@mashhd well there's bad news and some good news.
The bad news is that you're banged-to-rights on the contravention:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81HA0r_bR8U
If this had been caught on dashcam and reported to the police by a member of the public, you could have ended up with three points on your licence for driving without due care and attention.
The goods news is that the council website does not provide the statutory grounds of appeal:
(https://i.imgur.com/3sAcSPa.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/An6Rvgt.png)
This has been upheld as a ground of appeal by almost every adjudicator in the tribunal, the most recent Brent cases is Muhammadmaisam Datoo v London Borough of Brent (2240196951, 29 July 2024) (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X8WGsVS-DSfY_ndf6VsbOTKUYO880bQG/view) but if you look here (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pVrE76_RYY6bNmEpYGbsZkxtpfIeud_BT3SKfg7TzQM/edit?gid=642784037#gid=642784037&range=A644), there's a whole raft of cases all won on the same point in rows 644 to 647 (I won another one against Islington this morning that I'll add to the spreadsheet tomorrow).
The council will never accept anything you say, so you'll have to make a representation as follows:
Dear London Borough of Brent,
I challenge liability on the ground that the penalty charge exceeds the amount due in the circumstances of the case.
Yours faithfully
The council will issue a notice of rejection, but you have overwhelmingly good odds of winning the subsequent appeal to the tribunal. Make the representation online and keep a screenshot of the confirmation page.