Free Traffic Legal Advice

General discussion => The Flame Pit => Topic started by: Hippocrates on June 25, 2024, 08:29:04 am

Title: Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
Post by: cp8759 on June 27, 2024, 11:24:46 pm
Quote from: H C Andersen on June 27, 2024, 08:32:52 am
Can't get beyond 573 :-\

Not sure what you mean? Can you share a screenshot or a screen recording?
Title: Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
Post by: H C Andersen on June 27, 2024, 08:32:52 am
Can't get beyond 573 :-\

And I'm reminded of situations which still crop up, although less frequently, which is when an authority includes the actual 14 and 28-day dates in reg. 9 PCNs. Although there were some successes on this point early in the piece, as I recall the consensus view now between the two tribunals is that provided the statutory words or meaning are clearly stated then no PI exists, and this is when 'incorrect' info is actually included in a PCN.
Title: Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
Post by: cp8759 on June 26, 2024, 08:08:12 pm
@Hippocrates moved this to the flame pit.

Also please note row numbers on the spreadsheet cannot be relied upon, for the simple reason that I keep adding cases all the time so stuff will shift about.
Title: Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
Post by: Hippocrates on June 25, 2024, 12:49:43 pm
https://bit.ly/2ALghSS

Adjudications key cases  586 ff especially 601
Title: Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
Post by: H C Andersen on June 25, 2024, 10:24:09 am
How would these errors, which do not stand alone but simply conflict with what RKs etc. have already been formally and procedurally notified about, avail them at adjudication especially if the RK has not had an offer of payment
(at the correct level)refused?

It's probably ammunition, but I cannot see it as being a silver bullet.
Title: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
Post by: Hippocrates on June 25, 2024, 08:29:04 am
I have just noticed over the last two days that the infamous Barbour Logic misstates the 28th day when the penalty may increase to £130. Viva Barbour Logic!  :D

Lambeth:

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/motorbike-52m-pcn-lambeth/msg27420/#msg27420

Southwark point 3 ff:

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/southwark-council-pcn/msg27334/#msg27334

So it is always worth checking the status of one's PCN before paying or challenging it.  ;)