order approved by a district judge at another court. The court struck out the claim of its own initiative after determining that the Particulars of Claim failed to comply with CPR 16.4. The judge noted that the claimant had failed to:
(i) Set out the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions relied upon;
(ii) Adequately explain the reasons why the defendant was allegedly in breach of contract;
(iii) Provide separate, detailed Particulars of Claim as permitted under CPR PD 7C.5.2(2).
(iv) The court further observed that, given the modest sum claimed, requiring further case management steps would be disproportionate and contrary to the overriding objective. Accordingly, the judge struck out the claim outright rather than permitting an amendment.
5. The Defendant submits that the same reasoning applies in this case and invites the court to adopt a similar approach by striking out the claim for the Claimant’s failure to comply with CPR 16.4.
Statement of truth
I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
Signed:
Date:
Draft Order for the defence (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/tcewefk7daozuje25chkl/Strikeout-order-v2.pdf?rlkey=wxnymo8mwcma2jj8xihjm7pdx&st=nbtf0cn6&dl=0)
This can only be done in your uncle's name. You cannot do anything in your name on your uncles behalf. So, your uncle is the defendant.
If you follow the advice, there should not be any need for your uncle to have to go to court or anything as the claim will either be struck out of discontinued. In the extremely remote event that it ever did progress as far as a hearing (less than 1% chance), then he would have to be there but you could act as his lay representative.