If the WS and bundle deadline was 8th October, why have you waited until now to let us know? Not being copied in on the claimants WS is a serious matter and is considered unreasonable behaviour.
However, it will be worth your while contacting the court asap to check that they have not discontinued and failed to notify you. Ask if the claimant has paid the trial fee.
If they have paid and the hearing is still scheduled, it’s too late now to tr and email the court. You will have to raise this as a preliminary matter in the hearing.
At the start of the hearing, ask to address a procedural matter regarding the claimant's compliance with court orders. State that the claimant has failed to provide you with a copy of their witness statement, despite the court’s order that it be filed and served at 8th October.
Emphasise that the claimant’s failure to serve their witness statement has disadvantaged you, as you have not had the opportunity to review or respond to their evidence. Make it clear that you are attending the hearing without having seen the claimant’s case in full.
Politely request that the judge considers a sanction for this non-compliance. You should request the following, explaining each briefly:
1. Exclusion of the Claimant’s Witness Statement and Evidence: Ask the judge to exclude the claimant’s witness statement and any evidence they attempt to introduce, as this would otherwise put you at an unfair disadvantage.
2. Strike Out of the Claim: Request that the claim be struck out entirely under CPR 3.4 for failure to comply with court orders.
3. Costs Order: Request that the judge considers a costs order against the claimant for their unreasonable conduct, which has resulted in additional inconvenience and time spent preparing for the hearing without the benefit of seeing their evidence.
4. Offer to Proceed or Adjourn (as Appropriate): If the judge decides not to exclude the evidence or strike out the claim, you could request an adjournment to allow time to review the claimant’s statement should they file it. Alternatively, if you prefer to proceed, make it clear that you are willing to continue based on the available information but wish to preserve your rights to object due to the lack of notice.
Let us know the outcome please.
Here is a suggested versi9n for your WS which includes the information about the difference in name:
In the County Court at Nottingham
Claim Number: [xxxxxx]
Vehicle Control Services Limited
Claimant
- and -
[Maiden Name]
Defendant
Witness Statement of [Married Name]
1. I, [Married Name], formerly known as [Maiden Name], of [your address], make this statement as the defendant in response to the claim brought by Vehicle Control Services Ltd (VCS).
Background
2. On 27/06/2023, I received a letter from Volkswagen Financial Services (VWFS), notifying me that they had received a Charge Notice (CN) and a Notice to Keeper (NTK) from Vehicle Control Services Ltd (VCS) regarding an alleged breach of contract by a vehicle with registration number [xxxx xxx] at 13:54 on 26/06/2023 at East Midlands Airport (EMA). I refer to the letter from VWFS, marked AW01. The letter further stated that VWFS had transferred liability for the alleged breach of contract to me as the Hirer of the vehicle in question.
Non-compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (POFA)
3. The claimant, VCS, did not comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (POFA), particularly regarding the issuing of a Notice to Hirer (NtH). Specifically, they have failed to provide the necessary documents as required by paragraphs 13 and 14 of Schedule 4. However, even if the necessary documents had been provided, POFA does not apply in this case because East Midlands Airport (EMA) is land subject to statutory control and governed by bye-laws. Therefore, under the law, VCS cannot hold me liable as the Hirer of the vehicle for the Charge Notice.
4. Furthermore, I wish to clarify that I was neither the driver nor the registered keeper of the vehicle in question at the time of the alleged breach. The burden of proof rests on the claimant to establish who was driving the vehicle, and the claimant has failed to provide any evidence to support their mendacious assertion that I was either the driver or the keeper.
I Was Not the Driver on the Date of the Alleged Breach
5. On the date and time of the alleged breach of contract (26/06/2023, 13:54), I was returning to EMA from Naples Airport, Italy. My flight was scheduled to land at 12:55 pm, but it was delayed. At 13:54, I was still going through passport control at EMA, and I can confirm that I was not driving the vehicle in question. I refer to my flight confirmation, marked AW03.
Deficiencies in the Claimant’s Particulars of Claim (PoC)
6. The Claimant's PoC states that I breached terms and conditions on “private land,” but as previously noted, EMA is land subject to statutory control and does not qualify as “private land” for the purposes of POFA.
7. I also draw the Court’s attention to the fact that the PoC is in breach of Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) 16.4, 16PD3, and 16PD7, as it fails to "state all facts necessary for the purpose of formulating a complete cause of action." A copy of the PoC is attached and marked AW04.
8. The PoC further state that the defendant is being pursued for a “breach of contract” and that “the sign” was the “offer,” while “driving onto the land” was the “acceptance.” However, the PoC fail to mention the third essential element to form a contract, the “consideration.” As the signs are prohibitive in nature, there can be no consideration, and therefore no contract could have been formed.
9. Additionally, the PoC claim that "at all material times, the defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver." This statement is factually incorrect, and I invite the Court to note that it has been signed with a Statement of Truth, despite the lack of accuracy.
No Contract Formed & Breach of the Consumer Rights Act (CRA)
10. Even if the Court were to consider the possibility of a contract being formed, such a contract would be unfair and unenforceable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA). The CRA prohibits unfair terms in consumer contracts, and any term that attempts to impose liability on the Hirer when the land is subject to statutory control would be considered an unfair term.
11. Further, the terms outlined on the signage at EMA are prohibitive in nature, forbidding certain actions rather than offering anything in exchange. For a valid contract to exist, there must be an exchange of consideration, which is absent here. The signage merely imposes restrictions rather than offering parking services in return for payment. As such, no contract could have been validly formed between the Claimant and myself.
Conclusion
12. In conclusion, the Claimant's claim is unfounded for the reasons outlined above. They have failed to comply with POFA, there is no evidence to support the claim that I was the driver, no contract was formed, and their PoC are deficient. I respectfully request the Court to dismiss the claim in its entirety.
13. In the matter of costs, I ask:
(a) standard witness costs for attendance at Court, pursuant to CPR 27.14, and
(b) for a finding of unreasonable conduct by this Claimant, seeking costs pursuant to CPR 46.5.
14. Attention is drawn specifically to the (often-seen from this industry) possibility of an unreasonably late Notice of Discontinuance. Whilst CPR r.38.6 states that the Claimant is liable for the Defendant's costs after discontinuance (r.38.6(1)), this does not normally apply to claims allocated to the small claims track (r.38.6(3)). However, the White Book states (annotation 38.6.1): "Note that the normal rule as to costs does not apply if a claimant in a case allocated to the small claims track serves a notice of discontinuance although it might be contended that costs should be awarded if a party has behaved unreasonably (r.27.14(2)(dg))."
Statement of Truth
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
Signed: [Your Married Name]
Date: [Insert Date]
Do not rush to submit your WS. You should, if at all possible leave it to the last minute or not before the claimant submits theirs which you can then rebut in your own WS.
The above is a started for now.