I've started drafting an appeal, which I’ll follow up with, along with the redacted PCN document.
It’d be great to hear any thoughts on the above, and whether you agree or if I’m barking up the wrong tree.
As above, please tell us that is your draft and you haven't sent it yet. It is full off incorrect information which will alert the PPC that they are dealing with someone who doesn't know what they are on about and only encourage them to push on with this.
You did not receive a Penalty Charge Notice which is very different from a Parking Charge Notice, which is what you received and has nothing to do with the Traffic Management Act 2004 nor the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007 (which is revoked).
If you are going to research, then you should be studying the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/schedule/4/enacted) and the IPC Code of Practice v9 (https://irp.cdn-website.com/262226a6/files/uploaded/IPC%20Code%20of%20PracticeV9%20V4.pdf)
Hopefully, you haven't sent that appeal yet. Not that it will make much of a difference overall as I have already explained earlier. This is likely to go all the way to court if it ever gets that far.
If you want to send an appeal that shows you are not low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree, ripe for picking then send this:
This is an appeal by the registered keeper - No driver details will be given. Please do NOT try the trick of asking for driver details in order to get around the fact your NtK does not comply with PoFA. Your NtK was sent more than 56 days after the NtD was affixed to the vehicle and you have therefore failed to fully comply with the strict requirements of PoFA section 8(4)(b) and 8(5) in order to hold myself, the keeper, liable for the charge.
As there is no keeper liability, therefore, liability cannot flow from the driver to the keeper. The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your PCN can only hold the driver liable. So you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN and remove my personal information from your database.
Should you and/or and the IAS kangaroo court fail to cancel the PCN, you are put on notice that any continued attempt after receipt of this appeal to demand moneys from myself, the registered keeper, will be considered harassment, as you know full well that I cannot be liable for the charge. Please bear this fact in mind should you decide to try and progress this all the way to court.