Free Traffic Legal Advice

Live cases legal advice => Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) => Topic started by: tommytbone on September 11, 2023, 12:29:52 pm

Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on March 27, 2024, 03:06:38 pm
Winner winner chicken dinner!!

@mrmustard was fantastic and persistent as he had to stick with it beyond the initial date. Huge thanks once again.

Also, thanks for your help too @cp8759 - really appreciate it.

The council still havent made the signs on this road visible though. Completely covered by the tree now. Useless, and so glad they haven't made money out of this one.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: mrmustard on March 26, 2024, 07:30:17 am
An appeal was started a while back. At the hearing I raised the fact of the Traffic Order not proving the alleged contravention and an adjournment was granted to allow the council to explain. They didn't explain and the map they then produced was for a different order. The outcome is below, case 2240017407

Mr Dishman represents the Appellant. The Authority was not represented.

Mr Dishman pointed out that the map tile provided by the Authority had an " effective date" of 5 June 2023 when the alleged contravention was supposed to have occurred on 23 May 2023.

I adjourned the matter for comments by the Authority. The Authority's response is that "There is no schedule attached as there is not on present on traffweb." I do not understand the comment.

The point is that the Authority must prove that a Traffic Management Order provides for the restriction as alleged in the penalty charge notice. A TMO may use map tiles to indicate such a restriction but the map tile submitted cannot serve this purpose because it was not in force at the time of the alleged contravention.

The Authority has re-submitted a map tile with the relevant date. I am not prepared to accept this. I have to determine the case on the way it was presented at the first hearing. The adjournment was to give the Authority the opportunity to challenge Mr Dishman's submissions. It was not to enable the Authority to correct an error.

I allow the appeal.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on January 09, 2024, 10:07:48 am
That would be fantastic and really appreciated @mrmustard. I'll email over now.
I want to thank you too @cp8759 - you've been superb!
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: mrmustard on January 03, 2024, 11:10:51 pm
Hi OP, CP8759 and I are both regular attenders at the tribunal (him by phone me in person as I live in London) and both win a good percentage of our cases, think 80-90%

Either of us will happily start and process the Appeal for you. If you want me please email an unredacted Notice of Rejection to mrmustard@zoho.com - it doesn't cost you a bean.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on January 03, 2024, 11:05:32 pm
I've never been at this stage before and wouldn't say I'm very clued up about it. Also aware that my initial appeal was pretty naive and it seems that the person who sent this rejection is focusing on what I put in it (that I looked at a sign across the road and presume it to be the same for my bay)

The road still has 1 sign out of 3 originally visible - 1 removed & 1 covered by trees.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on January 03, 2024, 01:32:43 pm
Notice of Rejection of Representation received today and i've attached their response. What do you think regarding making an appeal to the adjudicator?

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on December 29, 2023, 08:50:38 pm
Quick update on this,
I've had no response from the council yet, but just noticed that the charge amount has dropped back to £65 on the portal. Will keep my eye out for correspondence too
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 27, 2023, 07:36:10 pm
That's great. Thank you again for all your help here (and others contributing too). I'll get this sent off now
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on November 27, 2023, 06:29:47 pm
Should I include the new photo of the missing signage to support? and maybe resend covered one - maybe the council don't know about the missing sign as they don't seem to be maintaining other signs very well on this street
Yes you should send the photos, but not for the reasons you think: the council don't care about your photos, it's unlikely they'll actually look at them. The reason for including them is that at the tribunal stage, you can make the point to the adjudicator that you provided the photos and the council is just being obtuse.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: mrmustard on November 26, 2023, 08:58:29 pm
small edit, 'but' not 'by' after bay,
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 26, 2023, 07:42:42 pm
That's wonderful, huge thank you once again cp8759.

Should I include the new photo of the missing signage to support? and maybe resend covered one - maybe the council don't know about the missing sign as they don't seem to be maintaining other signs very well on this street
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on November 25, 2023, 04:56:52 pm
Here is a simple draft:

Dear London Borough of Waltham Forest,

Having now taken legal advice, I challenge liability on the basis that the authority has defaulted on its duties under regulation 18(1)(b) of The Local Authorities' Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996: there used to be three regulatory signs for this bay, but the one that would have been right behind my car has been removed, one was obscured by vegetation, and the only one that would have been visible was out of sight at the end of the road.

As there was no signage visible from where I parked my car, the alleged contravention did not occur. I would also point out that if the authority saw fit to provide three signs in the first place, it is under a legal obligation to maintain them.

In light of the above the alleged contravention did not occur.

Yours faithfully,


Send the representation online and keep a screenshot of the confirmation page. If the council issues a rejection, I'll sort out the tribunal appeal for you.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 24, 2023, 01:24:25 pm
But there are some who would think: you parked; you failed to make any attempt to look for an applicable traffic sign; it's your fault.
As far as I can work out, there are three applicable signs for the bay where he parked, one was missing (pending the photo I asked for), one was obscured by vegetation, and one was far away and out of sight.

A motorist who parks and gets out of his car is required to look for signs that are visible, he is not required to walk out of sight of his car (after all a CEO might come along and issue a PCN) nor is he required to look behind leaves, branches, bushes and so on.

If none of the signs were visible, the contravention did not occur. The fact that the motorist might have incorrectly relied on an irrelevant sign on the other side of the road would not alter that.

Thank you for laying this out as this is how I see it now and will continue to oppose this.
I respect your overview HC Anderson, and agree that my initial representation was misguided/naive, but ultimately I entered the road, looked around and the only sign to make sense of the parking restrictions was the one opposite. I made a mistake, but so did the council. I want their mistake to be acknowledged and/or have a financial cost, so will take it as far as possible.

I really appreciate both of your input here, so thank you
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 24, 2023, 01:14:24 pm
Can you go back and get us a picture showing this angle? https://maps.app.goo.gl/iQTY7Cgc8XR3Vx5n8

If you can, that would make the case open and shut.

Sorry for the delay in response but photos taken last night attached.



[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on November 19, 2023, 08:48:37 pm
But there are some who would think: you parked; you failed to make any attempt to look for an applicable traffic sign; it's your fault.
As far as I can work out, there are three applicable signs for the bay where he parked, one was missing (pending the photo I asked for), one was obscured by vegetation, and one was far away and out of sight.

A motorist who parks and gets out of his car is required to look for signs that are visible, he is not required to walk out of sight of his car (after all a CEO might come along and issue a PCN) nor is he required to look behind leaves, branches, bushes and so on.

If none of the signs were visible, the contravention did not occur. The fact that the motorist might have incorrectly relied on an irrelevant sign on the other side of the road would not alter that.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: H C Andersen on November 18, 2023, 11:56:00 am
There's fault on both sides here, yours and the council's, so if it got to adjudication based upon what is known and how it's been presented to date in your initial reps then IMO the outcome would not be open and shut.

You parked; you knew you were within a marked parking place and yet you did not look diligently for an applicable traffic sign but instead apparently looked across the road where a parking place had a Mon-Fri restriction and guessed/hoped/wished this applied to where you were parked.

Your initial reps included the following:

..on a 50m stretch of road there are 4 signs and 3 are mon-sat 10-4pm and one is Mon-fri 10-4pm (it was this one that I looked at as it was clearly visible 2 metres away from my car, albeit on the other side of the road. All signs in this area were mon-fri 10-4pm about 1-2 years ago, then changes started to occur. The street where this occurred is a small connecting road between two residential streets, I felt it was reasonable to assume all parking bays were consistent with each other.....??

'There are 4 signs' So why did you consult one which, as the holder of a driving licence, you are presumed to know did not apply to where you were parked? And when did the knowledge of 4 signs i.e. 3 within your bay, come to your attention? Your whole defence is based upon the invisibility of a sign, but if you have acknowledged knowing it was there before you parked, where does this leave your defence? I'm simply looking at what you've already submitted.

From the council's perspective, the CEO's traffic sign photo shows the one further from your car which implicitly accepts that the visibility of the nearer was compromised for their purposes, so why not for yours? And the fact it was the further as opposed to furthest is because there were only 2 in situ(not 3 as you stated in your reps) and GSV shows that a traffic sign had been displayed closer to your car in plain sight for some time and IMO as regards signs this should be your focus.
The third, middle, sign is a very recent addition because when the parking place was introduced in 2012 the council sited only 2 signs, one at either end. However, in 2020 the council decided to erect a third sign on a pre-existing column, paradoxically at a time when the overgrowth from the garden evergreen tree immediately behind - whose relentless march from within a garden to enveloping the footway can be seen in GSV - was guaranteed to obscure it. The sign behind your car has been in situ continuously since 2012 except for a short period in 2019, therefore the council, quite correctly, attach importance to its presence because it is the first one in the bay and alerts a driver to the restrictions. Its absence for a short period could perhaps be excused because there are 2 other signs, however, when the closer of these is itself obscured, in this case by a tree, this leaves only one sign potentially visible, nearly 40 metres away. The first sign was missing on the day...why has the council allowed this to be is a line of defence I would consider for formal reps hoping as a minimum to elicit a nonsense rejection which could swing an adjudicator to your side.

But there are some who would think: you parked; you failed to make any attempt to look for an applicable traffic sign; it's your fault.

Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: Incandescent on November 18, 2023, 12:51:35 am
Wasn't this sign https://maps.app.goo.gl/mMnZsKXjGkSeG4HY8 just behind where you parked? Is it still there?

No, it must have been removed. Here's a pic of the post taken from my car at the time. You can see the black post to the left as I enter the road
You can see a small unpainted part of the pole where the sign should be. Obviously the pole was painted after the sign was put up so they missed a bit.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on November 18, 2023, 12:43:12 am
Can you go back and get us a picture showing this angle? https://maps.app.goo.gl/iQTY7Cgc8XR3Vx5n8

If you can, that would make the case open and shut.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 14, 2023, 10:32:26 pm
That's really interesting though, as gmaps streetview is from april 2022 and the sign across from where I parked shows as mon-sat, but is now the only mon-fri one on the street. So within two years it's gone from mon-fri to mon-sat back to mon-fri.
They've also removed the one you spotted on the left hand side as you enter the road.
I also notice that the tree is covering the sign the year before too.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 14, 2023, 10:28:04 pm
Wasn't this sign https://maps.app.goo.gl/mMnZsKXjGkSeG4HY8 just behind where you parked? Is it still there?

No, it must have been removed. Here's a pic of the post taken from my car at the time. You can see the black post to the left as I enter the road

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on November 14, 2023, 10:21:42 pm
Wasn't this sign https://maps.app.goo.gl/mMnZsKXjGkSeG4HY8 just behind where you parked? Is it still there?
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 12, 2023, 08:47:53 pm
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone has any suggestions for my representation since receiving the new NTO? Be a big help if so!
Thanks
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 07, 2023, 10:08:04 am
Frustratingly, I can’t find my saved document for this representation, so I’ve tried to recreate what I sent below. I’ll add pictures I added to the appeal too + one annotated to represent where i parked and where the covered sign was, you can also see the visible sign across the street that i wrongly followed. I hope this helps your guidance and again, let me thank you for your support here.

I referenced the below parts of the traffic act in some sort of similar wording below, whilst referencing the specifics of this incident.
Inadequate Signage Visibility: According to the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, it is a legal requirement that parking signage is clearly visible and provides motorists with sufficient notice of parking restrictions. Upon entering the location, I could not identify any clear and conspicuous signage indicating the parking restrictions or the requirement to display a valid parking permit. The signage in question was either absent, obscured, or placed in a manner that made it virtually impossible for any reasonable driver to notice and comprehend the parking regulations in effect.

Non-Compliance with Regulatory Standards: The Department for Transport's Traffic Signs Manual stipulates clear guidelines for parking signage, ensuring that they meet specific standards in terms of visibility, positioning, and legibility. It is my contention that the signage at the location in question fails to meet these standards, as it did not provide clear, visible, and unambiguous information about the parking restrictions. This lack of compliance with the regulatory standards raises concerns about the validity of the PCN.

I also described how the changing nature of the local parking restrictions have made it very difficult to understand the rules. As on a 50m stretch of road there are 4 signs and 3 are mon-sat 10-4pm and one is Mon-fri 10-4pm (it was this one that I looked at as it was clearly visible 2 metres away from my car, albeit on the other side of the road. All signs in this area were mon-fri 10-4pm about 1-2 years ago, then changes started to occur. The street where this occurred is a small connecting road between two residential streets, I felt it was reasonable to assume all parking bays were consistent with each other and as the other closest sign for my side was complete blocked by trees, and as the next one was about 150ft away, and unvisable from my parking location, I made this assumption.

As a side to my representation, I sent a information request to enquire when the signs were last checked for visibility. They responded it was earlier that year and it was felt that they met standards. As of today 6 months later, the sign is now even more covered by overgrown branches, so continued disregard for responsibility.



[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 07, 2023, 09:41:39 am
Thanks alot CP,

Here's the NTO now received and i'll recreate the original representation as best i can in the next post.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on November 01, 2023, 11:42:07 pm
Bugger I don't have that. Or pretty sure I don't. It was destroyed by my toddler. I'll check if I took pictures of it, but will this hold me back significantly?
It's not essential but it would be handy if we could see it.

Also what did you say in your original representation? If you don't have a copy, just recreate it from memory as best you can.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 01, 2023, 10:56:56 pm
Thank you everyone for your responses and insight. The Letter wasn't that clear to my layman eyes, so good to know things are moving in the right direction. Was just expecting to see a change on the PCN council page, not a letter.

Please post up both sides of the original PCN, the one they attached to the car.

Bugger I don't have that. Or pretty sure I don't. It was destroyed by my toddler. I'll check if I took pictures of it, but will this hold me back significantly?
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on November 01, 2023, 10:53:11 pm
Please post up both sides of the original PCN, the one they attached to the car.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on November 01, 2023, 11:08:35 am
The PCN is sat at £195 at the moment, keep an eye on https://walthamocm.itsvc.co.uk/PCN/ and as soon as it goes up to £204, you can download form TE9 (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1094491/Parking_TE9.pdf), fill it in (remember the applicant is the council, not you) and tick the box to say you never got the NTO, then email it to tec@justice.gov.uk with the PCN number in the subject line.

When the amount due on the council website drops back down to £130, it means the Notice to Owner has been reissued. Let us know when this happens (you'll need to check once every 10 days or so after you've emailed TEC) and we'll help with a representation.

Any questions please ask.

Cost has just dropped down to £130 on the councils website. I'll keep my eye out for the new NTO, but just letting you know for for any support you can offer on representation. Huge thanks in advance to all of you helping here.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on October 28, 2023, 03:14:15 pm
Thank you everyone for your responses and insight. The Letter wasn't that clear to my layman eyes, so good to know things are moving in the right direction. Was just expecting to see a change on the PCN council page, not a letter.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: slapdash on October 26, 2023, 06:19:10 pm
You might want to redact your name.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: Pastmybest on October 26, 2023, 03:27:08 pm
Council have 28 days beginning with the date the CC was revoked to serve a fresh NTO  or you will win by default
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: John U.K. on October 26, 2023, 03:09:54 pm
Not Crown Court - it's from the TEC- a dedicated county court for traffic enforcement.
It means what it says on the tin - PCN not cancelled, Charge certificate is cancelled, you may wish to contact council, council should contacty you for next steps.
See what the experts here advise.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on October 26, 2023, 02:05:42 pm
Just received the attached letter from the crown court. Confused what it means or what stage I'm at.
Any thoughts?
Thanks
Tom

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on October 11, 2023, 10:27:49 pm
Use this one: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1094491/Parking_TE9.pdf
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on October 10, 2023, 11:54:40 am
The PCN is sat at £195 at the moment, keep an eye on https://walthamocm.itsvc.co.uk/PCN/ and as soon as it goes up to £204, you can download form TE9 (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1094509/TE9.pdf), fill it in (remember the applicant is the council, not you) and tick the box to say you never got the NTO, then email it to tec@justice.gov.uk with the PCN number in the subject line.

When the amount due on the council website drops back down to £130, it means the Notice to Owner has been reissued. Let us know when this happens (you'll need to check once every 10 days or so after you've emailed TEC) and we'll help with a representation.

Any questions please ask.

Hi cp8759, I'm just filling out the electronic TE9 form and noticed that the reason for witness statement doesn't mention NTO... it says "I did not receive the penalty charge notice" whereas the paper version I received in the post says "I did not receive the Notice to owner/penalty charge notice"
I'd prefer to use the online version, but wondered if it will be understood by clicking this reason.

Thanks
Tom
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on September 19, 2023, 08:13:10 pm
Received the attached from the council. 

Looks like it'll advance in two weeks. Will keep my eye on it and report back. Thanks

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on September 12, 2023, 04:11:36 pm
I thought so too, but really reassuring to hear from yourself too. I'll come back once it's moved along as advised above.
Thanks for your input too!
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: Pastmybest on September 12, 2023, 09:54:17 am
Once this is reset there are loads of reasons to challenge
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on September 12, 2023, 07:06:34 am
That's superb! Thank you wizard cp8759. I really appreciate your guidance
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on September 12, 2023, 12:20:38 am
The PCN is sat at £195 at the moment, keep an eye on https://walthamocm.itsvc.co.uk/PCN/ and as soon as it goes up to £204, you can download form TE9 (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1094491/Parking_TE9.pdf), fill it in (remember the applicant is the council, not you) and tick the box to say you never got the NTO, then email it to tec@justice.gov.uk with the PCN number in the subject line.

When the amount due on the council website drops back down to £130, it means the Notice to Owner has been reissued. Let us know when this happens (you'll need to check once every 10 days or so after you've emailed TEC) and we'll help with a representation.

Any questions please ask.
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on September 11, 2023, 10:45:40 pm
Thanks so much for your reply and I will give that page a read as suggested.

Oh, I thought I'd added those details, here they are.
Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) Number: FR59597524 Vehicle Registration Number: PY60KGA

Thanks once again for any help you can offer
Title: Re: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: cp8759 on September 11, 2023, 10:37:12 pm
So the NTO was lost in the post, these things happen. Don't worry about it, it can be dealt with and is quite straightforward.

Go to this page https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/eat/understanding-enforcement-process/parking-penalty-charge-notice-enforcement-process#rod and read the Registration of Debt and Order for Recovery and Witness Statement paragraphs.

It will be much easier for us to help you if you give us the PCN number and the number plate.
Title: Waltham Forest - 12w Parked in a residents space - York Road E10 - Covered sign
Post by: tommytbone on September 11, 2023, 12:29:52 pm
Hi all, hope you can advise on this... First time I've wanted to take a PCN to tribunals, so i think i may have made a big error of the process here:

Context:
Got a ticket on a short residential street behind Leyton main road. I have an office local, and these streets look to have been having a number of changes to the parking rules the past couple of months/previous year.
It was residential mon-fri 9-4pm, then changed to mon-sat 9-4pm, and now they seem to be a mix between the two, even on the same short road. York Rd is a short connecting road between two residential streets, and it has four marked areas to park. In the past they were all mon-fri... Now it seems only one is and the one I was in is mon-sat. I got a ticket on a sat as the side I was on was Mon-Sat (i've included a location link to where i parked - where shopping trolly is). £65 (14day discount) £130 total.

The closest sign for my bay is heavily covered by completely blocked by trees (still is 4 months later) and the sign bright as day across from my car (but other side of road) said mon-fri, and given my history of parking in the area, and i had my 18m old screaming), I parked there. Got a ticket and appealled under "Inadequate Signage Visibility" but was rejected as theres another sign much further down the road that i 'should have looked at' - something I couldn't see from where I parked.

In that rejection letter they said:
""If you wish to take the matter further a Notice to Owner (NtO) will be sent to the registered
keeper of the vehicle in 28 days if no payment is made, you can then make a Formal
Representation after you receive this, I must advise you that at this stage the PCN will be at
the full charge."

... so I read this as wait 28 days and another letter will come and then you can escalate to the courts. I waited without paying.
However, last week I received a Charge Certificate stating that an additional charge has been added to the £130 - now £195.

I emailed saying I never received the NtO as per there letter, and their response was that they have sent this debt to Northampton debt collection. I wonder what I have done wrong here, I want to fight this original PCN but seems i'm with the debt collection company now.

It become very stressful and wondering what the hell is going on to be honest.
The missus says i should have just paid the £65 - i'm starting to agree with her.

I've added all the pics from the day of the area - and the letters I've received. First time posting and tried to navigate the rules, but let me know if i've missed anything.

Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) Number: FR59597524
Vehicle Registration Number: PY60KGA

PCN letter: https://photos.app.goo.gl/G3wpU9MuEaXEaF3n9
Back of letter: https://photos.app.goo.gl/NPQrewEq9hNDT9ee8
Charge Certificate: https://photos.app.goo.gl/owc2oPvTPJfghERM7
Where i parked: https://photos.app.goo.gl/qdgW5oEuX1URqrxa9
                        https://photos.app.goo.gl/AJGuztpiNHFuivzZ6
Sign across the street: https://photos.app.goo.gl/AJGuztpiNHFuivzZ6


Location: https://goo.gl/maps/kxwA2R3c9FasZajy6