Free Traffic Legal Advice
Live cases legal advice => Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) => Topic started by: Carpytarper on January 10, 2025, 09:24:08 pm
-
+1. and the letter as in Simply recieved the dvd evidence with a letter stating to call if any questions and then was expecting to receive further correspondence of the next steps
-
Dont block out the dates
-
We really need to see the PCN or at least know its date, the contravention date, and the location.
Sorry, but no documents or any other useful information means we are totally in the dark here.
-
post the video
-
Thankyou
It’s a friend of mine
We cannot locate the appeal send but was along the lines of
Please provide evidence showing a contravention has occurred as it is not clear from the photos graphs provided and do not feel this contravention occurred
Simply recieved the dvd evidence with a letter stating to call if any questions and then was expecting to receive further correspondence of the next steps
-
Is this "someone" you or not ? trying to give advice to a third party with no solid information is difficult, so please read this and update your thread accordingly. We especially need to see what was submitted to TfL.
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/
-
Can someone please advise
I know that someone has received a charge for stopping in yellow hatchings. An appeal was made to provide further evidence within the 14 day discount period, evidence was then provided with no explanation and on the website no further updates were made other than stating the the representation submitted was under review and on Hold sus20 enquiry recieved. Then charge certificate was batched and the amount has increased to £240. Having then called it was explained that they did not consider the representation as a representation but took the persons comments into consideration and placed it back on hold. Then further letter was recieved stating that the sum still stands and the representation was never considered as a representation
surely this isn’t right and they should have responded to the person to state this and given them the opportunity to pay the origional fine at the discounted rate? Now there is no opportunity to appeal and only option now is to make a statutory declaration to TEC.
of anyone can advise here, the person is willing to pay the origional fine but seems completely unfair that they were never updated on the website that representation was not accepted or considered a representation
please help
[attachment deleted by admin]