@cp8759 I assume the decisions referred to are in the list?Yes.
Hence my signature details. Best to be proactive.When there are totally, even wildly different adjudications, for identical circumstances, something is obviously wrong.Pretty poor adjudicator logic. Has this adjudicator not heard of the well-established principle of de minimis ? It seems not. Useless as an adjudicator IMHO, there is clear bias shown. Apparently an authority can now put what they like on their web pages provided the statutory grounds are on the PCN. Tosh !@cp8759 @Incandescent An argument for a panel decision? I have recently uploaded their very same page in Case No 2240415738 for a member and they have DNCed yesterday. Another is looming so let's see what happens.
I liken it all to a game of Scrabble.
When there are totally, even wildly different adjudications, for identical circumstances, something is obviously wrong.Pretty poor adjudicator logic. Has this adjudicator not heard of the well-established principle of de minimis ? It seems not. Useless as an adjudicator IMHO, there is clear bias shown. Apparently an authority can now put what they like on their web pages provided the statutory grounds are on the PCN. Tosh !@cp8759 @Incandescent An argument for a panel decision? I have recently uploaded their very same page in Case No 2240415738 for a member and they have DNCed yesterday. Another is looming so let's see what happens.
I liken it all to a game of Scrabble.
Pretty poor adjudicator logic. Has this adjudicator not heard of the well-established principle of de minimis ? It seems not. Useless as an adjudicator IMHO, there is clear bias shown. Apparently an authority can now put what they like on their web pages provided the statutory grounds are on the PCN. Tosh !@cp8759 @Incandescent An argument for a panel decision? I have recently uploaded their very same page in Case No 2240415738 for a member and they have DNCed yesterday. Another is looming so let's see what happens.
> Please: your formal reps.[/i]
Is that a request from me? I.e what was my formal representation?
Make a representation today explaining what you've explained to us, i.e. you realised your mistake and turned around. They will likely reject but the discount will be extended and this will buy us several weeks to find better arguments.
What counts as a mitigation?Recent bereavements, health issues, family issues, financial difficulties, anything like that.
You don't need to pay at this stage, even if you just put in a representation saying "the contravention did not occur" that will get the discount extended, but we can probably come up with something better than that.
What counts as a mitigation?Recent bereavements, health issues, family issues, financial difficulties, anything like that.
No mitigation, at least none of those on the presentations list on the back of the PCN.Forget about what's on the back of the PCN, do you have anything else?
No mitigation, at least none of those on the presentations list on the back of the PCN.Forget about what's on the back of the PCN, do you have anything else?
Please upload the PCN, also do you have any mitigation unconnected to the contravention itself?
No mitigation, at least none of those on the presentations list on the back of the PCN.
(https://i.imgur.com/9J5CvJ6.jpeg)
(https://i.imgur.com/m3DhH77.jpeg)
Unable to attach screenshot of the PCN to this message. I keep getting a "The upload folder is full. Please try a smaller file and/or contact an administrator."That's because you need to read the guidance here (https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/), which tells you how to upload images correctly.
PCN Nummber: ZN1293681A
Car reg: GD15WKY
Evidence site with video: link (https://haringey.tarantoportal.com/PCNs)