Just had this from TFL:
The camera located outside 121 Stoke Newington Road is a TfL Streets CCTV Camera No. 04/011417.
This is a Bosch Security MIC IP Starlight 7100i camera.
I don't believe TFL have a certificate for this particular model of camera, if the camera isn't approved by the Secretary of State then there is no power to serve a postal PCN. Therefore service of the PCN is a procedural impropriety.
That is good to know, is there somewhere i can refer to this info as evidence as i have Received the Notice of Reject today !
(https://i.imgur.com/zTw1CZu.jpeg)
(https://i.imgur.com/cTSsZ4A.jpeg)
(https://i.imgur.com/tLWSz0i.jpeg)
Just had this from TFL:
The camera located outside 121 Stoke Newington Road is a TfL Streets CCTV Camera No. 04/011417.
This is a Bosch Security MIC IP Starlight 7100i camera.
I don't believe TFL have a certificate for this particular model of camera, if the camera isn't approved by the Secretary of State then there is no power to serve a postal PCN. Therefore service of the PCN is a procedural impropriety.
So there's a few interesting points here. The traffic order is The GLA Roads and GLA Side Roads (Hackney) Red Route Consolidation Traffic Order 2007 (https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1nKIasnoMqHziJSAr2N9ClJfbAK76Wwbg) and the relevant entry is number 183 on page 33:
WALFORD ROAD, the north side from the extended southern building line of No. 121 P.H. Stoke Newington Road to a point 13 metres west of the extended eastern building line of No. 121 P.H. Stoke Newington Road
It is certainly arguable that the traffic order does not prohibit stopping where the vehicle stopped:
(https://i.imgur.com/slLES17.png)
It would turn on whether the "extended eastern building line" includes the extension that's been added to the eastern end of the building. However even if we include that, the road markings are wrong, though not as much:
(https://i.imgur.com/4B5J1Q6.png)
It's unfortunate you didn't park on the other side of the road, as The GLA Side Roads (London Borough of Hackney) Designation Order 2007 (https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ijMIBsqTPxhd2Wwdbbrd29_JxQKQXQGZ) suggests that the southern side isn't a GLA side road at all, see page 24.
Anyway, the other issue that could win the day is the question of camera approval, as happened yesterday in Anish Raj Shrestha v Transport for London (2230256263, 26 August 2023) (https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1dFUa8HEcUh2HyuDprMyvoP1NZ67kMZWA), I have therefore requested details of the make and model of the CCTV camera.
For now I would urgently make a representation simply denying the contravention, otherwise TFL might simply claim that you didn't make representations within the 28 day period (which expired months ago as far as I can see), I know they say the PCN is put on hold when you request the DVD but whether they honour that can be a bit hit and miss.
It would be helpful if you could give us the PCN number and number plate so that we can check the online status of the penalty.