For me this is a difficult one. It is obvious that there once was a bay there, but the council decided to put in a short length of double-yellow lines and to paint out the bay markings with black over-paint which has partly worn off.
This is the key point, the bay has partially reappeared so it's ambiguous. In Trudie Tinsley v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2210064678, 13 March 2021) (https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1AqJ7x3flIn5blwk_6Sw2czMd_k4U4P0X) adjudicator Belinda Pearce said:
The contemporaneous photographic capture was examined to evaluate the allegation in conjunction with the Appellant's representations.
The said vehicle is positioned within identifiable bay markings; one edge of the broken white bay demarcation being indented on the pavement clearly inducing motorists to position vehicles within such delineations and thereby parking with 2 wheels off the carriageway.
I find that the that the presence of the bay lines in the vicinity encourage such manner of parking and invite motorists to park off carriageway.
It is of concern that the Enforcement Authority state that the bay markings have 'been partially removed.'
Partial removal is unacceptable if the Enforcement Authority's intent is to remove the ability of motorists to so park.
Evidentially I do not find that the contravention occurred, accordingly I allow this Appeal.
I can't guarantee the outcome, but if you want to carry on I'm happy to represent you at the tribunal.