It hardly matters what the video shows, here's what you should sent:
Dear Transport for London,
I challenge liability on the basis of a procedural impropriety, I refer you to the panel decision in Commercial Plant Services Ltd and others v Transport for London (2230060716, 25 May 2023) which was recently upheld on review before the chief adjudicator.
Yours faithfully,
Your chances of success are virtually 100%, as TFL have lost every single appeal since the panel decision in May. If you want to read up on it, see https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/sites/default/files/keycases/Red%20Route%20Panel%20Decision.pdf and the review at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MuUHGsMkemuPt6esWEcWyTHmCzG47ssT/view?usp=sharing
Hello,
Thank you all for your input and you, especially @Incandescent
I did exactly as you suggested and sent them over my representation word in word-as you indicated me to do so.
After almost a month I received this in my email inbox.
A letter of rejection of my representation.
in summary:
This is a Notice of Rejection from Transport for London (TfL) in response to a representation received regarding a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN).
The recipient had challenged the PCN on the grounds of a procedural impropriety, referencing a recent judgment related to red route PCNs.
TfL disagreed with the recipient's argument, stating that they believe the PCN is valid and that there has been no procedural impropriety.
The PCN was issued because the recipient's vehicle was observed stationary in a red route loading bay outside the permitted times,
which constitutes a contravention. TfL emphasized that it is the driver's responsibility to be aware of and comply with red route restrictions,
as indicated by statutory signs and road markings.
TfL has considered the representation but has decided not to cancel the PCN, as they do not believe the mitigating factors presented are sufficient.
The recipient is instructed to make payment for the outstanding Penalty Charge Notices, with different payment deadlines for discounted and full amounts.
Additionally, the letter informs the recipient of their right to appeal to an Environment and Traffic Adjudicator at London Tribunals
within 28 days of the letter's service. The letter provides information on how to appeal and warns of the possibility of costs being
awarded against either party if the appeal is deemed unreasonable. Failure to pay or appeal within the specified timeframe may result in additional charges and legal action.
Payment options are provided, including online, via a mobile app, or by post, with clear instructions on how to make payments.
The letter includes the PCN number and the outstanding balance of £80.00.
A full copy of this letter can be found in the attachment.
Is there any viable way out of this but going full ballistic with TFL?
Thank you all again for your ongoing help and support.
Juliya.
[attachment deleted by admin]
It hardly matters what the video shows, here's what you should sent:
Dear Transport for London,
I challenge liability on the basis of a procedural impropriety, I refer you to the panel decision in Commercial Plant Services Ltd and others v Transport for London (2230060716, 25 May 2023) which was recently upheld on review before the chief adjudicator.
Yours faithfully,
Your chances of success are virtually 100%, as TFL have lost every single appeal since the panel decision in May. If you want to read up on it, see https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/sites/default/files/keycases/Red%20Route%20Panel%20Decision.pdf and the review at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MuUHGsMkemuPt6esWEcWyTHmCzG47ssT/view?usp=sharing