You don’t sign a formal letter “Best regards”. You should point out there is a big difference between a fine and a PCN, which is simply a speculative invoice from an unregulated parking company.
Here is a slightly adjusted version you can use or adapt:
Subject: Formal Complaint – Unauthorised Payment of a Private Parking Charge
Dear Tesla Customer Support,
I am writing to formally dispute Tesla’s unauthorised payment of a private parking charge notice (PCN) on my behalf without prior notification or consent. This action has deprived me of the opportunity to appeal the charge and has resulted in an unfair financial loss.
At the outset, I must stress that a PCN is not a fine. It is a speculative invoice issued by an unregulated private parking company, and it has no statutory authority. By paying this charge outright, Tesla has effectively accepted liability on my behalf without my authorisation, which is wholly unacceptable.
Grounds for Dispute
1. No Authorisation to Pay PCNs on My Behalf
Clause 3.8 of the lease agreement states that I, as the hirer, am responsible for paying fines. However, a private parking charge is not a fine. Nowhere in the agreement does it grant Tesla the authority to pay speculative invoices from private parking operators without first informing me or obtaining my consent.
2. Failure to Transfer Liability
Instead of paying the PCN outright, Tesla should have followed the standard industry practice of nominating me as the hirer, thereby allowing me to appeal or dispute the charge if necessary. Tesla’s failure to follow due process has denied me this right and caused financial detriment.
3. Breach of Consumer Rights Act 2015 – Failure to Provide Services as Described
If Tesla asserts the right to unilaterally pay PCNs without prior consent, this constitutes a fundamental change to the contract that was neither disclosed nor agreed upon. This practice is in breach of Section 50 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which mandates that services must be provided as described.
4. Unjust Enrichment Through Administration Fee
By paying the PCN without my consent and subsequently adding an administration fee of £10, Tesla has imposed an unfair and unjustifiable charge for a service I neither requested nor agreed to. This constitutes unjust enrichment, as Tesla has financially benefited from an action that has caused me financial loss.
Action Taken & Future Expectations
As Tesla’s unilateral payment of the PCN was both unauthorised and unfair, I have cancelled my direct debit to prevent further unauthorised deductions.
I will reinstate payments via standing order, ensuring my lease fees are paid in full while preventing Tesla from imposing additional unauthorised charges.
Request to Switch to Standing Order for Lease Payments
Please confirm the following:
• The correct bank details and payment reference to use for my monthly payments.
• That no penalties or late fees will be applied due to this payment method change, as payments will continue to be made on time.
Resolution Required
I expect Tesla to:
• Fully refund the PCN amount and the unjust administration fee.
• Confirm in writing that Tesla will not make unauthorised payments for PCNs in the future.
This matter is urgent, and I expect a formal response within 7 days. If I do not receive a satisfactory resolution, I will escalate this complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service and explore legal action under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
I look forward to your prompt response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
[Your Contact Details]
[Your Lease Reference Number]
Your only recourse is to sue the lease company, Tesla, under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
This is no longer a private parking charge issue. Your issue is with Tesla.
As the Hirer you can argue the following points in a formal complaint before a Letter of Claim (LoC) to Tesla:
1. Breach of Contract – Unfair Terms (Consumer Rights Act 2015, Section 62 & Schedule 2)
• Tesla’s unilateral payment of the PCN without consulting the Hirer is unfair.
• Any term allowing Tesla to do this without giving the Hirer a chance to appeal is likely unfair and unenforceable.
2. Failure to Exercise Reasonable Care and Skill (Consumer Rights Act 2015, Section 49)
[/indent]• Tesla should have transferred liability to the Hirer rather than paying outright.
• Failing to do so deprived the Hirer of their right to challenge the charge.[/indent]
3. Unjust Enrichment
• By charging an admin fee on top of the PCN, Tesla profited from an act that financially harmed the Hirer without justification.
• This amounts to unjust enrichment, and the Hirer is entitled to a refund.
4. Failure to Provide Services as Described (Consumer Rights Act 2015, Section 50)
• If the lease agreement did not clearly state that Tesla would pay PCNs rather than transfer liability, then their actions are a breach of contract.
5. Demand a Refund
• The Hirer demands a full refund of the PCN charge and admin fee.
• Future PCNs should be transferred to the Hirer, not paid by Tesla, unless explicitly authorised.